• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

coast concordia and cheerful

but there was to be a plan b, because if they had sent it to the Turks, however they had to charge it, if the year booked a way must be, that I know, to get to a fishing of 16.
In my opinion, but certainly wrong, vanguard was never the first choice and was held as an extreme solution in case something had not gone well since it would entail a substantial change to the whole project, the bins were more emptied (or increased in number) to obtain a greater boost. this would have resulted in increased stress on the "trave-ship" considered perhaps excessive for the current conditions of the hull.
Clearly. It's just hypotheses. for greater security it would be necessary to possess the data and a degree in naval engineering.
Moreover, having a fishing of 18 meters has narrowed the number of Italian ports able to accommodate the wreck and has precluded the entry in a basin of famine where the operations could be carried out with greater tranquility, phase that will probably happen later, after the demolition of the superstructures and the consequent lightening of the ship.

moral: if you could lift the ship until you fish it 10-12 meters... Why not?
 
the left side of the ship has already lifted about one meter
 

Attachments

  • Immagine 01.webp
    Immagine 01.webp
    170 KB · Views: 13
  • Immagine 02.webp
    Immagine 02.webp
    184.3 KB · Views: 12
  • Immagine 03.webp
    Immagine 03.webp
    176.2 KB · Views: 9
Luckily today's cloud didn't hit the lily.
the ship happily lifted two meters and was moved 30 m.
we hope the weather regga for the time necessary.
 
the concordy coast is leaving. Good last trip.
congratulations, of heart, to all those who have participated in this great project.
 

Attachments

  • Immagine.webp
    Immagine.webp
    196.9 KB · Views: 4
Of course, putting her back on track would have been a real moral slap to that pusillanim of her former commander. . .
 
That beats the baby... he must be invited to the parties and throws away the 34 dead and the economic damage he has caused. only the ship cost almost 500 mil. I do not intend to quantify because there are no figures.. .
 
Let us reopen this discussion temporarily.
Some posts back, we had discussed demolitions in foreign countries and in particular in Turkish where, it was said, probably the rules are less restrictive than in Italy.
Well, I'm going to give you a video and some photos that show enough how demolitions happen in this country. between the ships there are the cheerful coast in the last photo, (already mentioned), the famous hms invincible, oil tankers, etc. etc.
You can see that there is no means of containment for the sea crossing of pollutants, such as the most basic pollution and safety standards.
we are in aliağa, a town in the center of the homonymous district, in the province of smirne from which it is about 50 kilometers.
In reality it is a huge landfill and a real city of naval demolition.
what frightens is the absolute tranquility of accepting cargo ships of everything.. .
look at the video because it is really spectacular.
admirable the aim of the temporary "commandante".. :biggrin:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qyltdonj2ie
748-Aliaga-a.webp1490424.webp1599221.webparticle-2003673-0C91DFBD00000578-360_964x584.webp1355154598.webp
 
Last edited:
Hello exa....... .
I think what I'm writing is pure euphoricism.
I know full of work
in your photos I counted at least ten ships
in Italy to dismantle "one" a couple of years of discussions
the question I ask
Why are we not competitive?
How much pollution does it cost?
Is it the cost of the workmanship? organization of work?
logistics?
but if we all have sti prob.
because we do not eliminate the yards of factories foundries studies of prog. engineers architects etc.
and we give to agriculture that without chemistry
and tourism
I think it's a difficult moment to answer
and I also think we put a lot of stakes to properly avoid pollution
but we have not created alternatives
we are without work
thank you very much
 
Hello exa....... .
I think what I'm writing is pure euphoricism.
I know full of work
in your photos I counted at least ten ships
in Italy to dismantle "one" a couple of years of discussions
the question I ask
Why are we not competitive?
How much pollution does it cost?
Is it the cost of the workmanship? organization of work?
logistics?
but if we all have sti prob.
because we do not eliminate the yards of factories foundries studies of prog. engineers architects etc.
and we give to agriculture that without chemistry
and tourism
I think it's a difficult moment to answer
and I also think we put a lot of stakes to properly avoid pollution
but we have not created alternatives
we are without work
thank you very much
hi shi and good year.
It is a legitimate question, but as you have predicted, to which it is extremely difficult to answer.
certainly we cannot be competitive when we are imposed rules that our neighbor ignores.
to us is set the car "euro x" to zero emissions, with hypercatalytical marmittone, gasoline without octane etc. etc.
then we go to the dealer who puts the last "green powered" with a price from outseries and in return we withdraw our scrap "euro nothing", smoking and polluting as a coal central of the 800. we return home happy to have helped the planet survive (or prolong it to agony) but with much lighter wallet.
Meanwhile our "ex", poor cause of the environmental disaster, instead of being demolished, is loaded on a cargo destination "paese no-regole" where it will return to grinding km with a gasoline rich of octane, without substantiating to boring revisions, with pads of the charged brakes of asbestos that so well brake... etc.
If we were to visit one of these countries, maybe just cross the Adriatic... Who knows... maybe we could meet her and move us by remembering our sacrifice for the good of humanity.

p.s. photos are just some... on the net there are many more.
minskkk... With such a beast!
makes more practice than grammar... :wink:
 
hi shi and good year.
It is a legitimate question, but as you have predicted, to which it is extremely difficult to answer.
certainly we cannot be competitive when we are imposed rules that our neighbor ignores.
to us is set the car "euro x" to zero emissions, with hypercatalytical marmittone, gasoline without octane etc. etc.
then we go to the dealer who puts the last "green powered" with a price from outseries and in return we withdraw our scrap "euro nothing", smoking and polluting as a coal central of the 800. we return home happy to have helped the planet survive (or prolong it to agony) but with much lighter wallet.
Meanwhile our "ex", poor cause of the environmental disaster, instead of being demolished, is loaded on a cargo destination "paese no-regole" where it will return to grinding km with a gasoline rich of octane, without substantiating to boring revisions, with pads of the charged brakes of asbestos that so well brake... etc.
If we were to visit one of these countries, maybe just cross the Adriatic... Who knows... maybe we could meet her and move us by remembering our sacrifice for the good of humanity.

p.s. photos are just some... on the net there are many more.

makes more practice than grammar... :wink:
So, exa? How do you get out of the impasse? ?
It would be better if we all did, but since everyone doesn't do it........... Should we all do it backwards? ?
or not do it??? :biggrin:
The alternative is that some, the + stupid or the + furbi (this is to be seen) behave properly or not?
yourself in a previous post write:"what frightens is the absolute tranquility of accepting cargo ships of everything... "but we will see, in the meantime good year, by the way big photos, now I sew the footage on the tube
Hi.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top