enri
Guest
in fact I read now the confirmation, that two witnesses have seen to throw the anchor to a firm ship. But then how the hell did he turn south like that, just the currents from the north?
right now they said that somehow they try to break it because it's moving 7mm an hour.a question for exa:
Since it is very close to the coast, in order to avoid the tides to move it and make it uninhabited, there are no systems to tie it with peaks to the cliff so as to limit its movement?
safety zone, pull everything with signs and fences and do not bring anyone, radius 150 meters (if the ropes or chains are 100 meters)I'm going to the eye. . .
the breaking stretch of a "normal" steel is about 5%. or when you put the two pieces of audition close.
We say that at maximum length, on the stretch you have a 40% yielding (that 5%) and a 60% elasticity. therefore to break, the "frusted" is a return of about 7.5% of the length of the rope.
If the rope and 100m will notice 7.5m... I don't know if I explain.. .
the cable roads, (so we call them) are "in the air" (see attachment) so there are not in this case, tubing to flood....for example the pipes of electric cables ) which are gradually filling with water decreasing the residual float of the ship
but yes, the security systems are there. then the chains if they break do not whip contrary to the cables (the one of the man cut in two I heard it too).safety zone, pull everything with signs and fences and do not bring anyone, radius 150 meters (if the ropes or chains are 100 meters)
So much is not a definitive thing ... those two or three years necessary for emptying the reclamation and dismantling:
I am aware of the fact that from afar it is impossible to make a correct assessment, we lack too much data.the cable roads, (so we call them) are "in the air" (see attachment) so there are not in this case, tubing to flood.
however the more time passes and the more decreases the float. In theory it shouldn't be bad. less floatability, less sensitivity to wind and currents even if the mass invested by the currents of the sea is remarkable.
but yes, the security systems are there. then the chains if they break do not whip contrary to the cables (the one of the man cut in two I heard it too).
We're still in an unclear phase. too many voices and too many versions, the last I heard is that the submarine can actually and further so the hull at the moment does not run the risk of disappearing. It's hard to get a clear idea by hearing the news. interested only to know if sketch entertained cultural relations with Moldova.
but this is the tv of mara venier, of shock barbarian and of gentlemen. . .
If they do something like that, it's just because they're AmericanThis view seems to make the idea better.
This is a battleship, smaller than the hotel, up to 40,000 tons, but if one wants, everything can be done, just spend the money (of whom?).
notice how many people with the cannello in their hand, after half an hour, who is working to tear down the hull and try to save those closed inside (without success).
the ship of the photos of the president is the uss oklahoma sunk on 7 December 1941.How long have they used to set up such a recovery system? However coast and seabed seem different from those of the lily.
You should see the drawings of the structure or the development of the template.I have a question for you technical "acquophones" :
the thickness of the sheet that has torn with the collision, what thickness does it have?
Sorry if the question is trivial, but I have no idea. :redface:
Thanks for the answer.You should see the drawings of the structure or the development of the template.
the barrel took it in the "ginocchio" which is one of the points where the thickness is consistent.
looking at the cafiero, for ships of a length greater than 175m is indicated a thickness of 23mm. but it is an indicative value.
After the shock, the rudder stuck all to "dritta" compensated for the disconnection, then twisted the scrap that landed on the spot where it arose.the complete course.
He seems to want to demolish the cliff, then he reconsidered. . .