anti-piracy controls

[IPdesign]

siemens has the tools to clean it but asks 100 € per file for the service. I hope that if one is in good faith, as in your case, they will be joined. :tongue:

are subscribed only if you provide the generalities of those who provided you with corrupt files.
but first I need to know which is the file, then go back to who was provided
If a standard part has been cloned 10 times or someone who provides it has closed the activity (of these pertiods is more frequent than you think) ...
Who pays me back?
What time do I lose in these procedures?
What damage does my company have as an image to third parties?
all this hypothesized in a single reality like mine, but if I am a company with an outfit.tec. by 10 users what is the real scope of a file that is used in "n" projects and is not intercepted instantly?

I'm sorry, I've always fought against this policy and I confirm the line.

as if an antivirus controlled files and random tells me I have an infected file.. How many would they buy it?

 

[ceschi1959]

I am very favorable to control pirate licenses because they allow to face unfair competition.
Some modes I find a little excessive and, above all, double-cut.
For example, they can allow real sabotage.
a move that I did not understand of siemens was to introduce obligatoryly and only in Italy (from what I was told) the cyd. I was so well with my usb-licenza, while now I must necessarily turn with a laptop to carry the license, unless to pay more money for borrowing.
for the record and the story, in the passage from version ug15.2 to 15.3 there was the insertion of the immediate notice of a file made with a craccade license: a Cubist character message was displayed that invited to contact gtac.

 

[cacciatorino]

but companies that do strategic work (defense, high technology) will be able to trust a software that declares to call home whenever you use it?

 

[IPdesign]

for the record and the story, in the passage from version ug15.2 to 15.3 there was the insertion of the immediate notice of a file made with a craccade license: a Cubist character message was displayed that invited to contact gtac.

Allow me to disagree on your statement.
I received first person files that turned out to be non-compliant at months distance
then happy your declaration of immediacy.
we do not provide false news.
control happens random as well as file block.

 

[ceschi1959]

Allow me to disagree on your statement.
I received first person files that turned out to be non-compliant at months distance
then happy your declaration of immediacy.
we do not provide false news.
control happens random as well as file block.

Sorry, but I didn't finish the surgery.
This message appeared only and escusively with version 15 (I had direct experience).
in later versions I have no longer seen anything, then since nx3 I have come rumors of causes brought by companies, for craccati files, to suppliers using 'fonfe' licenses.
What do you think of the cd?

Hi.

 

[IPdesign]

Sorry, but I didn't finish the surgery.
This message appeared only and escusively with version 15 (I had direct experience).
in later versions I have no longer seen anything, then since nx3 I have come rumors of causes brought by companies, for craccati files, to suppliers using 'fonfe' licenses.
What do you think of the cd?

Hi.

Well, that the causes are gone, I'm not surprised, but that then they have come to trial, I have some doubts and here for the slowness of our justice, where the scam sometimes fails before I have justice.

As far as the cd (composite id) has just entered, I replace the old license on hostid and the usb key, I have some perplexity but I do not find it so bad.

Ultimately they have circumvented the too easy "furbate" to set the same address of the network card maybe on multiple machines in the same company; having so many clones.
and you have also removed the problem of having n keys scattered around the world with known driver problems at each operating system .
So in my opinion ok for the cd, even if once you realize what the system of creation of the same cloning the machine is still quite simple. and here I stop to avoid touching prohibited topics from the forum .

 

[cacciatorino]

Also solid eege now works with the license linked to the hw, and this puts (to the user obviously) two grissi problems:

1) if you have to work on two pcs (a fixed and a laptop), one at a time obviously, it becomes problematic. "travel licenses" were invented, which in my opinion is a solemn nonsense.

2) If you have to drop the license target machine when you're no longer in maintenance, it seems there's no way to do it legally. Having repeatedly urged siemens on this point, I never had an answer, if I didn't ask you to tell me that the retailer in his discretion could also do me the favor of helping me to marry the license but look at you is doing a pleasure, don't think it's your right etcetc.
I want to see if I fry the ws on Friday and I have to deliver the project on Monday what I do... .

I've never seen a more disrespectful licensing of the client than the siemens.

 

[IPdesign]

Fortunately I have not yet needed to replace the cd after closing the assistance.
anyway I think at the max next year I will have to replace the ws and they will be playful to hear how they treat you

 

[maxopus]

I have an idea about this.
It's no use adopting an anti-piracy policy like this.
1) because before they prevented the globe (remembered as they turned 7-8 years ago the "license" files of solid edge), so much so that the vast majority of third parties working sheet use this software for the most part and I never found anyone who had a regular license. the same policy has adopted the autodesk, a license of "autocad" there also have children who use the pc only for videogames.
After doing all this with the perfect awareness of what they did... now they start making anti-piracy cops.... as he said, but please me.
2) if someone wants to use pirated software and note that it became impossible to use siemens software ... very simply changes software.
in conclusion, or this policy adopts it all (siemens, ptc, dassault, autodesk ... so much to make names) or it only serves to break the boxes to its customers.

 

[cacciatorino]

After doing all this with the perfect awareness of what they did... now they start making anti-piracy cops.... as he said, but please me.

I think it's for me to pull up two money with the reclamation of infected files, infected by themselves obviously. First in the lab I study a virus, then I put the banquet in the street and I sell you the antibiotic, beautiful cunt!

in conclusion, or this policy adopts it all (siemens, ptc, dassault, autodesk ... so much to make names) or it only serves to break the boxes to its customers.

Also because the repression of piracy should be borne by law enforcement, not by people who by trade take care of anything else!

 

[re_solidworks]

sin that of control of the forces of order never see it and often I feel that I am dear and when I justify myself explaining my costs.... they laugh at me like to tell me to be smart!
Let us forget, this is the main evil of Italy and that is the tolerance of illegality. If you do something illegal, you have to be sunk in 5 minutes, just so everyone is straight.

 

[IPdesign]

a chi lo dici,

 

[Fulvio Romano]

sin that of control of the forces of order never see it and often I feel that I am dear and when I justify myself explaining my costs.... they laugh at me like to tell me to be smart!
Let us forget, this is the main evil of Italy and that is the tolerance of illegality. If you do something illegal, you have to be sunk in 5 minutes, just so everyone is straight.

I disagree.
If I did something and got stuck in five minutes, and that would happen for everyone, maybe there would be less "need" to do something illegal. It would not be just fear of punishment.

and by "need" I mean the speech that "if everyone does it and I don't, I'm cut off the market." wrong speech and easy alibi, but this is not the point.

but what was the bill that required to report the license number of the program used?

 

[maxopus]

....
but what was the bill that required to report the license number of the program used?

That would have been something I would have liked if it came into operation.
In this way we do not fight the whole phenomenon (it is partially bypassable), but we would give it a nice crush.