gfrank
Guest
Did someone get the sw?
What do you think after trying it?
What do you think after trying it?
Anchorage
Guest
I associate myself with the questions asked by gfrank
p.s. : I am always confident that h, soon or late, will publish
an explanatory and detailed video of the product!
the link I keep under control is this
http://www.youtube.com/user/accasoftwarespa/videos
p.s. : I am always confident that h, soon or late, will publish
an explanatory and detailed video of the product!
the link I keep under control is this
http://www.youtube.com/user/accasoftwarespa/videos
bagiolino
Guest
good morning to all, for those interested in buildingsus inform that the cost of the sw is 1800 euros! !
gfrank
Guest
Did you get to try it?
bagiolino
Guest
Unfortunately not but they told me that soon should go out the trial version of a month!
newcomsas
Guest
Good morning, everyone.
I was impressed by the presentation of the building. that you know there is some perspective that comes out the trial version in a short time ? the 'in a little' to which he mentioned bagiolino has lasted for months.
on paper however it seems an ideal sw, at least if integrated to the other packages acca (edilus, primus and termus). are there similar offers from other firms covering all phases of the design following in all and throughout our legislation?
thanks in advance,
newcomsas
gfrank
Guest
there is also a presentation on the site.
a first annotation on the sw: it does not seem to include the management of the demolished/built (yellows/reds). If what it was, it's a big sin compared to the other sw 3d
other popular sw, complete with plug-ins developed by third parties ...
a first annotation on the sw: it does not seem to include the management of the demolished/built (yellows/reds). If what it was, it's a big sin compared to the other sw 3d
other popular sw, complete with plug-ins developed by third parties ...
sentenza
Guest
Bye to all,
I would like to bring to vs attention this article: http://www.geometri.cc/articolo/21756 (I hope I do not contravene the rules of the forum) and then take advantage to collect new testimonies of use of this sw.
in the office where work is being evaluated the entry to the bim world, mainly because of the recurrence of metric/sal project with regional/provincial precepts. we are therefore considering revit lt and buildingsus (I would also evaluate allplan but we come from a non-positive experience with the 2005 version and "who pays" does not want to know anymore). di edificius leaves me a little puzzled the fact that online I found practically nothing.. No one talks about it. revit seems to me consolidated and with a very active community.
thanks to all
♪
I would like to bring to vs attention this article: http://www.geometri.cc/articolo/21756 (I hope I do not contravene the rules of the forum) and then take advantage to collect new testimonies of use of this sw.
in the office where work is being evaluated the entry to the bim world, mainly because of the recurrence of metric/sal project with regional/provincial precepts. we are therefore considering revit lt and buildingsus (I would also evaluate allplan but we come from a non-positive experience with the 2005 version and "who pays" does not want to know anymore). di edificius leaves me a little puzzled the fact that online I found practically nothing.. No one talks about it. revit seems to me consolidated and with a very active community.
thanks to all
♪
Tristan
Guest
after some releases in pump magna seems to be finished all in order. In my opinion there is no trip for cats on the market. If you pass me the term, in my opinion, this time it peed out of the pot. I think it can only make sense if the customer has a wide range of products. continue to follow with interest the discussion
Geometra72
Guest
Hello everyone,
I bought buildingsus almost a year ago, after having seen the presentation at made a milan; since then acca has released 6 new releases (updates) but the program takes behind bugs (walls that disappear, that continue beyond the due ... only to say some!) and continues to have sins that make it almost unusable, so much so that I practically had to dispose of it and I returned to the dear old chain... it is certainly putting us good will in trying to improve it, but I think they have entered a field outside their reach.
I bought buildingsus almost a year ago, after having seen the presentation at made a milan; since then acca has released 6 new releases (updates) but the program takes behind bugs (walls that disappear, that continue beyond the due ... only to say some!) and continues to have sins that make it almost unusable, so much so that I practically had to dispose of it and I returned to the dear old chain... it is certainly putting us good will in trying to improve it, but I think they have entered a field outside their reach.
XCAD
Guest
interesting revit lt, but I also care to know what you mean by "non-positive experience with allplan 2005" also because I had the opportunity to see the recent versions of allplan, very beautiful but very Moroccan and in my opinion unproductive for ordinary works.
gfrank
Guest
I don't want to be an office defender, but it's the problems of a young sw. revit usage from version 4.5: If I don't remember badly, up to 7 at least 3/4 updates per year, averagely one every 2/3 months.
and also there, the walls "scapped" and did not join with the roofs; drawing families with primitives different from line and/or arch was almost impossible, etc. etc. etc.
when using a "improper" command, the sw crashed (often damaged the file, no longer recoverable)
the first "stable" version was 8.0/8.1
are the usual problems of youth ...
Geometra72
Guest
on the fact that a young sw can have tares that by the way the house solves I agree with you. However, revit, allplan, archicad, the bim basically invented it while the developers were able to start from the experience of competing sw avoiding the same errors committed by them. who buys buildingsus then, is obliged to subscribe to the assistance contract "amicus" (other than 360 euros per year) that in reality, more than serve the user of the program to have straight on how to use it (although it should be underlined the professionalism and quality in general of the assistance of acca), serves to be, that widens its number of testers to all users of the sw. however I invite you to download the trial version! I would be very interested to hear the opinions of other users, perhaps of those who already use revit or allplan. Moreover I have never seen any course or seminar of a faculty of engineering or architecture where the use of buildingsus was proposed, as for other it happens instead for revit etc. ... something will mean that too. Hi.
gfrank
Guest
my sw review (made with "dog skin" model) you can read here:http://www.cad3d.it/forum1/showthre...nuova-versione&p=322189&viewfull=1#post322189.
Unfortunately, I couldn't test it thoroughly.
I must add that with revit I did as you: purchase with enthusiasm, after 2/3 months dismissed (referred the use of autocad), after another 6 months I was impunced: I tried to enter the "bloody philosophy" and within two months I became operational (a decent use) from there on I left autocad in the drawer (it is done to say :wink
I add that, up to version 6.xx every week I sent to the adesk "at least 1/2 file "of the sudden closing error" (the authorization message appeared to send the file to adesk (which I punctually sent)
do not discourage you: I think I'm one of the next users of buildingsus (a couple of years), at the end of the revit subs in 2015.
precise that I paid the subs since 2002, if not mistaken: Do you count on how much I spent...
Unfortunately, I couldn't test it thoroughly.
I must add that with revit I did as you: purchase with enthusiasm, after 2/3 months dismissed (referred the use of autocad), after another 6 months I was impunced: I tried to enter the "bloody philosophy" and within two months I became operational (a decent use) from there on I left autocad in the drawer (it is done to say :wink
I add that, up to version 6.xx every week I sent to the adesk "at least 1/2 file "of the sudden closing error" (the authorization message appeared to send the file to adesk (which I punctually sent)
do not discourage you: I think I'm one of the next users of buildingsus (a couple of years), at the end of the revit subs in 2015.
precise that I paid the subs since 2002, if not mistaken: Do you count on how much I spent...
Last edited:
gfrank
Guest
then, it was not called bim: it was called "parametric cad" (the bim was beyond to come); however I had tried archicad (2.0 if not mistaken), but it was too Moroccan; allplan was complex in the creation of families (it was necessary to know the programming language ....).
I wanted to go to adt, but then they showed me revit (a lightning strike). version 4.5 is of 2002 (it was the 12 release)
at the time revit, was the only sw (I believe) that implemented the real-time update of the views (not needed refresh) and allowed to draw from any view
even today, the bim, is still a "not very clear" thing for all; yourself, confuse the bim with the software...
Last edited: