simulation express: where do i read the value of the arrow "x"?

[reggio]

hi to all, I had never used simulation express before, the insertion of the guided data is simple and quick, but the reading of the data turns out to me a little ostica, for example in this case, I need to know the value of the arrow for the hypothesized shelf, you would know where I find this value?

 

[controllofiamma]

hi reggio, in this case it seems to me to guess that the arrow is equivalent to the value you read in correspondence of the bar with red color, but if you want to be precise, you have to click with the dx on the chart of the movements, choose "modification definition" and then choose from the drop down menu the chart corresponding to the shifts on the axis y. at a glance will not change much, however the value that you read in your img corresponds to the sum of all the movements in play. the deformation scale can change it to your liking, usually it is held high to realize the resulting deformity and compare it to what you want to achieve.
Sorry I wasn't clear enough.
Hi.

 

[reggio]

Hi and thank you ... no, you were also clear, but I did not understand:tongue:

1) when you say "the arrow is equivalent to the value you read in correspondence of the bar with red color" you mean the value "1589e+001"?
if that's what I read "ures (mm)" How many mm would that match? ... and because, if I decupulate the flenching force, that value does not increase with criterion ...
2) when you say "click with the dx on the travel chart" do you mean the chart with "ures (mm)"? because if I clikko the dx appears the menu I show below but do not see "modification definition"

 

[controllofiamma]

I'm sorry, I just came back from the yard. I'm in the office tomorrow morning and I'm looking at it, so maybe I'll explain better.

 

[reggio]

I'm sorry, I just came back from the yard. I'm in the office tomorrow morning and I'm looking at it, so maybe I'll explain better.

Great, thank you, I'll wait for you:

 

[marcof]

hi reggio, in this case it seems to me to guess that the arrow is equivalent to the value you read in correspondence of the bar with red color, but if you want to be precise, you have to click with the dx on the chart of the movements, choose "modification definition" and then choose from the drop down menu the chart corresponding to the shifts on the axis y.

2) when you say "click with the dx on the travel chart" do you mean the chart with "ures (mm)"? because if I clikko the dx appears the menu I show below but do not see "modification definition"

I have the vague feeling that flame control refers to simulation in full version, while reggio speaks of the express.. .

 

[reggio]

I have the vague feeling that flame control refers to simulation in full version, while reggio speaks of the express.. .

hi, I confirm the use of the "only" simulation express (it will not jump out that with simulation express you can see only a fiction tending to the quasi-reality and that to have a bending verification it serves another software from 5/10.000€ true? )
"solidpork mi stai diludeendo""I have the vague feeling that" marcof knows a lot more than what he has shown so far, don't I? Spit it out! :wink:

 

[marcof]

hi, I confirm the use of the "only" simulation express (it will not jump out that with simulation express you can see only a fiction tending to the quasi-reality and that to have a bending verification it serves another software from 5/10.000€ true? )

I would say that simulation express is right for "bagnarsi il becco" :redface: and rafe some elementary analysis fem and it seems logical to me that to do more reliable or detailed analysis it is to hunt other grain.. .

"I have the vague feeling that" marcof knows a lot more than what he has shown so far, don't I? Spit it out! :wink:

I can assure you that of fem I know as much as crochet embroidery, but reading "controllofiamma" I thought that, missing those options in the express, he referred to the professional version. time ago I had tried out of curiosity how it worked and I also expected to see a realistic view of the deformations but apparently they are prerogatives of the version of swx for "lords" and not of the one from barbs that we have you and I:smile:

 

[reggio]

... the value "1.589e+001" ... How many mm would that match?

reading and asking here and there, it seems that the value "1.589e+001" is expressed in "scientific number" and that practically

15.89
1.589+002 = 158,9
1.589e+003 = 1589,0
and so on...
the unit of measurement then would be the one indicated alongside "ures (mm)" in this case millimeters.

I save you my usual inca####ti and caustic comments for choosing house swx and for clarity.

in any case at the end I preferred to check the values with another software more tested: "baldassini.vademecum11" I found some small differences but it is likely that they were because of the fact that swx considered shelf+planton while "baldassini.vademecum11" only checked the shelf neglecting the bending of the wedge.

thank you all, soon!

 

[controllofiamma]

I am sorry for my latitude due to unexpected construction sites, but I confirm what was said by marcof, I have no doubt about the express speech.
Hi.

 

[reggio]

I apologize for my complaint

Why, we'd miss it at the next one: