• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

template drawing configuration with class quotas (ghise)

Michele1980

Guest
Good evening to all,

I wanted to ask if it is possible to preconfigure a drawing template, so that the quotas assigned to the model are automatically provided with tolerance, with value equal to the deviation prescribed for the quotas that would be without tolerance.

I'll explain.
if in the drawing there are quotas without tolerance, generally in the sheet is indicated a note of the type "for tolerance-free quotas refer to the standard/standard standard of such". that I know: a linear dimension between 100÷200mm, the expected tolerance (if not indicated) is equal to ±1 (sword); Therefore, if I quote a line that has size 145.7, default solidworks should assign ±1 tolerance.

Is that possible?

Thank you.
 
It's not possible.
you can insert a fixed tolerance (±0.1), but not that it follows a range.
But what would that make sense? is specified in the cartiglio which is the degree of tolerance and consequently the deviation for untolerated quotas.
If you do such a thing besides filling out the design of unnecessary data that disconnect the operator you are telling the workshop that all the quotas must be tolerated by drawing and then subsequently controlled. and a 100€ shaft costs you mnimo 500€ only quality control
 
Hi.

Thanks for the answer.
It is true, what you write about cost and control, but when you report the design, it may be useful to know within what range of "general tolerance" you are working and in case you correct or eliminate it.
otherwise every time, you have to take the norm and quota for quota, manually with all the sacred patience, verify its limits...I think that some activities, those that have a repetitive scheme, in support of the designer, should make the pcs, otherwise for what are we using them?

Hello and thank you.
 
all the following are personal opinions!
True, what you write about cost and control, but when you quote the design, it might be useful to know within what range of "general tolerance" you are working and in case you correct or eliminate it.
I disagree. I think you need to know what odds are for the operation of the particular and consequently where to put tolerances. and do not go for exclusion.
otherwise every time, you must take the norm and quota for quota, manually with all sacred patience, verify its limits
The question is precisely at this point. If for a dimension you doubt that it fits into a dimensional range then tolerance goes and must be controlled. if for a plate with four holes, of which only these functional ones, you care that the width is to tolerance even if it is cut by saws or dazzle then we are not.
I think some activities, those that have a repetitive scheme, in support of the designer, should do the pcs, otherwise for what we are using them
what is implemented in the software is what is supposed to be necessary to the majority of users. What you need is an exception that, as I have already said, does not follow the standard design criterion.
When there are special situations, macros are thought.
you could think or search on the net a macro that at full quotation adds these tolerances.
 
all the following are personal opinions!


I disagree. I think you need to know what odds are for the operation of the particular and consequently where to put tolerances. and do not go for exclusion.


The question is precisely at this point. If for a dimension you doubt that it fits into a dimensional range then tolerance goes and must be controlled. if for a plate with four holes, of which only these functional ones, you care that the width is to tolerance even if it is cut by saws or dazzle then we are not.


what is implemented in the software is what is supposed to be necessary to the majority of users. What you need is an exception that, as I have already said, does not follow the standard design criterion.
When there are special situations, macros are thought.
you could think or search on the net a macro that at full quotation adds these tolerances.
in fact, they are personal opinions with different needs. . .
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.

Back
Top