is not the spirit of the forum do tasks.If you can. otherwise it is also good to tell me how to proceed. I know it's not the best to ask, but I'm really desperate.
arrows in the a-a section usually indicate the direction of tipping the saw. the verse should be reversed; For the rest, geometrically you should be there.Good evening, I tried to make a draft. I think we need two views to show that there are 4 holes. quotas, tolerances and roughness are still lacking. In the meantime, can you tell me if I'm on the right track? Thank you.
the arrows of the aa section are well directed upwards, but this design is to be put under, according to the European system, because you see from above, the piece dissected.Good evening, I tried to make a draft. I think we need two views to show that there are 4 holes. quotas, tolerances and roughness are still lacking. In the meantime, can you tell me if I'm on the right track? Thank you.
if I considered the American method would be properly arranged the views?the arrows of the aa section are well directed upwards, but this design is to be put under, according to the European system, because you see from above, the piece dissected.
Can you be clearer, please?the arrows of the aa section are well directed upwards, but this design is to be put under, according to the European system, because you see from above, the piece dissected.
I think he meant to reverse the views.Can you be clearer, please?
I wouldn't understand what criterion. your tipping is correct and is not "American"; are just the arrows that do not have the right direction. I do not think there is any norm that requires the view in the plant to be below and the section above.. .I think he meant to reverse the views.
Yes and, even arrows.if I considered the American method would be properly arranged the views?
if you check the circles well, you see that the piece in section, is seen from the top down, then the design above should be put under. we are in Europe and we must use this system.Can you be clearer, please?
Who said that? the tipping is at the European and where you turn the section is at the discretion of the designer. no system imposes me to put the view in the plant below and the section above.if you check the circles well, you see that the piece in section, is seen from the top down, then the design above should be put under. we are in Europe and we must use this system.
it is also necessary to put in the drawing its symbol.
there are so many odds. also better avoid quotating "in series"; try to think from where the tool enters and from where it would take reference to leave. Finally, when it comes to turning pieces, the design would be better readable if it was oriented with the rotation axis horizontally placed.Good evening, I tried to make the quotation. I think there are two bevels on the cone at the base (may I indicate them in those not listed in the cartiglio?). same speech for the meetings. I put some red asterisks in.
because the design consists of two only views, one above the other, the one above can only be the prospectus (view in front), although dissected; that below is the view in the plant (view from above) with all concentric circles.Who said that? the tipping is at the European and where you turn the section is at the discretion of the designer. no system imposes me to put the view in the plant below and the section above.