greenhouse in solidworks

[Mustang123]

Hello, everyone.
My name is angel and I'm new to the forum.
I've already introduced myself, but don't spoil it here.

I am a 33 year professional free mechanical engineer and I recently started my approach to solidworks.

I have to make 3d greenhouses and I want to know if anyone can help me.

I speak of 2 hectares of greenhouses to be clearly represented, because then another person will have to enter some machinery and plants.
Thank you in advance.

Good job.
Angel.

 

[marcof]

I have to make 3d greenhouses and I want to know if anyone can help me.

Don't you think you're a little vague?
of types there are not few and all different. try to circumstigate better and probably someone will be able to help you.

 

[Mustang123]

Bye.
You're probably right. . .
allego 2 files, so the photos speak from themselves.
1 hectare of greenhouses has roof to canvases, 1 hectare to glass, but for the rest extension, heights and various sizes are equal.

Thank you.
Angel.

 

[Max-C]

Hello, everyone.
My name is angel and I'm new to the forum.
I've already introduced myself, but don't spoil it here.

I am a 33 year professional free mechanical engineer and I recently started my approach to solidworks.

I have to make 3d greenhouses and I want to know if anyone can help me.

I speak of 2 hectares of greenhouses to be clearly represented, because then another person will have to enter some machinery and plants.
Thank you in advance.

Good job.
Angel.

Well if the question is: "Who helps me draw it" I think no one (unless you also give us the pay then...:tongue, if the question is "who helps me understand the functions to use in solidworks as unexperienced" then you have some chance that we can help you... Did you throw something down in the cad? the welding tutorial present within the software can be of great help at least to give you the way...

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

to define mainly the specifications of the contract. What is required?
all bolted leashes or welded and bolted parts?
distinct cutting, development of any sheet or simple construction designs that then arrange the workshop?
possibility of changes? if yes, read (any length, beam section...) or heavy (constructive span, greenhouse sections)?
Structural calculations? if yes, with the full or standard version (in the latter it is not possible to do simulations on axes or multibody)?

fundamental to do tutorials to not be cheated what are the structural members?
insert the version of the program to not do posts where it is said that you do not open files that are shared or that you give advice on functions that have varied over time.

based on the answers that you give a solution can be to make a basic sketch with the plant and the location of the spans, make a subaxieme or a multibody part of the span then use the sketch as a guide of the plant to repeat having the possibility to manage the distances individually.

 

[Mustang123]

Bye.
@max-c: I don't think it's the right way to welcome a newbie of solidworks and the forum. I didn't ask anyone to give me the drawing or I'd like a "chance" to help me. if I joined the forum (as everyone) is because I need help.
I would like only a starting point with solidworks.

@massivonweizen: it is not a design, but a representation only to indicate the encumbrances and spaces. a colleague of mine will then have to enter plants and machinery and only need to know if they are there, as it will insert the machinery that he already has in solidworks as parts in the global axieme greenhouse. So I don't need welding, joints or other production executives.

I just need a starting point or some key function that I probably don't know.

the version is solidworks 2014.

Thank you.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

What do you have in your hand over the photos? What do you know about the program? Do you have dwg of the structure?
banally: draws the front view span, extruding tot, repeating n° times with known distance.

If your partner can use the program and they need the encumbrance that structure does it in half an hour... .

 

[Mustang123]

I have complete photos and relief. I did the dwg of the plant, but the procedure you indicated me you know it in sw, so I will proceed like this.
Or could I start from the complete plant?
Thank you.

 

[marcof]

@massivonweizen: it is not a design, but a representation only to indicate the space and space

then simplify everything to the maximum. do the goats as unique parts that represent large lines the structures of the real ones. idem for support mounts, any internal bumps at greenhouses etc. Assemble everything in one or two assemblies using some sketch as a layout for the encumbrances of the various greenhouses, position of the supports of the whims etc. you probably don't even need to make covers in cloths or glass.
assuming that you can use a minimum program in part environment and together you will only need simple sketches and basic functions (extrusions, cuts and revolutions if you have circular elements)

I just need a starting point or some key function that I probably don't know.

the key functions would have been those of the structural elements, but for what you have to do it is not worth it.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

the plant you can only use it to have under the eye the encumbrances and never bind some sketches.

 

[Mustang123]

Okay. thanks for the availability.

Angel.

 

[xxfast]

I would do it with autocads like that?

 

[New Rider]

Hello everyone,
a job like that only to verify the encumbrances and/or spaces in my opinion should be done with a 2d starting from the view from the top of the plant. then hand-held insert us inside ( always in 2d view from above) the various equipment placing them according to the needs. lower the time and cost of shaping the whole structure. .

 

[marcof]

I would do it with autocads like that?

You're asking yourself a question. let us know also the answer

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

lower the time and cost of shaping the whole structure. .

as I said to mustang123 if you know how to use the program and you just have to see the encumbrances a similar structure do it in half an hour; we make half a day between various issues and structural definitions that obviously do not appear from photos. (you take the section of the camp, you give it a clean autocad and you care. then and only to do extrusions and repetitions)
draw it in 2d and convert the 3d of the colleague to 2d definitely commits you at least double

 

[New Rider]

as I said to mustang123 if you know how to use the program and you just have to see the encumbrances a similar structure do it in half an hour; we make half a day between various issues and structural definitions that obviously do not appear from photos. (you take the section of the camp, you give it a clean autocad and you care. then and only to do extrusions and repetitions)
draw it in 2d and convert the 3d of the colleague to 2d definitely commits you at least double

Now I have no clear what to place but in my opinion if it already made a dwg plant of the various bearing structures with a view from above would only fit the equipment. beyond all you should understand what kind of equipment are. In my opinion, not knowing well the type of work and however of equipment, I would see it well in 2d the work.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

if you already made a dwg plant of the various bearing structures with a view from above would just insert the equipment.

of course the accounts and the choice of what to do if it has to make them luoi, but the encumbrances in height as you do if you only have a plant? the greenhouse has different heights because it has the tilted roof and the counter-ventures you have to consider

 

[New Rider]

of course the accounts and the choice of what to do if it has to make them luoi, but the encumbrances in height as you do if you only have a plant? the greenhouse has different heights because it has the tilted roof and the counter-ventures you have to consider

In fact, not knowing what to put in, we do not know what the best way is. just your reasoning for the incumbents in height, but I repeat , if for example it must insert that there are 80 cm tall florists or flower tables for display typical of the greenhouses, or maybe see and divide the zone of trampling from that of plantation does not need the vertical encumbrance.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

mustan123 writes in post #6

a colleague of mine will then have to enter plants and machinery and only need to know if they are there, as it will insert the machinery that he already has in solidworks as parts in the global axieme greenhouse

.

as it is proposed it seems that heights are important. then it is always to play deducing information perhaps not appropriate but clarifying

 

[marcof]

Now I have no clear what to place but in my opinion if it already made a dwg plant of the various bearing structures with a view from above would only fit the equipment. beyond all you should understand what kind of equipment are. In my opinion, not knowing well the type of work and however of equipment, I would see it well in 2d the work.

makes the plant in 2d, then if by misfortune he needs a side view and god does not want also a front and some section that takes inside the inserted machine he finds himself, as in timing, beautiful than fucked. if then it has to change the layout of the plant and of the machines inserted then, compared to having the 3d made in swx, the losses of time due to the use of an anachronistic instrument will multiply even more.
making a schematic structure in 3d of a greenhouse of the genus constituted by a series of whirlwinds and whimsical is such a bisk that the idea of thinking of the 2d should not even come