table set together with welding

[Budy]

hello to all,

are alessandro, and I am new here on the forum cad 3d. I am studying mechanical engineering, but part-time work in a design office for about 2 months.
yesterday I was entrusted with the modeling of a part with several other parts welded to it. to represent welds on the table, I should not have problems using the uni en 22553:1997. my doubt is: how do I indic/list the parties involved in the welded axieme? or, should the bubble be inserted + separate materials such as in the table of the explosions? I searched on several books and on the internet examples of tables with soldering but without success, I found only images on how to indicate the strings.

Sorry if the doubt is a little stupid.. .
Thank you

alex

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

if welded parts are extrapolated by the design then you have to make a distinct and its bubble.
If you draw it as if it were a unique body you don't need.
of course you will always have to indicate the welding points and its type

I do not think there is a rule that defines this procedure, but it is at the discretion of the owner of the design that decides according to the management of the company.
So it's who put you in the drawing that you have to tell you if you want:
a single design sized as if it were a unique body
a single design sized as if it were a unique body with distinct cut
a single design sized as if it were a unique body with distinct cut + ball
a unique design with extrapolated individual bodies and distinct materials + ball
a drawing together with distinct materials + ball and a drawing or sheet for each body
and perhaps other variations that I have not met

of course according to the request also changes the way to make the modeling: part, part with separate cut, together. . .

 

[Budy]

if welded parts are extrapolated by the design then you have to make a distinct and its bubble.
If you draw it as if it were a unique body you don't need.
of course you will always have to indicate the welding points and its type

I do not think there is a rule that defines this procedure, but it is at the discretion of the owner of the design that decides according to the management of the company.
So it's who put you in the drawing that you have to tell you if you want:
a single design sized as if it were a unique body
a single design sized as if it were a unique body with distinct cut
a single design sized as if it were a unique body with distinct cut + ball
a unique design with extrapolated individual bodies and distinct materials + ball
a drawing together with distinct materials + ball and a drawing or sheet for each body
and perhaps other variations that I have not met

of course according to the request also changes the way to make the modeling: part, part with separate cut, together. . .

ok thanks for the answer massivonweizen! In fact, they have given me to make the tables of the individual parts, and then these parts are sold together, and therefore the separate cut will be necessary to refer to the parts obtained separately.
the important point is to know that there are no rules that define how to proceed, but that it is left to the "comodity" of the client and the designer.

thanks for the detailed answer!
alex

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

in solidworks do not confuse distinct cutting and distinct materials.
the first serves to list the pieces of a multibody part and in fact you will find by default body size and type
the second serves to list parts of a set and that are files to itself and by default you will find file name or configuration.

from what you say you make a table aside you will have to use the distinct materials, otherwise you will never get out of it and ask you why it doesn't work.