external constraints

[Strumpf]

Hello dear old friends.
To the newest ones I introduce myself, I am a very old man of this magnificent portal, I have been quite absent, because of a life, we say different
Pocche weeks ago, I started working for a company that uses nx, coming from big experience with solidworks, of course I am with a lot of effort, some for habits issues, others for various limitations.
I am here, therefore, to ask you a lot of questions.
I mean if I have two parts in a set, block and bracket, and I want to make holes on the bracket, in the same position as the block holes. the posiziono with the snap, but then I see that cmq. He did not take the bond, that is the point and placed them, but not being bound, in time, he goes a little around as he pleases. not to compare, but for example, in solidworks you can decide whether to hold the bonds between the parts or not. I can't find it in nx.
so it is possible or not, to make the bonds between objects of a sketch part1 and objects part2? (I understand in a simple way, without having to make wave or expressions or quotas to 0 etc...)
thanks in advance!

 

[Dottor_Scott]

come from solidworks.. Happy birthday! it happened to me too, there is to go crazy

Let's see, maybe there's some confusion between various subjects.

Then:

- in a set, to bind the parts among themselves, do as in solidworks:
ribbon bar \ axiemi \wincoli axiemi (in the component position section)
otherwise menu\ assimi \ component position \ constraints together

there are various types of constraints, many couplings you make with the touch / align
(i.e. alignment contact). the constraints remain, if you do not erase them

once you place the components, if you want to change a component, for
example make the hole on the block, click dx on the name of the part in the axiemi browser
or double click in the graphics area on the component and you can change it.
the hole can do so by also selecting other geometric elements of other parts, provided
the context is selected on set (high sx, after 'menu' and after 'no selection filter')

so do a hole in correspondence of the other, but it is not associative.
you do it with the wave

I have been too quick, if anything you ask and clarify, I have to run away otherwise
I lose the train.

 

[cacciatorino]

Hello dear old friends.
To the newest ones I introduce myself, I am a very old man of this magnificent portal, I have been quite absent, because of a life, we say different

Dearest, Welcome back!!! :biggrin::biggrin::

 

[ceschi1959]

come from solidworks.. Happy birthday! it happened to me too, there is to go crazy

from information certain in my possession the softwarists of siemens have put hidden program lines that telepathically capture who comes from or simply approached sw and makes him mad at the best of the hypotheses. other effects are so tragic that I do not tell them for charity of homeland. :wink::wink::wink::wink:

Hello dear old friends.
I mean if I have two parts in a set, block and bracket, and I want to make holes on the bracket, in the same position as the block holes. the posiziono with the snap, but then I see that cmq. He did not take the bond, that is the point and placed them, but not being bound, in time, he goes a little around as he pleases. not to compare, but for example, in solidworks you can decide whether to hold the bonds between the parts or not. I can't find it in nx.
so it is possible or not, to make the bonds between objects of a sketch part1 and objects part2? (I understand in a simple way, without having to make wave or expressions or quotas to 0 etc...)
thanks in advance!

I answer: mass hip!!! You will understand me as I come from mooolto near schio (maran)!

ban on jokes, follow the advice of Dr_scott but studied at the same time well, and perhaps with an experienced user alongside, the peculiarities of the axioms that are not so trivial.
I give to you and I always remember when I pass to other cad is to do tabula flavor methodologies learned and start again from scratch.
Good luck!

 

[Strumpf]

Dearest, Welcome back!!! :biggrin::biggrin::

thanks hunter,
well found

Thanks, guys, I get it.
I'm trying to lose mindset swx, but some things seem to me that they should be generic for all cads, in fact I'm very surprised that you can't make the whole sketch constraints.
I know. because a piece and already went wrong in the workshop because the holes did not update

I would say that it's true, every time I make some comparisons between swx and nx, he gets.... And it does terrible things to me. every time he can do one thing on the contrary (like assemblies in the together) he does it on the contrary.
but we plan with patience, we will make peace
See you soon.

 

[Dottor_Scott]

from information certain in my possession the softwarists of siemens have put hidden program lines that telepathically capture who comes from or simply approached sw and makes him mad at the best of the hypotheses. other effects are so tragic that I do not tell them for charity of homeland. :wink::wink::wink::wink:

(...cut...) )

I think so.
seriously speaking, I found myself terrible at first but actually
It was my fault. sw you learn almost.. Intuition, when you know those 4 basic notions
The rest of you fill it up, consult the help when you have something new
and go

nx needs real study, put there a topic at a time and understand it
All the way. great help comes from the help, which, in my opinion,
is done very well (and in Italian)

 

[Utente NX]

nx has many gaps, compared to solidworks, but the boys of the nx forum, not knowing it think that solidworks is a simple middle-end cad.

 

[DirtyPaw]

Hi.
I have just started with nx.. I have to say among the various environments the axieme is certainly the least digestible.
I think there's no other way in the sketcher if there's no wave link.. but I think it weighs not a little bit on the regeneration speed of the part and it often takes me if I try to change them.. :