problems in putting correct quotas

[AnnaCantone]

Good morning to all I am a student design and I find myself having to quote an object in this case a bottle. I have several doubts about how to put the quotas for threads and sections and whether those I added are correct or not. They've been laughing at us for a while and I don't know how to solve the situation. as software use rhino 5. Thank you very much in advance

 

[asblo]

It is not very clear what your doubts are. in the first drawing of the bottle the quotas that are fine, even if there are many missing, the thread is not there, you can quote it on the front view taking between the quotation lines the outer radius of the coils.
the second design is undefined, would it be the cap? the thread can quote it in the section view, with the same nomenclature as the male thread of the bottle. Instead, all the diametrical odds you have placed in the lower view is better to indicate them in a frontal or sectional view. then that kind of dome does not seem consistent between the section view and the other

 

[AnnaCantone]

Okay. then the main problem in the bottle is how to represent the quotations in the section to indicate the thickness of the bottle. I have no idea how to take the outer radius of the coils.
while for the cap has undergone updates that I send.

 

[AnnaCantone]

Anyway thank you very much

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

the quota lines and those of the geometry are identical and it is hard to understand how the particular
the radius on the left side view is too vertical and is confused on the axis and geometry
the diameter of the lower view does not understand what is reported
the side view on the right is equal to that on the left and should not be so
the a-a section should be put alongside the view from which it derives for a better reading and quotas should be closer
in general: you could use a larger scale, remove the tires of the decimals and round where possible the others (I don't think that for a particular similar they serve the cents), make the terminals of the larger quotas (there is a legislation on this)
not within the quotation because the design is represented little clearly

 

[AnnaCantone]

Okay. while for what concerns bottle threads?

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

the thread is always quoted with:
Step by step
nominal diameter
then if the thread is standard extra scope of application, but it is however subject to regulations (unf, gas, asa....) the norm or reference name should be indicated (to understand anyone on a mechanical design puts threaded hole according to iso) or in the pipes the gas reference.
if the thread is special you must specify everything you need to create the crest and the surrounding geometry:
angle of the propeller
medium diameter
bottom diameter
ridge diameter
Step by step
....

 

[wert]

in the quotation of the bottle, in addition to the diameter and bombing of the bottom, it would be essential to insert the distances of the radius center. between the bottle axis and the radius center, regarding the x axis. between the bottom bottle and the radius center, for the axis y. for the thickness, in the section you can quote the thickness, specifying maybe that it will be constant for all the particular. for the thread, as I imagine it is unified, you can not represent with a simplified graphics; I would do a great detail where to quote the size of the spire and its step.