positioning part with constraints led by family table

[Tekkasoft]

Hello everyone

I need to insert a part in a set with three constraints (as is typical) of which one (coupling angle) I would like to guide it from family table.
I did a research but I couldn't find help.

have any of you already faced the problem and know how to do it?
thanks in advance and good work to all

 

[DANI-3D]

Bye-bye.
you sow this method:
insert a new plan into the set, check the position via ft and use this to mate the detail.

 

[Tekkasoft]

Hi.
Thanks for the help but this morning I solved the problem.

the thing works like this:
1. go to the window of relationships
2. select the "component" item from the drop-down list and select the component in the axieme
3. always in the Reports window, press the button "change between quota values and names"
4. the positioning quotas are highlighted in the axieme
5. select that interested "coupling angle" (d12) which was what I was looking for
6. write the rest of the report [d12 = angolo, ad esempio] where corner is the parameter driven by family table

I have not explained what my difficulty was.
the problem arises from the fact that when you go into the relationship window and you select the component, with "assieme" in the drop-down list, only the building quotas of the component and not the positioning ones are shown.
the solution is quite simple but like all things, after discoveries, become easy.

Thanks again
Good job

 

[DANI-3D]

Hi.
your method is great if the components are few, otherwise I prefer to entrust the rotation using a plan to which to report all the individual details, it is safer and it is easier to manage also thinking about possible changes and/or replacements of future pieces.

 

[leleallariscossa]

Hi.
your method is great if the components are few, otherwise I prefer to entrust the rotation using a plan to which to report all the individual details, it is safer and it is easier to manage also thinking about possible changes and/or replacements of future pieces.

hi, I follow the procedure described above by tekkasoft, i.e. imposed the relationship d16=180 (it is a zipper that has to open, d16 is obviously the quota relative to the opening angle that in the generic variant is 180), then in the ft imposed the variant 'open' with the value d16=270.
I open my variant and stays on 180. if before I open the variant check the list of the fts I remain the angles 180 and 270, if instead I verify the fts after opening my variant 'open', known that both angles are set to 180.. In practice it is as if the variant overwrites the table conditions in the general set. Why? ?

 

[leleallariscossa]

hi, I follow the procedure described above by tekkasoft, i.e. imposed the relationship d16=180 (it is a zipper that has to open, d16 is obviously the quota relative to the opening angle that in the generic variant is 180), then in the ft imposed the variant 'open' with the value d16=270.
I open my variant and stays on 180. if before I open the variant check the list of the fts I remain the angles 180 and 270, if instead I verify the fts after opening my variant 'open', known that both angles are set to 180.. In practice it is as if the variant overwrites the table conditions in the general set. Why? ?

answer: I had not to set the relationship as described by tekkasoft (probably it was an old necessity) but going directly into the family table and setting the values with the name of the quota, you can parameterize the variant. . .

 

[320i S]

answer: I had not to set the relationship as described by tekkasoft (probably it was an old necessity) but going directly into the family table and setting the values with the name of the quota, you can parameterize the variant. . .

Remember that certain quotas need, there is flexibility and mechanism constraints, instead of creating family variants.