quotation of fittings

[Scultore57]

Good morning to all, I would like to ask you an information on the quotation of fittings. the detail of which I sketched the sketch presents many fittings, for ease those not listed were indicated in the inscription pane between the unquoted fittings. As for others (indicated in red in the attached image) could it be right to quote them only once since the component is symmetric? My doubt lies in the fact that even if it is symmetric, the fittings are interrupted by the 4 ribs.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

attach images with the appropriate forum key, not everyone can access external sites. Moreover a file on an external site once deleted will no longer be accessible and in that case the discussion will no longer be useful for other users.

 

[Scultore57]

attach images with the appropriate forum key, not everyone can access external sites. also a file on an external site once deleted will no longer be accessible and in that case the discussion will no longer be useful for other users

Good morning, I changed the message by attaching the photo

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

Good morning to all, I would like to ask you an information on the quotation of fittings. the detail of which I sketched the sketch presents many fittings, for ease those not listed were indicated in the inscription pane between the unquoted fittings. As for others (indicated in red in the attached image) could it be right to quote them only once since the component is symmetric? My doubt lies in the fact that even if it is symmetric, the fittings are interrupted by the 4 ribs.

symmetric in what sense? vertically on one side you have a whole view on the other one section, then horizontally being there an axis turns out to be a particular cylindrical so it cannot be speculating
in any case bevelous and ray are among the last quotas to put

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

but does it make sense to make different rays for 1mm?

 

[Scultore57]

symmetric in what sense? on one side you have a whole view on the other one section, while there is an axis it is a particular cylindrical

Yes, I certainly felt bad. It is a particular cylindrical. for symmetrical I was referring to ribs

 

[Scultore57]

but does it make sense to make different rays for 1mm?

I should like to thank the rapporteur for his work.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

I should like to thank the rapporteur for his work.

I had incorrectly read r5 instead of r15

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

Yes, I certainly felt bad. It is a particular cylindrical. for symmetrical I was referring to ribs

Whereas a particular of the genus is obtained from fusion which follows a processing of turning/freshing and not from complete turning, in that view all the rays refer to axial elements, even if interrupted by ribs. another speech could take on a side view where you see the 4(?) ribs.

 

[Scultore57]

Whereas a particular of the genus is obtained from fusion which follows a processing of turning/freshing and not from complete turning, in that view all the rays refer to axial elements, even if interrupted by ribs. another speech could take on a side view where you see the 4(?) ribs.

Yes, the ribs are 4, visible in lateral view. thanks for the explanation la

 

[Marco F inox]

in this design I see two separate figures, one in sight and the other in section, however not fully indicated.
How do you say it's a symmetrical piece when the two figures are separated?
it is necessary to be clear in the display of the drawing, not to create doubts.
if the piece was unique but symmetrical, you should not repeat the ray quotas, but indicate them all where they are more understandable.