uragano
Guest
Hi there
I referred to gp. that x me did not justify the expense x the novelties he described.
I referred to gp. that x me did not justify the expense x the novelties he described.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
autocad 2016 - news
- Thread starter PlannerRoad
- Start date
-
- Tags
- autocad - notizie
lattu
Guest
I keep not understanding and how your first messages in the forum did not start great. in the rules of the forum asks first to present itself (in the dedicated section) and to keep quiet tones. You know, don't be rude or we can ban you. Thank you.
uragano
Guest
Hi there
It doesn't seem to me that my tones are not peaceful, I just want to reiterate what I think, then if you want to ban those who think otherwise you do as you want. But if you want to make a constructive discussion, people can express their opinions.
with my thought I greet you
It doesn't seem to me that my tones are not peaceful, I just want to reiterate what I think, then if you want to ban those who think otherwise you do as you want. But if you want to make a constructive discussion, people can express their opinions.
with my thought I greet you
MassiVonWeizen
Guest
to make a constructive discussion you have to argue your argument and sayIf you want to make a constructive discussion,people can express their opinions.
It does not seem to me that it adds anything to the discussion nor, above all, introduces a technical opinion that creates an exchange of arguments.You can do it. to justify expenditure?
As for the peaceful tones lattu referred to this phrase that underlies a malafede or an inability of the subject.
So it explains why expenditure is unjustified or justified, it is unclear what you mean since you say
that the opposite of your first statement. brings your experience with the software and where it should go parare.I was referring to gp. that x me did not justify the expense x the novelties he described.
GP.
Guest
No, it's just a different rendering engine.Dopi your post I did a search. I read that they replaced it with something they call "rapid rt".
that is a simplified version (i.e. truncated), of the previous one?
mmmm... I do not share, what about the cloud of points, in how many have to do with all those using autocad?Well, considering the size of people making autocad renderings, I'm not surprised. . .
with mental ray the level of rendering was greatly improved, is it hoped that this engine will change my mind, otherwise what improvements are we talking about?
It would be worth using zwcad.
Is that a joke? I have no words. I'm curious to do some tests.
the problem is that the management of the lights is completely different, having to remake a render from a dwg of a previous version comes almost completely white.it would be interesting to see the difference of a render made with a previous version and the last with the rapid rt.
As long as I don't take my hand a positive aspect at least has it, it really is "rapid"...
GP.
Guest
welcome to the forum and good the first, we felt the lack of enlightened viewers.but are you doing or are you there to justify the shopping?
when I wrote the post by now I bought the update, with "ordinary" I was referring to the packaging of the next image, are capsules to be used for excessive discharge problems from the... [desinenza del tuo nick].
However don't worry, I gain well and am rich in family, the fact is that I would like to spend much more...
Tristan
Guest
considering the fact that now the cloud of points you create also with a smartphone from 90€...:wink:mmmm... I do not share, what about the cloud of points, in how many have to do with all those using autocad?
c3kkos
Guest
for me autocad stopped in 2014.
since 2008 has made many progress, a nice restyling since 2009, good version but acerba,
greatness and few news on 2010
idem 2011
idem 2012
idem 2013
idem 2014
with 2015 you have seen the force to tear the plug to the old "classic" dear that I love and think better and want to tear money to customers smoking good eyes
Moreover the absurd slowness of '15 (especially for the suckers introduced with the infamous screen "startup") forced me to return to good'ol 2014, which I use daily.
personally, if it wasn't for some features that have come in the last versions, and that now are indispensable, I could even return to 2005 lt
It is a fortune for self-desk that has always preferred its product compared to the honourable microstation of bentley (very clean interface, but I cannot bear the feeling and the mechanics of drawing) because at least until two years ago a little money from me has had it.
of course these are very personal opinions, but it is clear that I am extremely convinced of everything I have written,
I also add that the improvements made to the "autocad compartment 3d" are irrelevant to me, since for such autocad use it is simply *inadeguated*
since 2008 has made many progress, a nice restyling since 2009, good version but acerba,
greatness and few news on 2010
idem 2011
idem 2012
idem 2013
idem 2014
with 2015 you have seen the force to tear the plug to the old "classic" dear that I love and think better and want to tear money to customers smoking good eyes
Moreover the absurd slowness of '15 (especially for the suckers introduced with the infamous screen "startup") forced me to return to good'ol 2014, which I use daily.
personally, if it wasn't for some features that have come in the last versions, and that now are indispensable, I could even return to 2005 lt
It is a fortune for self-desk that has always preferred its product compared to the honourable microstation of bentley (very clean interface, but I cannot bear the feeling and the mechanics of drawing) because at least until two years ago a little money from me has had it.
of course these are very personal opinions, but it is clear that I am extremely convinced of everything I have written,
I also add that the improvements made to the "autocad compartment 3d" are irrelevant to me, since for such autocad use it is simply *inadeguated*
Saru
Guest
I don't know as much as you can say mine?
