autocad lt on laptop - separate graphics card vs integrated

[amaze1]

Hello, everyone, I hope I don't bother you too much.
project plants (electric) on my laptop for several years now, at studio I have an external monitor, but sometimes I use directly on the 15.6" 1366x768 at home to benefit me, finish some detail etc. I convenient to have a machine easily transportable, for many reasons. Recently, by hobby, I do some modeling for 3d print online or with fusion 360.
now I would like to pass to a new car before the current leave me on foot (an i7 of 2013 with nvidia geforce gt540m 1mb, so much to make you understand what you are talking about) and I was about to take one of the i7-10510u + gx250 2gb, if not going to exit the updated version with an i7-1165g7 and ... intel iris xe integrated with shared memory. both are 2-in-1 with 16gb 15.6" fhd and comparable prices.
Frankly I don't know how much my job actually commits the graphics card, so I have difficulty in choosing whether to buy the first or wait for the second one right away.
Besides, there seems to be a nice performance gap between the processors, I didn't think: comparazione cpuAny suggestions?

 

[Cristallo]

iris performance is identical to mx250.
autocad does not take advantage in particular of the dedicated video card, uses the directx (which both support in declination v12)
have a dedicated video card but allows you to choose. if you have problems with one, maybe you activate the other (which with the one exclusively embedded you can not do).
to you the choice.

 

[amaze1]

Thank you so much for the attention and the tips, I didn't think about it.
Let's see if on the American website answers me about the date of release of the new model in black, here in Italy you just can't talk to us ...

 

[amaze1]

the assistance of the use says that the new model "element black" (with active pen and its integrated housing) should exit in mid- or late October.
Meanwhile I discovered that the 17" model is as large as my current 15.6" laptop and includes the mx350, although the 4k display could be a beautiful "zavorra" both in terms of graphic speed and battery consumption.
I have done some evidence on my current system and the difference between nvidia and integrated intel feels on the cad in terms of reactivity.

 

[Cristallo]

attention to monitor 4k. with autocad is hardly manageable. I happened to see installations on a 15,6 4k, with microscopic icons and you want to change the settings, the only way to make it usable was to lower the resolution to the wxga rectory or at most to fullhd. but having to do it from windows.... means seeing the other programs as well

at least until 2017, after I don't know if management improved

 

[amaze1]

attention to monitor 4k. with autocad is hardly manageable. I happened to see installations on a 15,6 4k, with microscopic icons and you want to change the settings, the only way to make it usable was to lower the resolution to the wxga rectory or at most to fullhd. but having to do it from windows.... means seeing the other programs as well

at least until 2017, after I don't know if management improved

thanks crystal, also this is a useful information that confirms me in my decision to point on the fhd rather than on the 4k.