frame rtx4000 su sw2020

[paolo_rossi]

Good morning to all,
I have a problem and I would like to know if someone else had it and how it was resolved:
we have replaced 2 pcs now very old. are identical in everything except for the video card.
both have solidworks 2020 and windows 10 64 bit pro for workstation.
the first mounts a geforce rtx 2070 and the other a painting rtx4000.

I describe the problem:
I open a project, when I turn, with the central key, the machine with the geforce the movement is smooth, while with the picture occasionally frees and then starts again. It's very annoying.
Is there a particular setting for the painting?
Does anyone have any advice?
I thank you all for any advice, and I apologize but I tried everything.
Thank you in advance.
Palo

 

[paolo_rossi]

I forgot:
if I open 2 or + solidworks, the following work fluids!!! ! !
the problem occurs only on the first open.
thanks for the attention.
Palo

 

[gil]

Unfortunately, I can't tell you. I guess you've already updated the drivers.
by curiosity, apart from this problem, what difference of performance is there between the two cards?

 

[TAURUS77]

test the nine reverse cards in the two pcs reinstall the drivers from scratch and try again.

 

[paolo_rossi]

Unfortunately, I can't tell you. I guess you've already updated the drivers.
by curiosity, apart from this problem, what difference of performance is there between the two cards?

I updated with clean installation.. .
There is no difference....it seems that the geforce pushes slightly of +.
In the 2070 computer, I uploaded the realview registry modification... it's a bomb.
I don't understand that if I load 2 or + solidworks the problem disappears.

 

[paolo_rossi]

test the nine reverse cards in the two pcs reinstall the drivers from scratch and try again.

I haven't done it yet. I think I have to try.

 

[stevie]

strange, on paper the rtx4000 is a monster.
I think it's a problem of not optimized drivers.

 

[paolo_rossi]

strange, on paper the rtx4000 is a monster.
I think it's a problem of not optimized drivers.

complete the info on the machines:
name:bestiasolidworks:2020:0.0: x64os:microsoft windows 10 pro for workstations:sp0:x64computer:gigabyte technology co., ltd.:z390 aorus mastercpu:intel(r) core(tm) i9-9900k cpu @ 3.60ghz [Intel64 Family 6 Model 158 Stepping 13] (16 processors)realview:7.1graphics:nvidia geforce rtx 2070 superram:16315hard disk:500:

solidworks performance test (sec) (overall= cpu + graphics + i/o)

overall=49.5 cpu= 21.0 graphics=8.3 i/o=20.2
render=6 simulation=36.9​

name:mostrosolidworks:2020:1.0: x64os:microsoft windows 10 pro for workstations:sp0:x64computer:gigabyte technology co., ltd.:z390 aorus mastercpu:intel(r) core(tm) i9-9900k cpu @ 3.60ghz [Intel64 Family 6 Model 158 Stepping 13] (16 processors)realview:8.6graphics:Invidia frame rtx 4000ram:32699hard disk:500:

solidworks performance test (sec) (overall= cpu + graphics + i/o)

overall=43.4 cpu= 21.0 graphics=8.4 i/o=14.0
render=6 simulation=95.0​

with the tests.

 

[TAURUS77]

complete the info on the machines:
name:bestiasolidworks:2020:0.0: x64os:microsoft windows 10 pro for workstations:sp0:x64computer:gigabyte technology co., ltd.:z390 aorus mastercpu:intel(r) core(tm) i9-9900k cpu @ 3.60ghz [Intel64 Family 6 Model 158 Stepping 13] (16 processors)realview:7.1graphics:nvidia geforce rtx 2070 superram:16315hard disk:500:

solidworks performance test (sec) (overall= cpu + graphics + i/o)

overall=49.5 cpu= 21.0 graphics=8.3 i/o=20.2
render=6 simulation=36.9​

name:mostrosolidworks:2020:1.0: x64os:microsoft windows 10 pro for workstations:sp0:x64computer:gigabyte technology co., ltd.:z390 aorus mastercpu:intel(r) core(tm) i9-9900k cpu @ 3.60ghz [Intel64 Family 6 Model 158 Stepping 13] (16 processors)realview:8.6graphics:Invidia frame rtx 4000ram:32699hard disk:500:

solidworks performance test (sec) (overall= cpu + graphics + i/o)

overall=43.4 cpu= 21.0 graphics=8.4 i/o=14.0
render=6 simulation=95.0​

with the tests.

cpu times are comparable...the thing that I know is different versions of realview 7.1 vs 8.6 then 16gb ram against 32. If I were you, I'd take control
1) verify that windows 10 is installed correctly with all the latest updates on both workstations
2) verify that the drivers for the picture have been installed correctly and as I said before I reversed the cards and prove them.
3) if the picture does some whim try to install the tool specviewperf 13 https://www.spec.org/gwpg/downloadindex.html#gpc and make a complete bench and check the result with other workstations on specorg https://www.spec.org/gwpg/gpc.data/vp13/summary.htmlhttps://www.spec.org/gwpg/gpc.data/vp13/fujitsu/celsius_w580_e2286g_rtx4000/gpcresults.html4) when you install the drivers remembered to plan the previous ones by disconnecting them completely with https://www.guru3d.com/files-details/display-driver-uninstaller-download.htmlLet us know how it went.

