• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

license solid edge tips

  • Thread starter Thread starter ghostryke
  • Start date Start date
have the name and address ip from a trial version
I can only proceed if they have the signature on a contract, when you buy the software and you acettano the terms of the contract and how to sign the possibility to store your data, if you then install a pirate version..... you celebrate.
if you want advice denies everything and move on another software.
you have nothing to lose, you have no files generated with solid edge
of files I did not generate it and on the same day I downloaded the free trial of 30 days but never installed, if together I also put that we made a contract for if + assistance of three years ............... I don't think I did anything so bad. The problem is that you go to a colossus siemens........ and he who had to provide me with the program + assistance can do nothing....... I am waiting for an answer from their lawyer who follows all these causes....... I hope he understands that it was all in good faith but it seems that they say you downloaded it and installed it.... now pays.
 
you are in good faith, you have not generated files you have not created profit neither for you nor for your customers, and siemens that is not in good faith
example
You're getting married, you're not in time to say you're asking for food, what are you doing? :
1)Prayers, attention, you haven't slept yet, maybe you don't like it and then you'll have to pay the lover too
2)Pray, then every time you go to bed think about how much and bitch and what will ask you
3)Don't pay, send it to that country and make the gigolo
 
more or less like saying that I recorded you with a recorder unknowing... It's not legal evidence!
I don't know how they know or have had the ip associated with your company but I think they always hit the usual ones!
wrong. every pc on the net (company or internet) has an ip. in an intranet each pc has its own different from others. if you go on the internet with a static ip connection, all pcs take that ip, and that ip is read by all the servers you contact. if you are a private, when you go to the internet use a dynamic ip (released by your provider) that changes from time to time.
to check go on: http://whatismyipaddress.com/
 
typically companies to receive real-time mail use a public static ip. knowing that ip, you can know a lot about the company, guaranteed and online also here: http://www.mambro.it/whois/whois.php
wrong. the ip stands if static is in 99% of the provider's cases. So by questioning whois usually you find that it is a fastweb, telecom, infostrada etc. user to get back from the ip, even static, to the company you have to ask a question to the provider, which should answer only after judicial order. The only realistic explanation is that the op recorded his static ip at siemens plm with his personal data.

p.s. from this story we learned that solid edge calls home whenever we start it, and communicates the license number. So far nothing wrong, if we're in order, even if the siemens so replaces the judicial bodies I think would be the only legally bound to suppress the crimes. What if he sends more than the license number? If I made products that are competing with American companies I would start to worry. Maybe there's a reason why the airbus uses catia and not nx... ;-)
 
wrong. every pc on the net (company or internet) has an ip. in an intranet each pc has its own different from others. if you go on the internet with a static ip connection, all pcs take that ip, and that ip is read by all the servers you contact. if you are a private, when you go to the internet use a dynamic ip (released by your provider) that changes from time to time.
to check go on: http://whatismyipaddress.com/
This answer is not very pertinent with the gerod message. However, web servers that receive questions are true that they see the router's public ip and not that of the pc in the lan, but if I'm not mistaken they can still see the host name of the specific machine.
 
wrong. the ip stands if static is in 99% of the provider's cases. So by questioning whois usually you find that it is a fastweb, telecom, infostrada etc. user to get back from the ip, even static, to the company you have to ask a question to the provider, which should answer only after judicial order. The only realistic explanation is that the op recorded his static ip at siemens plm with his personal data.
to me this does not result, the public record is recorded and present in a "list" open to consultation, as well as for websites etc.
However, everything, to say that they still track even those who have never registered on the siemens site.
 
This answer is not very pertinent with the gerod message. However, web servers that receive questions are true that they see the router's public ip and not that of the pc in the lan, but if I'm not mistaken they can still see the host name of the specific machine.
Actually they can detect a lot of other additional information. But here now, he'd go away.
 
p.s. from this story we learned that solid edge calls home whenever we start it, and communicates the license number. So far nothing wrong, if we're in order, even if the siemens so replaces the judicial bodies I think would be the only legally bound to suppress the crimes. What if he sends more than the license number? If I made products that are competing with American companies I would start to worry. Maybe there's a reason why the airbus uses catia and not nx... ;-)
the real mechanism behind the siemens license control did not disclose it to me, so its actual operation is only a source of conjecture, because even if you are not discovered with the license craccata, and send a file to a user with regular license, solid edge however realizes that the file is not "good".
As far as airbus is concerned, I do not think it is a problem of licensing to have made catia choose to other sw, because boing (for example) has nx siemens.
 
