representation painting in a drawing together

[roby295]

I am carrying out a project for educational purposes. the professor wishes that in the separate base is listed every type of component, any paint included.
here arise my doubts. the representation in a drawing of painting together happens as in a normal design of detail? Should the paint be indicated with the classic ball? If so, how exactly?
I'll show you part of the assist. the two pieces connected by bolting must be both painted on the whole surface with the same paint.

 

[TECNOMODEL]

the indication of the painting, as well as that of the thermal treatments, superficial etc., will be put in the design of the particular.
think of a combination with many details, if you have to indicate the treatment for each in separate becomes an illegible papyrus.
and how would you connect paint to his detail?

 

[roby295]

I think it exactly like you.
only that the professor does not want drawings of particular but only those of together and explosive.
but nevertheless desires a distinct complete base of all the elements necessary for the realization of the project.
but I have no idea what the right way to represent it.
maybe I should just insert paints to use in the distinct base without using the relative indication with ballpointing?

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

if the painting must also be indicated in the axieme inserts it in the description in the distinct materials, in fact the specific professor in different base and not in the drawing.
Moreover, the balls that you insert in the drawing do not mean anything unless accompanied by a distinct one.

 

[roby295]

if the painting must also be indicated in the axieme inserts it in the description in the distinct materials, in fact the specific professor in different base and not in the drawing.
Moreover, the balls that you insert in the drawing do not mean anything unless accompanied by a distinct one.

so confirm that I can limit myself to insert it into the distinct base without using its ballpoint?

 

[TECNOMODEL]

I think it exactly like you.
only that the professor does not want drawings of particular but only those of together and explosive.
but nevertheless desires a distinct complete base of all the elements necessary for the realization of the project.
but I have no idea what the right way to represent it.
maybe I should just insert paints to use in the distinct base without using the relative indication with ballpointing?

a distinct base is simply a list of the details necessary for the project, without the various designs it will not be possible to build a good nothing. unless you mention an assembly of commercial components.
as massive says the only way is to indicate it in the distinct, you will have a specific column indicating the surface treatment and here you will indicate the painting.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

I confirm.
he doesn't give a damn about what the detail is, he cares about what it should be mounted where.
is the same as the treatments such as cementing, satining and the like, do not indicate in the drawing together unless it is fundamental to the proper handling