create explosions in inventor

[pelleduna]

Bye to all,
How do explosions in inventor professional 2017? !
those that I can then put on the table, list and post the parts, and move to the assembly to have clear instructions on how to mount my set? etc. etc.
and that I also use to verify that I have thought of a "possible" mounting.

I tried to distract myself between guides, tutorials, tests, but I don't find the way.. maybe I'm conditioned by solidedge (I know better) in which:
1. select the parts you want to "move"
2. select the reference part from which you want to "place" the parts of point 1
3. select the reference surface/plan of the part of point 2 from which you want to "setting" the parts of point 1
4. from the direction (there are two possible) and tell how many xx mm you want to marry
5. Okay.
if then "placed" part of point 2 compared to a surface of another part yy mm, then those xx mm of point 4 are kept between the parts of point 1 and the surface of part 3.
I do not find here how to do with scenes, storyboards etc.

if you tell me a tutorial, a guide (maybe focused on the topic..) or the keywords to try to solve this gap without being able to explain for thread and for sign the procedure, it's all right!

Thank you

 

[Catafratto]

by inventor: f1 opens the help, in the search bar write exploded: it is a good start...

 

[pelleduna]

Oh, come on, inventor has a help?
I didn't know.

I've already looked at it, what do you think. but if you have any other suggestions that I haven't made yet, I'll be grateful.
I read that in inventor we talk about "presentations", but it seemed to me something more cinematographic than useful in my end. I have seen that I can move the pieces, but only from their position in the axieme, and not from a surface of a reference part. If I have a "chain" with 73 parts, I would like to be able to move (explode) 1 compared to the 2, the 2 compared to the 3 (and automatically moves me the 1 seen that the 1 is referred to the 2) and so on.

 

[batstar]

...., I would like to be able to move (explode) 1 compared to 2, 2 compared to 3 (and automatically moves me 1 seen that 1 is referred to 2) and so on.

selections 1, 2 and 3, shifts of a x value, deselections 1 and shifts of a y value, deselections 2 and shifts of a z value.

 

[Matteo Cappelli dis.CAD]

forse questo potrà essere useful

buon lavoro
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cm_dkyiathu

 

[Catafratto]

Oh, come on, inventor has a help?
I didn't know.

I didn't mean to offend you, if I did, I apologize.

Have a good day.

 

[pelleduna]

hi batstar, it's not exactly what I'm looking for: your solution is a workaround where however I lose the association between the movements, and I should start moving in block all the pieces except what I want to keep as "base". We're very uncomfortable if I have a set with 100 pieces or more, some of which maybe they're inside and can't be seen.

hi "matteo hats dis.cad", thanks to the link, but this "mode" I had already seen it. However, it is an absolute shift compared to the position of the part in the whole. instead I try (I knew there was) the way to make relative movements of one part regarding the surface of another part.

Does anyone know if this is possible in inventor professional 2017? ?

hello catafract, but what offense! I wanted to laugh. .
Before asking for help in the forums, I try to document as much as possible to avoid trivial questions: then I don't always succeed. .

 

[TECNOMODEL]

I'm installing 2017 right now, the technician told me that in this release was inserted the part that was in publisher with remarkable improvements of the explosions.
Have you tried with those tools?

 

[batstar]

hi batstar, it's not exactly what I'm looking for: your solution is a workaround where however I lose the association between the movements, and I should start moving in block all the pieces except what I want to keep as "base". We're very uncomfortable if I have a set with 100 pieces or more, some of which maybe they're inside and can't be seen.
....

Sorry but I didn't notice you were asking for the 2017 version, I unfortunately am still at 2014 where the presentations are quite hostical... .