families walls stretch of different color

[mario cant]

Hello, everyone.
I am new to this forum, and I am neophyte of revit.
I would have to ask a question, to whom is more experienced, about the families of walls of revit:

is it possible to create for the walls of separate families according to the color of the stretch (line of the contour), that is, by making an example it is possible to create a family wall with the red contour and another with the blue contour color?

Furthermore, these colours, distinct from the walls, should be made available not only in the current floor but in all floors (example 01, 02, 03, etc.) of the project as well as in the 3d views.

In the event that this is possible to do so, in the printing phase it is possible to ensure that the contours of the walls are printed in black ?
Thank you in advance

 

[Tristan]

is it possible to create for the walls of separate families according to the color of the stretch (line of the contour), that is, by making an example it is possible to create a family wall with the red contour and another with the blue contour color?

Furthermore, these colours, distinct from the walls, should be made available not only in the current floor but in all floors (example 01, 02, 03, etc.) of the project as well as in the 3d views.

not directly, but with the inline filters you should succeed.

In the event that this is possible to do so, in the printing phase it is possible to ensure that the contours of the walls are printed in black ?

revit is like saying a software of the type wysiwyg, that is "what you see is what you print", so no, it is not possible. . If you use filters, just duplicate the view and turn off the filter, so you would have seen work and views for printing (which is better)

 

[mario cant]

not directly, but with the inline filters you should succeed.

I thank you for the answer...... filters: you would mind clarifying what they are and what they need...... and if it is not too much by making simple examples.
I use and know in depth autocad 2d and 3d, and I do not explain how basic things, like those I referred to, are not possible to make them in a soft as revit!
a soft so bloated as revit should allow it....it will be my little knowledge of its use but I personally in "use it" I feel like "soffocated" ...... suffocated in creativity and in the possibility to create everything that goes through my mind, with an expression ...... fantasy.
you know them.... sure... much better than me could you clarify why you should choose to use revit?? What are your advantages ? excuse but are questioned by neophyte!
because you should choose revit instead of other blason systems like archicad .... allplan etc. so much to name the major ones!
ps: I am a usufruiter- useer of sft and I have no interest in winding that or that other flag ....I am not aside for anyone!!!!


revit is like saying a software of the type wysiwyg, that is "what you see is what you print", so no, it is not possible. . If you use filters, just duplicate the view and turn off the filter, so you would have seen work and views for printing (which is better)

Sorry to clarify the filters for the press
Thank you.

 

[mario cant]

I thank you for the answer...... filters: you would mind clarifying what they are and what they need...... and if it is not too much by making simple examples.
I use and know in depth autocad 2d and 3d, and I do not explain how basic things, like those I referred to, are not possible to make them in a soft as revit!
a soft so bloated as revit should allow it....it will be my little knowledge of its use but I personally in "use it" I feel like "soffocated" ...... suffocated in creativity and in the possibility to create everything that goes through my mind, with an expression ...... fantasy.
you know them.... sure... much better than me could you clarify why you should choose to use revit?? What are your advantages ? excuse but are questioned by neophyte!
because you should choose revit instead of other blason systems like archicad .... allplan etc. so much to name the major ones!
ps: I am a usufruiter- useer of sft and I have no interest in winding that or that other flag ....I am not aside for anyone!!!!

Sorry to clarify the filters for sytmpa too!

 

[Tristan]

When I was 15, I had a sip. I colored it, I slightly processed it, placed a skull on the mudguard and cuffs between the forks. I went crazy for that moped, climbed on the sidewalks, slalom between the cars stuck in the column and said to me: "What do I need my driver's license? What do I need the car? Under my ass I have everything I need!"
then came the autumns more or less rainy and the winters more or less rigid and this thought was sharpening. I went to the university, which was more than 50 km away from home. then holidays with friends, even more distant. Finally, the job... do you understand what I mean? with autocad you have a lot of freedom but comfortable and useful if you have to go a little bit. design a residential complex with 400 apartments with autocad (2d or, even worse, 3d), produce all the tables you need and see what happens when to things made the client asks you a little change.
I can't explain why revit is better, it's things that only understand when you learned the software. until your considerations are based on the color of the lines (which incidentally do not understand its utility) you will never learn the true potential.

