fmea e dfmea

[Hope]

I write to ask for an opinion on the usefulness of tools such as fmea and dfmea and if you know of courses (online) also/especially
in English language you can recommend. alternatively also books that highlight practical aspects related to
mechanical design of complex systems. I ask you rather than google because you can give me an impartial opinion on the actual quality of the material.

it is some time that, after a design review and after agreeing the criticalities of the component/axieme to be inserted on the tables me
comes to think: but the fmea expert wanted us to understand that the seal is critical and we have to put a criticality on flatness, roughness etc?

These techniques are widely used, practically from all the organizations I have collaborated with, and I would like to succeed in
appreciate them, which I clearly cannot do by knowing them only at the superficial level. I read a lot of articles about it but nothing that made me clear.

 

[IronMike87]

assume that the new version of the fmea has just been released (which includes si design che process). So any course you can find, not for a fee, on the net, I strongly doubt that it can be related to the new directives.

we say that for how you do it in many companies, it turns out a quite useless exercise of style.... or rather, more than useless, without a true added value.
If anything, it highlights the neckline (now more and more evident) between who designs and who realizes the piece. Since the project (the oem ... or better yet, the engineering studies hired by the oem) has almost no contact with the current reality, the fmea is the only tool that somehow tries to connect the two entities.

the fmea process should serve to create the control plan.
fmea design should serve to define what are the binding characteristics of a particular.

All very nice. all very much alive only in hyperuranium (fmea should be documents alive and constantly updated ... never seen anyone constantly updating them)

 

[Hope]

assume that the new version of the fmea has just been released (which includes si design che process). So any course you can find, not for a fee, on the net, I strongly doubt that it can be related to the new directives.

we say that for how you do it in many companies, it turns out a quite useless exercise of style.... or rather, more than useless, without a true added value.
If anything, it highlights the neckline (now more and more evident) between who designs and who realizes the piece. Since the project (the oem ... or better yet, the engineering studies hired by the oem) has almost no contact with the current reality, the fmea is the only tool that somehow tries to connect the two entities.

the fmea process should serve to create the control plan.
fmea design should serve to define what are the binding characteristics of a particular.

All very nice. all very much alive only in hyperuranium (fmea should be documents alive and constantly updated ... never seen anyone constantly updating them)

hi ironmike,

I thank you for the answer, including very clear.
There are no other opinions on the subject from which to be able to draw the point of conversation.

Thanks again for the surgery.