ilfrau
Guest
hello to all
I am doing an exercise aimed at basic fluent learning (ansys workbench 13 package).
my problem is the analysis of the air motorcycle field in the crossing of a fan
I have been given cad files of simplified geometry (for example the fan blade shaft is not supported by anything).
I proceeded as follows, but I don't know if I did well:
is correct to eliminate the geometry of the blades and the shaft with a bolean operation, but not keeping such physical geometries in the model?
do not have repercussions after I "turn the fluid?" Why do I think that by turning a fluid volume that has "excavated" the geometry of the blades... well this geometry will swirl with the fluid not? So it's like the blades weren't right?
I also have to do the same simulation with a fifth of the geometry.
In fact I have 5 blades that do not overlap and the geometry of the conduit and circular
every fifth therefore would take a shovel
I don't know how to set the conditions in the fluent for simulation. . .
I am doing an exercise aimed at basic fluent learning (ansys workbench 13 package).
my problem is the analysis of the air motorcycle field in the crossing of a fan
I have been given cad files of simplified geometry (for example the fan blade shaft is not supported by anything).
I proceeded as follows, but I don't know if I did well:
- imported the geometry of the fluid part after having removed it with a bolean operation, the geometry of the blades and the shaft without maintaining these: I therefore have the geometry of the fliudo with "scavata" the geometry of the blades and tree, without these solids inside
- Mass
- imposed in the fluent in the menu cell zone conditions the frame motion, rotation axis z, and its rotation speed (turn the fluid instead of turning the blades)
- in boundary conditions though, under the wall entry, they told me to set wall motion : moving wall, instead of the default stationary wall option.
- but it seems wrong because ok, the fluid turns instead of turning the blades, but it seems wrong to turn the wall too
- ...
is correct to eliminate the geometry of the blades and the shaft with a bolean operation, but not keeping such physical geometries in the model?
do not have repercussions after I "turn the fluid?" Why do I think that by turning a fluid volume that has "excavated" the geometry of the blades... well this geometry will swirl with the fluid not? So it's like the blades weren't right?
I also have to do the same simulation with a fifth of the geometry.
In fact I have 5 blades that do not overlap and the geometry of the conduit and circular
every fifth therefore would take a shovel
I don't know how to set the conditions in the fluent for simulation. . .