inventor e/o solid works

[goccia]

I bring you the answer of a designer ing of an Italian aeronautical reality guide: generally solid works, autocad or pro engineering... apart from catia obviously. bye!"

 

[marcof]

the question of drop, which lost the discussion, was very simple: better for inv or swx work outlets? to a question like this mail from a person who is still studying the most sensible answer would be that of draw to lot

I refer to the answer of a designer ing of an Italian aeronautical reality guide: generally solid works, autocad o pro engineering... partly Cat ovviamente. bye!".

cvd...
Use cheese:you will get equally reliable and decisive results.

 

[goccia]

autocad and catia I know them, so. .solidworks. closed and thank you all.

 

[Lettore espatriato]

Thanks to you drop.
It's served to me all in all.
Oh, if one's wrong, he's wrong. If 4 people so experienced tell me so, I repent and apologize!
:36_1_4:

 

[Lettore espatriato]

cvd...
Use cheese:View attachment 40835you will get equally reliable and decisive results.

Okay.
I had a different impression reading some of the job offers here on cad3d:http://www.cad3d.it/forum1/threads/45408-progettista-disegnathttp://www.cad3d.it/forum1/threads/44653-progettisti-meccanici-unigraphics-torinohttp://www.cad3d.it/forum1/threads/43931-ricerco-progettista-meccanico-uso-solidworkshttp://www.cad3d.it/forum1/threads/43758-cercasi-progettista-teklahttp://www.cad3d.it/forum1/threads/43666-cercasi-esperto-finizioni-interne-con-catia-v5http://www.cad3d.it/forum1/threads/43454-ricerca-progettista-proeIt doesn't seem to me that "strument" is really "not important."

 

[maxopus]

That two maroni, you're getting old, almost worse than me.

 

[The_Matrix]

Okay.
I had a different impression reading some of the job offers here on cad3d:http://www.cad3d.it/forum1/threads/45408-progettista-disegnathttp://www.cad3d.it/forum1/threads/44653-progettisti-meccanici-unigraphics-torinohttp://www.cad3d.it/forum1/threads/43931-ricerco-progettista-meccanico-uso-solidworkshttp://www.cad3d.it/forum1/threads/43758-cercasi-progettista-teklahttp://www.cad3d.it/forum1/threads/43666-cercasi-esperto-finizioni-interne-con-catia-v5http://www.cad3d.it/forum1/threads/43454-ricerca-progettista-proeIt doesn't seem to me that "strument" is really "not important."

What I wanted to say is that if you are a good designer and you know any parametric 3d cad, in a couple of weeks you become master of the tool used by the company that is looking for you, enough to be productive.
after 2/3 months if you use it 8 hours a day you become very good.
after 6 months, if you have a headYou become master and commander... If you don't have a head, you'll be a good user.

vice versa, if you are a very good one on a cad instrument, equal to the same, to become a good designer, uses years, other than 2/3 weeks.

therefore, I have, if a company puts as pre-requisite knowledge of a cad, then the cases are 2:
- Who's looking for you wants a very low profile... not a designer but a junior designer
- who's looking for you has no idea what you're looking for (typical of staff research companies)

 

[gil]

“who is looking for you wants a very low profile... not a designer but a junior designer”

very common case. also because today the recruits are all aimed at managing a single contract, so they want you immediately operational.

“Who is looking for you has no idea what you are looking for (typical of staff research companies)”

equally common case, even within companies, who selection people, often understands nothing of the technical office.

 

[ROAR]

That two maroni, you're getting old, almost worse than me.

super