if in the eula there is written differently it can do so here it is!
maybe you didn't understand how it works...you don't buy (or better, you didn't buy) the software but the right to use it, or license to use it. if in the contract you constitute with the license owner (autodesk in this case) it is written that it can at any time revoke the license of use, you can do only two things:
apart from the fact that many software houses are American, therefore, of the European court. ..however to cut the head to the bull, now they have transformed (also legally) the license from good to service, therefore as such is no longer transferable.
I understood very well. ..certo I buy the right to use it (the license) , and in this case I do not believe that in the license agreement there was written that I can not activate a software of 2010 in 2019...if then they from good burgers deliberately dismissed the servers for the activation of the old software and force you to buy / hire a new license.. .
Of course, but if only it is written (and accepted by the end user) that there may be termination of that contract at any time, we will seize it in that place and no one can say anything.
Forgive me, but adsk is a company listed in the bag, it is not the faibenefratelli. Of course their primary purpose is to make money. a user who has not updated the software for 10 years can no longer consider a "old customer"; and we are talking about an autocad lt license that costs, compared to the products "full", a tobacco pipe (for those who did not know, rent acdlt 2020 now costs a euro per day).
I don't know if "Previous versions" refer only to those paired with a active maintenance plan, because otherwise the thing collides with what communicated in a June 2015 email
I still agree with you, if they do something, it's because they know they can do it. 
Forgive me, but your consideration on the faibenefratelli makes no sense.. .
I don't know what to say. when installing a software you accept the terms and conditions of use. if in these it is written that if you do not eat at least once a month the pasta and beans remove the license, you are the ones who have accepted it! as when I make a contract with a telephone operator and tell me that I will pay 10€ per month forever, but then there is the clause of the adjustments istat and after 2 years I find myself to pay 12€. What can I do? operator change! with adsk is equal. Are they dishonest? We don't read what we sign!
for the 2d by now there are sufficient economic or open solutions to shoot, but with only 2d soon you will make to bring home bread
wtf? ? No one puts the gun on your head! You're free to go for other lids. What do you have to accept? It's not a regime! !
the tristan point of view is that of one who (it seems to remember) is tied to autodesk from the working point of view (if I mistaken correct me).
not wrong on the first point but wrong on the second. I'm often very critical of self-desk, who knows me knows, but I'm more than sure that to do such a thing if it has been studied for good for years, since it is followed by law firms of a certain thickness and not by the sewn that works well and lashes little.
In fact, what is written on the license is not at all told that it respects the law, the problem is to prove it in court and have to collide with top-notch lawyers.
This is your thought, and as long as you do the engineer and not the judge will remain your thought.
undoubtedly. It was a shock to me when I read about it, thinking about the "old customers" crap. But as I said earlier, if you have wide shoulders and you're sure you're right, go to court to assert your rights. Otherwise there are chatter between tarallucci and wine.