filters are simply used to filter a selection of objects and at the same time modify their representation

 

[Tristan]

ah, I forgot, something not to be underestimated is also the "commercial" aspect. with this I mean the presentation of the project. with autocad how sweat and fatigue costs you to produce a table like this?
https://www.dropbox.com/s/87m6vqgub77xtus/b03.pdf

 

[mario cant]

I confess that as a boy it was also my means of locomotion.
I have seen many topics on this forum and on many I have found your interventions... precisely on revit, just for that you give me the impression of being very pertinent to revit.
< until your considerations are based on the color of the lines (which I do not understand the utility) you will never learn the true potential >
more than considerations are need related to the way to work... of organization ....I am assumed to attribute different colors to lines that will be printed with different thicknesses ....I know it is the autocad criterion but it is very effective, the color diversification creates you order and allows you not to commit distraction ...every color will have its own thickness.

against revit with the linnee all of the same chromium....in this sense ..... can lead to gross errors of thickness in the printing phase. as it turns out more complex I would distinguish, but also remember, if this or that line with which thickness were drawn.
It does not exclude that these considerations are the result of my poor current knowledge of the program.
a similar discourse would go for quotas ....scarously or very poorly manageable and customizable in revit.

It is as you say you produce a table like that represented by you you you need a lot of sweat and effort with autocad.....sforzi sometimes but rewarded because you can get a unique and personalized product and all your diversified by what will produce someone else, look like this (personalization) that in revit leaves much desire ....at least I understand.

However I seem to see in what you say......string your teeth is learning revit!
I also want to know your opinion about revit>archicad>allplan comparison!

 

[Tristan]

more than considerations are need related to the way to work... of organization ....I am assumed to attribute different colors to lines that will be printed with different thicknesses ....I know it is the autocad criterion but it is very effective, the color diversification creates you order and allows you not to commit distraction ...every color will have its own thickness.

against revit with the linnee all of the same chromium....in this sense ..... can lead to gross errors of thickness in the printing phase. as it turns out more complex I would distinguish, but also remember, if this or that line with which thickness were drawn.
It does not exclude that these considerations are the result of my poor current knowledge of the program.
a similar discourse would go for quotas ....scarously or very poorly manageable and customizable in revit.

It is as you say you produce a table like that represented by you you you need a lot of sweat and effort with autocad.....sforzi sometimes but rewarded because you can get a unique and personalized product and all your diversified by what will produce someone else, look like this (personalization) that in revit leaves much desire ....at least I understand.

you have a caddist mentality... as you say, you are addicted to the method.
If there is one thing in my opinion absolutely impersonal and not unusual is the design cad. the top of the "personalization" lies in the font of the texts, in the shaded fields and in little more...if you had told me about adobe illustrator I would have understood more.
Whatever you call effective, I call it stupid. autocad is essentially an ignorant software; for him two flanked lines are not a wall, they are simply two lines flanked without any relationship. and I must be every time defining color, layer, thickness etc...
revit of this does not need it; a wall is a wall, with all its physical and graphic features (which I can change as I prefer) and also since we talk about thicknesses, revit is able to change the thickness of the lines according to the scale automatically. autocad this can't do it! in autocad a green line is printed 3mm (e.g.) whether it is a representation at 100 whether it is a drawing at 2000 or a detail at 5.
the quotas then are customizable as you prefer. Is it true, I can't create my arrow symbol but who cares when I use half the time in listing a drawing? !
I repeat, until you understand the revit philosophy can actually seem very rigid, but this is only due to the fact that we are not in front of a tyrant software but well to a design software.

regarding the revit vs archicad vs allplan speech, there are some better features in the first, others are better in the second, others still in the third. depends on what you have to do with it.