I'm so sorry, but then what's the point of studying and doing your deck (although you like it) if you then tell me that nobody has a job at least satisfactory. ..confused:
This is a good question! Genuine.
Let me explain... .
I'm not an engineer, I'm "normal", I work as a r&d designer in a company
I'll get a good salary, I have to admit. but frankly, I have responsibility, commitments, troubles.. .
I'll stop for 9 hours a day when I'm in the office. 12-14 or more when they're away.
If I'm wrong, it's a hundred thousand euros per shot. When I leave office three days, I have a line of mail to read from fear. I don't know.
It's a job I like and I'm glad to do it. but I am aware of my concerns.
I know very well that a worker (I did it for a nice piece) gets bigger on the physical level, takes a salary (maybe) lower than mine, but at the end of the 8 hours has "more or less" finished.
at the level of job satisfaction.. I don't know what to tell you! One "fa", the other "thinks how to do". who is "the best"? maybe neither.
Frankly, I think that going to make the engineer is a myth handed down by past generations.
I have the conviction, today as today, that a good worker, specialized, capable, good, is decisive better than an ing who has studied because "no paper is done nothing". and by the better I mean both from the professional and pay point of view.
What do you say that a job is "adequately paid" based on what you produce? based on responsibility? based on the quality of work?? ? ?
a doctor should take 10'000 euros per month, even the basic one. If he's wrong, he'll kill you. .
Should a toothbrush work for free? It's not a concept lavoor, and if it's wrong, it's not a big deal.
a designer? 5000 € if you design civil plants and 1000€ if you design the games of the ovets? based on what?