I'm hating 2016.
continuous irreversible errors, closures without reason.. and not only on my pc... it happens on all three workstations on which it was installed.
That's all.
I'm hating 2016.
continuous irreversible errors, closures without reason.. and not only on my pc... it happens on all three workstations on which it was installed.
That's all.
Legs
Guest
@saru
But did you do all the updates? If I'm not mistaken, a couple of service packs came out.
I also use it (under windows7) and it works perfectly. I'm amazed at the lack of crash and more.
But did you do all the updates? If I'm not mistaken, a couple of service packs came out.
I also use it (under windows7) and it works perfectly. I'm amazed at the lack of crash and more.
PlannerRoad
Guest
only hotfixes have emerged, three in the current state for accuracy (other are for localized versions of other languages), service pack not yet anything.@saru
But did you do all the updates? If I'm not wrong a couple of service packs came out.
I also use it (under windows7) and it works perfectly. I'm amazed at the lack of crash and more.
Saru
Guest
Hello, everyone!
you all updated! I also have win7
It's something I just can't understand! to my colleague this morning from problems by inserting a block with attributes. Huh boh!
I have already reinstalled for another problem.. therefore it is not assessable as a solution.
you all updated! I also have win7
It's something I just can't understand! to my colleague this morning from problems by inserting a block with attributes. Huh boh!
I have already reinstalled for another problem.. therefore it is not assessable as a solution.
Legs
Guest
@plannerroad
thanks for the clarification. I went to memory and actually wasn't accurate.
@saru
You know that could then be some incompatibility with some software. maybe the antivirus, graphics card drivers etc. etc.
you could try updating the graphics card drivers. Maybe with the latest version, something gets fixed.
thanks for the clarification. I went to memory and actually wasn't accurate.
@saru
You know that could then be some incompatibility with some software. maybe the antivirus, graphics card drivers etc. etc.
you could try updating the graphics card drivers. Maybe with the latest version, something gets fixed.
Marvel64
Guest
only for love of truth, in the new release of autocad has not been eliminated mental ray, a new engine has been implemented for rapid rendering, active by default, which is called rapid rt.in autocad there was something I appreciated: mental rayThey took her away. .
to activate mental ray again it is enough to set the system variable makengine to 0
GP.
Guest
after my post you mentioned, I took some time to look for the right rendering settings with the new rapid rt, completely different from mentalray.only for love of truth.... it is enough to set the system variable makengine to 0
after taking my hand I admit I have also changed my opinion, not so much for quality, to parer my excellent although not at mr levels, as for the calculation speed, in a test now tried step from 32 seconds (mentalray) to 5 seconds (rapid rt).
I see that makingngine is mentioned in a knowledge base solution of 6 July, and is therefore one variable not documentedWhat I'm asking is, why caxxo? ? ?
Thanks for "love" reporting. :smile:
ARKLisp
Guest
Why? Good question.
in the last 10 years the autodesk policy has accustomed us to slow or sudden changes, with choices of development of questionable software and in many cases difficult to understand.
but to all this there is only one explanation: It's called marketing.
I read previous interventions just as opinable... where it is punctually painted an indigenous 3d autocad or worthy of being abandoned to a safe death in comparison with the latest software.
if it were all true what someone autocad said would have been abandoned more than 10 years ago, and not only by its developers.
But we're still here talking about it. . .
autocad remains and will remain for a long time the most flexible and versatile software cad for design and design,
to the face even of the most blasoned and innovative bim software of last generation.
Of course it is my very modest opinion.
a warm greeting to the whole community of cad3d.
arklispwww.facebook.com/arklisp
in the last 10 years the autodesk policy has accustomed us to slow or sudden changes, with choices of development of questionable software and in many cases difficult to understand.
but to all this there is only one explanation: It's called marketing.
I read previous interventions just as opinable... where it is punctually painted an indigenous 3d autocad or worthy of being abandoned to a safe death in comparison with the latest software.
if it were all true what someone autocad said would have been abandoned more than 10 years ago, and not only by its developers.
But we're still here talking about it. . .
autocad remains and will remain for a long time the most flexible and versatile software cad for design and design,
to the face even of the most blasoned and innovative bim software of last generation.
Of course it is my very modest opinion.
a warm greeting to the whole community of cad3d.
arklispwww.facebook.com/arklisp
rpor66
Guest
I installed the 2016 x64 version on 2 pcs with different hardware but identical result: apparently works, start the command which, message "unknown command", draw a box, works, add in the quick access bar the workspace command, irreversible error.
Is it just me?
Is it just me?
Legs
Guest
@rpor66
now the command called iupers (otherwise you can always use _cui with the indent of initial stress).
I have no problem with irreversible error.
now the command called iupers (otherwise you can always use _cui with the indent of initial stress).
I have no problem with irreversible error.
rpor66
Guest
thanks for the info, even if I tried to use the menu command with the same result.
I'll keep testing.
I'll keep testing.
PlannerRoad
Guest
the command which, although replaced by iupers, still works normally (even without underscore).