error drilling function

[jiji_akiko]

Good evening to all,
Can someone tell me how to solve this function error?
I checked several times:
- sketch does not present errors or old reference points;
- There are no errors in the function.
shows this check in the browser, but the drill works properly.

 

[falonef]

Hi.

but why not place it in the section dedicated to the software with which you have the problem and not in the general forum section?

possible that it is not intuitive to post correctly?

 

[jiji_akiko]

Hi.

but why not place it in the section dedicated to the software with which you have the problem and not in the general forum section?

possible that it is not intuitive to post correctly?

Hello, falonef,
I thank you and now I have noticed that by scrolling below, there are in addition to the topics also software.
I ask you (for the next few times): What can I write in that general?

 

[falonef]

give a peek and let it be opened.

perhaps at the beginning there is a description of what could be placed here

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

I had at least written about what software it is. .

next time you wonder what the main topic is about, what it focuses on, looks at all sections, even subsections of course, and then starts to screech. if you remain in doubt on more than one writing in the most generalist or frequent.

In this case we talk about an error of the drilling function, the argument is not puncture, the error of the function that in turn is closely linked to a specific software so the main topic is liso of the software.

ask moderators to move the discussion to the correct section; do not open another discussion otherwise they create desperate doubles.

 

[meccanicamg]

Good evening to all,
Can someone tell me how to solve this function error?
I checked several times:
- sketch does not present errors or old reference points;
- There are no errors in the function.
shows this check in the browser, but the drill works properly.View attachment 69291

solve with the drill and the suitable tip.

no software.
No cad.
no right section.
no solution.

 

[jiji_akiko]

solve with the drill and the suitable tip.

no software.
No cad.
no right section.
no solution.

Hello mechanicalmg,
Do you recommend a column or hand drill?

 

[jiji_akiko]

I had at least written about what software it is. .

next time you wonder what the main topic is about, what it focuses on, looks at all sections, even subsections of course, and then starts to screech. if you remain in doubt on more than one writing in the most generalist or frequent.

In this case we talk about an error of the drilling function, the argument is not puncture, the error of the function that in turn is closely linked to a specific software so the main topic is liso of the software.

ask moderators to move the discussion to the correct section; do not open another discussion otherwise they create desperate doubles.

Hello Masses,
It's a process I've never done. Just writing to a moderator in private?
for the software I thought it was enough to put #, since you see the top left of the discussion.
However I thank you, from the next time I will write in the title also the software or other references.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

It's a process I've never done. Just writing to a moderator in private?

Yes, here. find the list of moderators; if a section of specific relevance is not indicated, see in the inventor section which of them is present. I didn't ask you to learn this practice.

for the software I thought it was enough to put #, since you see the top left of the discussion.

who reads the messages immediately goes to the written part and does not start to analyze the contour in which (I surely), among other things, the tags (which serve to much more than to indicate the software mentioned) are written in small with colors not appearing and escape especially to those who have been on the pc for several hours.

However I thank you, from the next time I will write in the title also the software or other references.

if you talk about a specific software and placed in the correct section do not need to quote it in the title; the title must be clear and concise by making understand the topic that will then be developed in the body of the post (for example, it is useless to write a mile of explanation and then in the body to write only - help me-; as it is equally useless to write in the title - help- and then to make a very long post. in both cases users are obliged to read and invest time and then perhaps understand that the topic does not affect, or if they have no knowledge)

 

[meccanicamg]

Hello mechanicalmg,
Do you recommend a column or hand drill?

un girabichin

 

[Focus]

discussion moved in the relevant section.

 

[jiji_akiko]

Yes, here. find the list of moderators; if a section of specific relevance is not indicated, see in the inventor section which of them is present. I didn't ask you to learn this practice.

who reads the messages immediately goes to the written part and does not start to analyze the contour in which (I surely), among other things, the tags (which serve to much more than to indicate the software mentioned) are written in small with colors not appearing and escape especially to those who have been on the pc for several hours.

if you talk about a specific software and placed in the correct section do not need to quote it in the title; the title must be clear and concise by making understand the topic that will then be developed in the body of the post (for example, it is useless to write a mile of explanation and then in the body to write only - help me-; as it is equally useless to write in the title - help- and then to make a very long post. in both cases users are obliged to read and invest time and then perhaps understand that the topic does not affect, or if they have no knowledge)

hello Mass, thank you for the answer and availability.

 

[DrBarde]

going to the core of the matter, to 90% of the cases I usually get enough to redefine the face of the sketch. so inventor is happy and takes off the spun.

 

[jiji_akiko]

going to the core of the matter, to 90% of the cases I usually get enough to redefine the face of the sketch. so inventor is happy and takes off the spun.

Hello drbarde,
I tried everything: to redefine the face of the sketch, to add "participants" of random work, until to open the sketch and change it to make it as simple as possible; But nothing! In the end I had to do another sketch with a new drill, and it didn't bother me.
I wanted to figure out if someone had such a mistake.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

Why didn't you attach the file?

 

[Peppe]

going to the core of the matter, to 90% of the cases I usually get enough to redefine the face of the sketch. so inventor is happy and takes off the spun.

In this case the sketch would present errors and also would have an exclamation point.

Sometimes it also happens to me to have this problem apparently unresolvable if not erasing the processing (not the sketch) and doing the same.
or if in design doctor does not have errors (the classic red cross) and processing is carried out without problems very often I leave to be

 

[jiji_akiko]

Why didn't you attach the file?

Hello Masses,
I didn't think of it, it'll be next.