il_guerriero
Guest
Hello everyone! I use solidworks recently and would like to ask the most experienced users of me an idea about how to model the wire mesh listed in the annex... Thank you:
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
MassiVonWeizen
Guest
do:
revolution
holes
apply an aspect with transprence that makes it look like a network
revolution
holes
apply an aspect with transprence that makes it look like a network
il_guerriero
Guest
I was looking for a method to realize the wire mesh by woven wires, but I think I will follow your idea... thank you very kind:finger:
MassiVonWeizen
Guest
then it would be useful to be more precise in the demands.I was looking for a method to realize the wire mesh by woven wires
for the central part models a vertical thread and a horizontal one making them as sweep with the path and section of the wire and then repeating them linearly with the step equal to the point where they cross
I don't know what to suggest.
definitely is a job that weighs down the file very much and if it doesn't have any computing utility it doesn't help anything
il_guerriero
Guest
ok ok thanks again...I preferred to choose the first road you suggested
Kakisan
Guest
I would do 2 configurations,
a complete, to be used in the table, and a lightened, suspending the wires and replacing them with a full wall, to be used together.
a piece of the genus completely modeled weighs monstrously the asses.
a complete, to be used in the table, and a lightened, suspending the wires and replacing them with a full wall, to be used together.
a piece of the genus completely modeled weighs monstrously the asses.
MassiVonWeizen
Guest
but also so, if it is not strictly necessary, it is a useless job in terms of time and system resources.
in the table you add a retino and put the note of the type of knitting.
in the table you add a retino and put the note of the type of knitting.
Max-C
Guest
I also agree with Massivonweizen.
I do 2 configurations only if I had to make a fem on the model. then the first configuration would be complete and the second simplified. Otherwise, I don't even see the point. becomes only more complex, heavy and long to realize. . .
I do 2 configurations only if I had to make a fem on the model. then the first configuration would be complete and the second simplified. Otherwise, I don't even see the point. becomes only more complex, heavy and long to realize. . .
Kakisan
Guest
with that much... seen that he wants to get hurt by shaping the net... I want to use the detail only where it is needed, together I don't think it is useful.
If I did it... I would do it as you said, in one configuration with the note on tavoila of the type of network!
If I did it... I would do it as you said, in one configuration with the note on tavoila of the type of network!