• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

find cutting center

  • Thread starter Thread starter giulio1993
  • Start date Start date

giulio1993

Guest
good morning to all, I would need to apply a force to the center of cutting my geometry (cycling frame) but I have no idea how to find the ct with ansys, could someone give me a hand?
Thank you.
 
back to 2016, when I was doing motostudent .... method for calculating the torsion rigidity of a frame of frame? maybe read on “motorcycle dynamics” of cossalter??

Look, we got rid of this imaginary cutting center. the load comes from the pipe, and that's where you have to apply your pair.

a trick that we adopted was to define a reference point that prevented the translation of the duct and allowed only rotations... so the pair actually twisted the frame, without flenching it all on one side (because the constraints are not at the same geometric height of the application point of force.

in any case you will understand by going on in these projects and then starting to work, that when a theory is laconic, you must self-import boundary conditions (of course sense) and work on those doing comparative analysis. It is useless to look for the “right” way of doing this analysis to pull out the absolute number. define a sensible way, allowing you to say: “the x frame is more rigid than the y frame of a z%”. Stop.
 
back to 2016, when I was doing motostudent .... method for calculating the torsion rigidity of a frame of frame? maybe read on “motorcycle dynamics” of cossalter??

Look, we got rid of this imaginary cutting center. the load comes from the pipe, and that's where you have to apply your pair.

a trick that we adopted was to define a reference point that prevented the translation of the duct and allowed only rotations... so the pair actually twisted the frame, without flenching it all on one side (because the constraints are not at the same geometric height of the application point of force.

in any case you will understand by going on in these projects and then starting to work, that when a theory is laconic, you must self-import boundary conditions (of course sense) and work on those doing comparative analysis. It is useless to look for the “right” way of doing this analysis to pull out the absolute number. define a sensible way, allowing you to say: “the x frame is more rigid than the y frame of a z%”. Stop.
Thank you so much! you took everything in full:) by chance you know how to do ansys to give the bond of rigid connection between parts of the same body (I want to rigidly bind the motor attacks of the frame between them to simulate the infinitely rigid behavior of the engine itself)
 
At the time we had done it .. now at work I no longer have ansys .. maybe on weekend I do a research, even at a distance of years if I see a tutorial of that command I recognize it.

you also intend to do a real test ? we create a counter that reproduced the load and bond conditions of the model.. .
comparison in engine absence was good.
when we put the rigid point in the model and the motor on the true frame, the model overestimated the stiffness .. but of a nice pó ..

see what comes out to you
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top