 

[paolo_rossi]

cpu times are comparable...the thing that I know is different versions of realview 7.1 vs 8.6 then 16gb ram against 32. If I were you, I'd take control
1) verify that windows 10 is installed correctly with all the latest updates on both workstations
2) verify that the drivers for the picture have been installed correctly and as I said before I reversed the cards and prove them.
3) if the picture does some whim try to install the tool specviewperf 13 https://www.spec.org/gwpg/downloadindex.html#gpc and make a complete bench and check the result with other workstations on specorg https://www.spec.org/gwpg/gpc.data/vp13/summary.htmlhttps://www.spec.org/gwpg/gpc.data/vp13/fujitsu/celsius_w580_e2286g_rtx4000/gpcresults.html4) when you install the drivers remembered to plan the previous ones by disconnecting them completely with https://www.guru3d.com/files-details/display-driver-uninstaller-download.htmlLet us know how it went.

thank you very much taurus77 of the councils.
in the weekend I will test and I will tell you.

 

[gil]

I would have liked to know more. can also be a very rare occurrence to understand how they work and compare video cards "consumer" and "professional".@paolo_rossi Can you let us know something to do?

 

[TAURUS77]

I would have liked to know more. can also be a very rare occurrence to understand how they work and compare video cards "consumer" and "professional".@paolo_rossi Can you let us know something to do?

hi gil!! you are perfectly right... at the moment I'm evaluating myself to take a consumer and I was oriented on the amd rx 5700 xt that has very interesting performance with cad... but there is always something that brakes me. I'm still repeating it now "when I'm going to sign professional video cards? ".

 

[gil]

the reviews I have seen focus on videoediting and gaming software, in these tests the 5700xt has the best performance price ratio in its range. of counter does not support raytracing, so it is assumed that in the long term it keeps less the price, but it is to evaluate the specific case of use.
However there are those who complain about lag problems (in the gaming industry), and I heard that on amazon is the video card with more returns from customers. reason why they find themselves easy on the warehouse, but with very low savings.
it would be compared with one of the radeon pro series of equal price. What are you doing buying a wx to see the difference?

 

[ale47p]

... I repeat it again now "when I'm going to sign professional video cards? ".

until we pay for our own free will a software that in fact obliges us to have that hardware we are choosing it, it is accepted, they are not robbing us.

the apple world has understood it from a lifetime, people are happy to spend money, customers stay if you give them an excellent service. I personally detest that making some peripherals incompatible with new operating systems are turning something that works in garbage. but it's part of the game that keeps the world where we are now. I don't buy from them, but I don't blame who does. Everyone finally eats on their own.

As for the "our" sector, the service currently offered is that, do you need that software? well, to work you have to take from the usual 3 manufacturers a workstation, which always mounts nvidia, and that only turns on windows. that then they also hang, and the fault at the end is haarp antennas in Alaska. and you blaspheme thinking about what cost pc, subscriptions and assistants. ..all premium pro blah blah blah.

otherwise there is freecad that turns great on linux with a consumer video card from 100 euros quietly on a pc from 500 euros with technologies of 5 years ago. the choice is ours, to do according to our needs. I don't know (for now) program and I can only thank those who do so and even make available the sources.

Clearly that the software houses of the various most famous cads will never (also closed source) a release for linux, the assistance would be a nightmare. I hope, of course, I'll be sorry in the future. . .

on linux nvidia drivers are found, both original and third-party, better always check if they exist for their video card before buying. on my 2016 PC with ubuntu 16.04 lts I can make 100% use of resources (including video card - geforce 1050ti) if I use the right software, written well.

would serve an opensource 3d software with countercosis, at the height of competitors, in addition to so much desire to learn to deal with something different than the usual windows installer "forward forward"

 

[TAURUS77]

the reviews I have seen focus on videoediting and gaming software, in these tests the 5700xt has the best performance price ratio in its range. of counter does not support raytracing, so it is assumed that in the long term it keeps less the price, but it is to evaluate the specific case of use.
However there are those who complain about lag problems (in the gaming industry), and I heard that on amazon is the video card with more returns from customers. reason why they find themselves easy on the warehouse, but with very low savings.
it would be compared with one of the radeon pro series of equal price. What are you doing buying a wx to see the difference?

ops!!...this story of the returns had escaped... thank you
the hardware counterpart is the radeon pro w5700 but costs double....in the meantime appearance. already this year I gave a cut with the past and I changed work maybe now I turn out again and I put to make reviews on youtube and I open a site....naaaahhh!! ! ! !

 

[gil]

ops!!...this story of the returns had escaped... thank you

They are voices and indiscretions, of which I have no certain source. a few days ago came out this video, a ranking of the products most rendered by amazon, the 5700xt and 5700 are not there. on the contrary there is a reliable card like the picture. So you're the one who understands.

However if you are looking on the net you will find people who report the problem. It is also true that they are new cards, for which drivers have had many updates. therefore likely to be simple settlement.

 

[paolo_rossi]

I would have liked to know more. can also be a very rare occurrence to understand how they work and compare video cards "consumer" and "professional".@paolo_rossi Can you let us know something to do?

Sorry I'm late,
Because of this situation, I had to focus on urgencies. I only did the tests.
everything turned out positive.
I reinstalled the drivers of the video card, but there is no difference.
meanwhile I updated sw to version 2 but nothing changed.
I just have to exchange the cards and possibly reinstall the know.
I think I'll do it soon.

 

[TAURUS77]

in the worst case replaced the card as it is in guarantee... don't waste time because my supplier took three months for a replacement. only when he saw the eyes red fire replaced me the card... I told him I'd charge him the parking costs.

 

[stevie]

I fear that the problem lies in the drivers not optimized, I will be wrong but I doubt it is a hardware problem of the card...if it was a hardware problem you should have system crash, not just a slowdown, and then strange the fact that opening two cards the second travels and the first no... I think it is a matter of drivers made to the ca***

 

[TAURUS77]

hi...looking the features of the cpu jumped to the eye that has built-in graphics intel uhd 630. https://www.intel.it/content/www/it/it/products/processors/core/i9-processors/i9-9900k.htmlfrom bios deactivates the integrated graphics.
as the comedian said "more nin zò!"
Good luck.