problems with gas fillet

[cacciatorino]

I have to put a piece on the table with a gas fillet, and I find two problems:

1) the thread should be rc type (conical) but in the drop-down menu of the creation wizard I find only g (cylindrical).

2) when I put the hole in the table, it puts the value in mm with the prefix m, as it was a normal metric thread. By hand editing I obviously lose the model-table association, how can I get out the value g 1/8 or even better rc 1/8?

 

[sampom]

I have to put a piece on the table with a gas fillet, and I find two problems:

1) the thread should be rc type (conical) but in the drop-down menu of the creation wizard I find only g (cylindrical).

2) when I put the hole in the table, it puts the value in mm with the prefix m, as it was a normal metric thread. By hand editing I obviously lose the model-table association, how can I get out the value g 1/8 or even better rc 1/8?

You're operating in the iso standard, aren't you?
to note the correct designation g you have to switch to standard din.

who knows why with 2010 they added the threaded hole bspp at all standards in the creation wizard holes (first there was only in din and was called hole for pipe bspp). perhaps thinking of speeding up, not having to "salt" continuously from one table to another.. but it is a little (at nothing, I always do as before) since the annotation at the table is wrong because it takes the name of the iso mcorresponding ethric (and unreal).

As far as the conical rc is concerned, I think it is unresolvable automatically (it is not covered in the table).

greetings
Marco:smile:

 

[cacciatorino]

You're operating in the iso standard, aren't you?
to note the correct designation g you have to switch to standard din.

I'm trying with the din.

who knows why with 2010 they added the threaded hole bspp at all standards in the creation wizard holes (first there was only in din and was called hole for pipe bspp). perhaps thinking of speeding up, not having to "salt" continuously from one table to another.. but it is a little (at nothing, I always do as before) since the annotation at the table is wrong because it takes the name of the iso mcorresponding ethric (and unreal).

but then what is it to use the din standard if it does not reflect on the table?

However I have seen that if quoti using the "callout" (orrore) writing g1/8 vien out. when they realize that outside the use there is the rest of the world that does not use callout will always be too late (this us-centrism also applies to solid edge...).

As far as the conical rc is concerned, I think it is unresolvable automatically (it is not covered in the table).

Is there no way to edit this table? with other cad add custom threads is trivial, how do you do here with swx? do I have to edit the mdb file?

 

[Utente NX]

rc threads are bspts, that is conical.
you have to use the conical thread and you will see that it comes out rc.
I noticed a syntax error.. .Being English software, who translated reversed the syntax and therefore comes you out 1/8 rc-.
But if you use it in English, maybe it's okay.

 

[sampom]

I'm trying with the din.
but then what is it to use the din standard if it does not reflect on the table?

no, working in din works everything (.. mean the bspp from inside the iso).
I don't know. I don't need anything. at least for our standards. but seen in "their" optics will be for that you say:

However I have seen that if quoti using the "callout" (orrore) writing g1/8 vien out. when they realize that outside the use there is the rest of the world that does not use callout will always be too late (this us-centrism also applies to solid edge...).

the "callout" could also be well known in an assonometric view or in the model, but in the classic orthogonal projections I just don't digest it, I don't like it.. as it can be considered "formally" correct.

above all try to quote the foreskin; you will notice that there is difference in diameter using the 2 methods. And yet it is the same (does it?) gas fillet. :smile: (I know, but I should go edit the option of creation wizard).

Is there no way to edit this table? with other cad add custom threads is trivial, how do you do here with swx? do I have to edit the mdb file?

Yes, it should be possible.. I am "just" a couple of years (abundant) I use swx and I have never entered.
but if you remember (you had also participated) there is a discussion of last spring where we were talking about this, about other "errors". .
Here she is.http://www.cad3d.it/forum1/showthread.php?t=20248I repeat, I never tried.. I will have to remedy this ignorance:biggrin:

greetings
Marco:smile:

 

[sampom]

rc threads are bspts, that is conical.
you have to use the conical thread and you will see that it comes out rc.
I noticed a syntax error.. .Being English software, who translated reversed the syntax and therefore comes you out 1/8 rc-.
But if you use it in English, maybe it's okay.

the bspt type is not in swx (at least, I do not find it).
as there is no "conic fingering"..(or is not normally accessible from the interface).

greetings
Marco:smile:

 

[cacciatorino]

no, working in din works everything (.. mean the bspp from inside the iso).

You're right. You're right. I misunderstood how to apply the command. for conical threads does nothing, the cilidnrica thread, so much the conical thread should already have the greaser! :biggrin:

 

[sampom]

The conical fillet should already have the fattener! :biggrin:

Yes, usually "the particular male" are always conical.

greetings
Mar

 

[Utente NX]

the bspt type is not in swx (at least, I do not find it).
as there is no "conic fingering"..(or is not normally accessible from the interface).

greetings
Marco:smile:

you have to use conical thread... it's in the interface.
Look good.

 

[sampom]

you have to use conical thread... it's in the interface.
Look good.

Wow! !
You know I'm blind? :biggrin:

It's true, there's the beautiful icon right under the eyes in type of hole... beautiful figure I did:redface::frown: (never used sincerely).

but in the table you can put only the caption, however with the correct rc..

greetings and thanks for the alarm:smile:
Mar