• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

gstarcad vs autocad

  • Thread starter Thread starter x11start
  • Start date Start date

x11start

Guest
we have decided! in the company where I work, we have made the decision to abandon the "love arms of mother autodesk" and to throw in those, younger, slender even if more uncertain... Of gstarcad!
I must say that the passage was less difficult than I expected: gstarcad has done a great job to make the environment, menus, icons and commands, practically identical to autocad.
the difference in "slenderness" is remarkable: the size is about 200 mb (instead of a couple of giga), the installation time 5 minutes and open a drawing also very large, requires a fraction of the time. If you then decide to change a block with the block editor, at the exit you do not suffer from the slowing that I complained in my previous post and that forced to exit from autocad and return.
compatibility with autocad dwg is total: I think I have read that for about 10 years, the autodesk has lost a cause on the rights of the dwg format, so now you have to settle for showing a message that warns the user that the last rescue was not done with autocad... but cannot put elements that prevent complete compatibility from other manufacturers.
the only small "incompatibility", I found it yesterday: if you open a design that contains "text fields" created with autocad, these do not automatically update by regenerating the design or printing it (for the field "print date"), even if the preset variable is set correctly. basically it is about deleting the text field and doing it with gstarcad.
even the "millemila" programs lisp from me produced in these years, turn (almost all!) without problems, at most you need to change some small command: e.g. offset passing by a point, does not accept the command "p" (point) or "_p" (point), but wants "t" ("through" in English - "through" in Italian).
also work the vlx files, i.e. the lisp projects compiled by visual lisp even if you cannot create them with gstarcad.
here is the painful note: There is no visual editor lisp, with its convenient way to turn the "pass pass" list... so you have to go back to the old "note block" or rely on one of the many editors, but they just color the brackets to help us not make mistakes in that sense.
another "sweet note" is that I noticed a certain predisposition to "go out badly" from the program, when they get to process many entities together: I suppose it is necessary to return to create list with greater shortness: placing nil the variables no longer used, or removing the commands (vmon) (gc) (mem), which were used when autocad turned in dos and memory was very poor. I have to experiment with that.
however in the overall super positive judgment; also thinking that the pro version has a cost of approximately 700 euros including, against the over 2000 of the autodesk product.
 
what led you to choose gstarcad and not, for example, more famous programs such as bricscad or ares commander?
 
ares commander I never heard of him....
I tried progecad, but I found it too different from autocad although with interesting bim features: I would also get used to it, but colleagues wanted something to be able to use immediately without having to learn new things.
Bricscad is halfway between gstarcad and progecad... and could have been a good candidate; Besides (if not mistaken!) he also has a visual lisp editor, and developed the dcl dialog boxes, evolving those of autocad.
I also considered zwcad.... but after trying several times to install the trial version... I had to resist because every time the installation stopped... at different points.
 
a certain point of view now the autodesk gives it to rent, so it is no longer a full license, I do not wrong, however if one wants to pull 4 lines advice to use draftsight64, could "tradite" autodesk with one of the many software clone mentioned above, but if you can't do without autocad, 2 tips, do not use autocadlight, and not even autocadfull,
 
the choice of a "vertical" software (i.e. specialized in a given sector). depends on many factors... and in particular on the sector required: who deals with mechanics has no problem: almost all software have specific applications for mechanics. in our case instead (prefabricated concrete halls), are very few possible choices.... and it is illusory to think of "make yourself go well" an application born to design civil buildings.
so better take a full autocad or a gstarcad or a nanocad... without application (and let them in lisp), or try a jump in the dark with a software like teckla that however has a learning curve far from anything but light!
 
All in all, it would seem that the gstarcad passage is very little traumatic.
the only small "incompatibility", I found it yesterday: if you open a design that contains "text fields" created with autocad, these do not automatically update by regenerating the design or printing it (for the field "print date"), even if the preset variable is set correctly. basically it is about deleting the text field and doing it with gstarcad.
I don't know about lisp, but it's likely that, by inserting on menu, a command that loads a lisp specially built to change the writings made by autocad, once it becomes laborious with the gstar, the written problem would turn out less and less frequently, only opening the dwg created previously with autocad.
another "sweet note" is that I noticed a certain predisposition to "go out badly" from the program, when they get to process many entities together:
how does the video cards handle?
 
I, as mentioned in other posts, have purchased gstarcad for more than a year now and I work on it, obviously for the 2d, as I did with autocad. I never used it x 3d, use solidworks that is not minimally comparable to autocad. gstarcad never crashed and really works the same way, so you can get the same productivity. only a small different setting in texts and directories if you use annotations. difference due to the different setting that has compared to autocad.
 
All in all, it would seem that the gstarcad passage is very little traumatic.



I don't know about lisp, but it's likely that, by inserting on menu, a command that loads a lisp specially built to change the writings made by autocad, once it becomes laborious with the gstar, the written problem would turn out less and less frequently, only opening the dwg created previously with autocad.

It is not a question of "written" but of "fields.data" it is basically texts, which have the characteristic of updating automatically. If, for example, a data field is set with the print date, if I mold the design today writes the text to me with today's date, if I reset it tomorrow, the date is updated. well there is some "unconprension" with fields created by autocad and displayed later opening the design with gstarcad and vice versa. but if each one does "the own fields" (!) there is no problem.

how does the video cards handle?
video cards have no problem, indeed, being much lighter than the autocad elephant, the pc is faster.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top