software from 3d proitions

[sisaxix]

Hi, everybody, I'm still me, and I'm getting a little clear. Now I would like to know if there is a sofware that from the projections creates solid 3d. this would be very useful to me, as I do not know how to make solid, since it is very complex and with functions like line or extruder it would take a life or it would be impossible!
Thank you in advance!! !

 

[PierArg]

Hi, everybody, I'm still me, and I'm getting a little clear. Now I would like to know if there is a sofware that from the projections creates solid 3d. this would be very useful to me, as I do not know how to make solid, since it is very complex and with functions like line or extruder it would take a life or it would be impossible!
Thank you in advance!! !

I'm sorry, but don't you do a sketch first and give you a tip?

 

[meccanicamg]

Almost all modelers have a reverse from table puts (dwg/dxf) in solid model (depends as though). I remember they did it on inventor a few years ago. solidworks are not sure that natively do it even if it has a particular tool that you can manipulate hand drawings and make them solid.

However, it's always and basically something quite expensive to reverse. above all you must have the familiarity of having done many reverses in your life. Don't just tell him to reverse the software. There are extrusions that make it to some point, holes and holes, sections don't use them.

therefore there is no better thing than to put there with the head on the table and to recreate it in 3d, I understand the functional and geometric aspects (maybe we also run the improvement).

If you put the table we can figure out what we're talking about.

Look at this. link, however I think it is a tool that has been abandoned for its uselessness and its little ability to give satisfactory results.

However you can import into all modelers one or more sketches and work on it with a little artificial, but I assure you that the result is bad.

 

[PierArg]

However, if you talk about cad, as they are conceived, there is no such thing as from 2d to 3d.

I give you advice: to draw a good object you must always try to understand how to realize it.

If you have a strange shape in mind, which you think you cannot achieve with a cad, then trust that you will not even be able to realize it.

this because cads are "feture based", that is, every "operation" is a real "work".
from the operating tree (usually to the left of the monitor) you can trace back to the processing cycle.
this of course is explained very simple

 

[gerod]

@sisaxix: I regret that you did not show up!!! It is essential to do so, as well as to have read the forum rules.
see to settle your position.
Thank you.

 

[meccanicamg]

this because cads are "feture based", that is, every "operation" is a real "work".
from the operating tree (usually to the left of the monitor) you can trace back to the processing cycle.
this of course is explained very simple

surface processing and molds are not feauture based, so not milling and drilling machine. So... it's a theory that's the same as someone who invented himself, the lathe makes the cylindrical pieces and the milling machine does the square ones. :finger:

 

[sisaxix]

Hello, everyone! thank you for the many answers, but I still have not understood one thing: how do you put adjects inside objects? Let me explain better: how do you put a table and a bed in a cottage if it is closed? are there commands that do this? because with the line and with the extruded tool of skethup is practically impossible. can you recommend sw that facilitate this?

 

[The_Matrix]

Hello, everyone! thank you for the many answers, but I still have not understood one thing: how do you put adjects inside objects? Let me explain better: how do you put a table and a bed in a cottage if it is closed? are there commands that do this? because with the line and with the extruded tool of skethup is practically impossible. can you recommend sw that facilitate this?

But you know what you say?
You look like a Chinese.
You don't understand anything.. .
parts from impossible demands (the software that from 2d reconstruct the complex 3d automatically because you do not understand the drawings)
Then you end up sketchup like you only use that here

manco my 7-year-old daughter is + bashed on the cad

 

[meccanicamg]

But you know what you say?
You look like a Chinese.
You don't understand anything.. .
parts from impossible demands (the software that from 2d reconstruct the complex 3d automatically because you do not understand the drawings)
Then you end up sketchup like you only use that here

manco my 7-year-old daughter is + bashed on the cad

a bit rough but I share in the contents. with all 3d parametric modelers you can insert what you want in what you want....but it's called compnetration.

But it really seems to speak with a Chinese both as a lexical expression, and as a level of technology. If you are looking for a serious modeler, post what you draw in life and we see to recommend you. Then you get demos from the manufacturers.

 

[sisaxix]

the cad is not my job: I'm in the branch of the elepsy. But I liked to know something about modeling 3d. from the lexical point of view I apologize, but I wrote from a cell phone of 5 years ago, with still the 12-key keyboard and without the t9, writing correctly would drain my credit.
I still propose the question: can you recommend me a good software cad possibly free, better than sketchup, of which I have now full the bales?

 

[flaviobrio88]

the cad is not my job: I'm in the branch of the elepsy. But I liked to know something about modeling 3d. from the lexical point of view I apologize, but I wrote from a cell phone of 5 years ago, with still the 12-key keyboard and without the t9, writing correctly would drain my credit.
I still propose the question: can you recommend me a good software cad possibly free, better than sketchup, of which I have now full the bales?

what you're looking for, maybe you'll find it in 40 years and I don't think it will be free

 

[sisaxix]

thank you flaviobrio 88, but in 40 years who knows what I will be!!! Is there no parametric modeling software better than skethup?
Thank you.

 

[DESIGN]

I do not know if it is still available, but there should be a free version of alibre to model and execute 2d boards... try to do a search

 

[sisaxix]

Thank you, but I only saw trial in alibre!

 

[Tequila]

Thank you, but I only saw trial in alibre!

3d free parametric cads are not there and if there is something you do very little. of these programs or if you are looking for something more you have to put hand in your wallet.

 

[Il marangon]

But then, to draw what?

mechanical, shape, ships, planes, electrical circuits, houses, omins and puppets for animations, bridges etc. etc. etc.

each cad has its own or more specific sectors. . .

e.g.: I see it difficult to design a press or a crane with revit, choreggettemi se mistaken

 

[meccanicamg]

from which solidworks has the discount of 40% until July... .

 

[sisaxix]

Hello everyone!!! Thanks for the answers! I wanted to warn you that I "comprate" autocad 2012. They actually gave it to me because I'm a student, but there's still the fact that I have it now. Can you recommend guides or tutorials to learn it thoroughly? I would like to work with mechanics, in fact I built a robot-cameriera: It's very simple, but it sweeps me and washes the floors and I'm assembling a lot of gadgets, like a mp3 radio-reader and so on. I would now like to build another one, but with the help of a sketch in cad.

 

[Er Presidente]

There's the cad that does all these things but they don't sell it.

 

[sisaxix]

What is it called out of curiosity?