to me this does not result, the public record is recorded and present in a "list" open to consultation, as well as for websites etc.
It's not like that. I tried to question the static ip of an onluss I work with through the site you provided, and what I see is the provider, and not the onluss.

the speech of the websites is different: they are registered on behalf of the owner, but they are usually hosted at server-farm for which what you see is the address of the hosting site, which almost never coincides with the company's headquarters to which the website refers.
 
the real mechanism behind the siemens license control did not disclose it to me, so its actual operation is only a source of conjecture, because even if you are not discovered with the license craccata, and send a file to a user with regular license, solid edge however realizes that the file is not "good".
However, you must agree with me that solid edge sends data from your computer to third parties, without telling you and without asking for permission. What's inside this data is all they know. Too bad he's no longer in assistance otherwise I would have raised the issue on the American forum.
 
the speech of the websites is different: they are registered on behalf of the owner, but they are usually hosted at server-farm for which what you see is the address of the hosting site, which almost never coincides with the company's headquarters to which the website refers.
you will be unfortunate, I tried with the sites of different customers and I always came back a name!
 
However, you must agree with me that solid edge sends data from your computer to third parties, without telling you and without asking for permission. What's inside this data is all they know. Too bad he's no longer in assistance otherwise I would have raised the issue on the American forum.
I can't tell you:
1) What solid edge communicates
2) when you communicate something (always or only in the presence of craccates)

I never bothered to read the license agreement that you accept at the time of installation, surely track them there should be.
of several cases of companies caught with the hands in the jam I felt different, who more than anyone less managed to mediate and have "discounts" but eventually came to a transaction.
 
you will be unfortunate, I tried with the sites of different customers and I always came back a name!
but did you question the whois database using the institutional website or the ip address of the company headquarters?
 
of several cases of companies caught with the hands in the jam I felt different, who more than anyone less managed to mediate and have "discounts" but eventually came to a transaction.
'Cause you know about those hands in the jam. but if a fiat design is hidden sent to the trusted general motors that will never tell you.
 
'Cause you know about those hands in the jam. but if a fiat design is hidden sent to the trusted general motors that will never tell you.
I know about the companies that come into maintenance with us, after being discovered.
a fiat and general motors I think it doesn't change much to buy an extra license, and then I doubt there is a user with admin rights to install pirate sw.
 
a fiat and general motors I think it doesn't change much to buy an extra license, and then I doubt there is a user with admin rights to install pirate sw.
I don't say that the fiat or gm use soft pirate, I was raising another topic:

Since if you enjoy communicating with the outside world to the company without speaking to the company that bought it, it's not that maybe it does the same thing but sending out files of projects instead of license numbers?
The fiat-gm example was to say that maybe a soft use has a backdoor that serves to send data to the government's friends, which could happen with any other soft naturally. in case we have proof that the program sends data to the asternum, unconscious of the customer.
 
I don't say that the fiat or gm use soft pirate, I was raising another topic:

Since if you enjoy communicating with the outside world to the company without speaking to the company that bought it, it's not that maybe it does the same thing but sending out files of projects instead of license numbers?
The fiat-gm example was to say that maybe a soft use has a backdoor that serves to send data to the government's friends, which could happen with any other soft naturally. in case we have proof that the program sends data to the asternum, unconscious of the customer.
without wanting to enter the merits, but here is running out on "gomblottism" and various chemical shales.
 
my use never happened, and the same day I had via email the free activation link ............... I repeat:unbearing, but in good faith for a mixed curiosity and want to try now I can not have the free change with only the three-year assistance......... despite the lawyer siemens understood the good faith of the thing, now I have to pay the program.... say that from the total 48,000 I hope to arrive at about 8,000 of the basic............ But it bothers me the way.
wrong is human, persevering evil....... not having had patience as in my case instead becomes honorable.
far from me wanting to promote piracy, but the behavior of siemens seems really incorrect so I would like to report, for those who use windows, that there is the possibility to set the firewall so that it prevents one or more programs to be able to access the internet.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top