• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

autocad 2017 - news

PlannerRoad said:
the betatest phase of autocad 2017 with the new codename autocade nautilus.
Click to expand...
already...... It puts me an anxiety:
And the Nemo captain is there? ?
Mah... by now I let myself be overwhelmed and high (with philosophy) by the new innovations that innote my old world.
Hi.
 
planner a question....... Is it true that in 2017 there is a drop-down menu called xchangeworks?
and if so what is it for?
Thank you.
 
numero1 said:
planner a question....... Is it true that in 2017 there is a drop-down menu called xchangeworks?
and if so what is it for?
Thank you.
Click to expand...
this year, because of lack of time (and also desire, given the few innovations introduced in recent versions), I have no way to install the beta and test it.
However, unfortunately, betatesters are required not to disclose information about these versions.
 
the beta phase of autocad 2017, which will be officially released on March 21st.
 
Last edited:
(imho) the only noteworthy is the conversion of pdf into vector...for the rest, we are really poor
 
PlannerRoad said:
or teasing for users who continue to use it!
Click to expand...
Well, planner, if we look at the average of acad users, how many are they using the latest news? Very few! Most, during my courses, it squanders your eyes when I show you the cyclic selection, dynamic blocks, annotation scales, multifunctional grips...and I feel like asking: "But what version is this?? "
therefore, we extend a pitiful veil even on 90% of users who will continue to use autocad 2017 as an autocad 14!
 
Tristan said:
Well, planner, if we look at the average of acad users, how many are they using the latest news? Very few! Most, during my courses, it squanders your eyes when I show you the cyclic selection, dynamic blocks, annotation scales, multifunctional grips...and I feel like asking: "But what version is this?? "
therefore, we extend a pitiful veil even on 90% of users who will continue to use autocad 2017 as an autocad 14!
Click to expand...
Yes, in this respect I can not give you wrong, there are users who still fall from the clouds when talking about layout.
It is true, however, that if a software house pulls out a new version, that users pay, it would be the case that it contained something more than some function that could be included in some service pack.
 
I've been mitigated by the fact that I bought a permanent license, and I was self-convinced that when I stopped, I would still have something left.
now I don't feel like paying 665 euros of tangent to autodesk for the annual subscription of a software that makes two modifications than the previous version.
after 23 years and 15 updates is the time I leave the tunnel.. .
 
I don't know the latest versions, I saw them use by my friends, but I have the feeling that they have placement problems: if they improve modeling and rendering, acad will start to interfere with the "designer" products of the house, if they improve the modeling and parameterization of the solids the interference will move on other fronts, always at home. in the end the operating areas for acad will increasingly stiffen and consequently also the innovations to be introduced.
It's a feeling!
 
I also think it as superpippo33, in whatever direction it evolved autocad collides with products of the same autodesk of the next generation, then conceptually more evolved: revit, inventor etc. for this already for many years autocad is condemned to be relegated to being a software from “tiralinee”. However people know autocad, they do not want/time/capacity, to evolve and then continue to ask autocad.

instead of the autodesk what would you do? until customers pay, I will continue to resell the usual heated soup; happy to them. and that's what autodesk has been doing for several years.
 
Tristan said:
autocad 14!
Click to expand...
was the best version under many points of view
I had mechanical 14 that in summary was an autocad 14, cad overlay 14 and addcad 14, now for work issues I only use map since it is what passes the convent and the type of work, I also agree that the annual subscription is a little oneroso for a few changes, sometimes it bothers me to unleash, install, create an interface to me pleasant etc etc, but as long as they buy it to me not
 
Tristan said:
Well, planner, if we look at the average of acad users, how many are they using the latest news? Very few! Most, during my courses, it squanders your eyes when I show you the cyclic selection, dynamic blocks, annotation scales, multifunctional grips...and I feel like asking: "But what version is this?? "
therefore, we extend a pitiful veil even on 90% of users who will continue to use autocad 2017 as an autocad 14!
Click to expand...
I would like to say that without any arguments, mine is a simple statement, but I think it is also the result of a precise direction that selfdesk has decided to give to its products.
in adesk it affects little or nothing of the ease of use of its products, they provide software of very great power, with thousands of functions that can meet 99% of the needs but without worrying about learning curves, rationality of the interface (revit, in 2016, to add instances to a selection has still the inverted use of shift and ctrl), consistency between the products of the same families, ease of interchange of the formats (i dwg often
acad, 3ds and others are fantastic and of an amazing power and versatility, but they do too much and confusedly and are shot for software that can be used both by the single user and by the megastudio.
It is not so, but obviously the commercial and media force of adesk makes users believe and pay economically.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Total: 5 (members: 0, guests: 5)
Back
Top