resources

[steroads]

Bye, guys. I would like to give you an opinion on a work that with passion: alcohol: I've been driving for months, opened a channel on the tube (http://www.youtube.com/user/steroads ) where every week (or less) audience of tutorials on solidworks 2010. I would like you to take a look and tell me if you find the tutorials useful. :

Thank you all! :finger:

 

[cacciatorino]

Bye, guys. I would like to give you an opinion on a work that with passion: alcohol: I've been driving for months, opened a channel on the tube (http://www.youtube.com/user/steroads ) where every week (or less) audience of tutorials on solidworks 2010. I would like you to take a look and tell me if you find the tutorials useful. :

Thank you all! :finger:

I looked at the drill bit tutorial for a minute, and I just wanted to tell you to correct it because the cut you make at the end with the conical patch is conceptually wrong. As you did the drill bit, it's got a negative strip angle for which heel.

Actually, the axis of the trimming cone does not intercept the rotation axis of the tip, but it's a bit shifted on the side to create the angle of positive strip as it serves.

Then I have some doubts about how you did the helical excavation: as is the "uterine" sketch lies on a perpendicular plane to the longitudinal axis, while instead it should be on an angled plane of a corner open to the corner of the propeller.

Bye.

 

[steroads]

I looked at the drill bit tutorial for a minute, and I just wanted to tell you to correct it because the cut you make at the end with the conical patch is conceptually wrong. As you did the drill bit, it's got a negative strip angle for which heel.

Actually, the axis of the trimming cone does not intercept the rotation axis of the tip, but it's a bit shifted on the side to create the angle of positive strip as it serves.

Then I have some doubts about how you did the helical excavation: as is the "uterine" sketch lies on a perpendicular plane to the longitudinal axis, while instead it should be on an angled plane of a corner open to the corner of the propeller.

Bye.

Wow!
Let's say that in principle, the tutorials that audience are intended to allow those who use them to take confidence with the functions of the program rather than make real projects. I know that the tip is not engineeringly valid (as well as gears and other things).
I knew that the axis of the cone was not to be centered but I did not know how much to decentralize it, so I got one of those tips that once ruined are sharpened to the pier as I usually do. then there is also an additional profile along the propeller that is located in modern tips but in normal iron tips I usually do not see it (perhaps because I have too old tips :biggrin: )

 

[SolidUser]

Bye, guys. I would like to give you an opinion on a work that with passion: alcohol: I've been driving for months, opened a channel on the tube (http://www.youtube.com/user/steroads ) where every week (or less) audience of tutorials on solidworks 2010. I would like you to take a look and tell me if you find the tutorials useful. :

Thank you all! :finger:

I am not satisfied.
I looked at the first tutorial of the list where you represent the grater and models with a parametric without inserting paramaters in the sketch.
If your tutorials should serve those who are fasting by solidworks, do not transfer the essence of the parametric and then the basics.

 

[steroads]

I am not satisfied.
I looked at the first tutorial of the list where you represent the grater and models with a parametric without inserting paramaters in the sketch.
If your tutorials should serve those who are fasting by solidworks, do not transfer the essence of the parametric and then the basics.

Excuse me but what do you mean to insert parameters in the sketch???
relationships of equality, parallelism, hills and so on? ?
If so I apply them when necessary, I usually prefer them to quotas.

 

[cacciatorino]

Excuse me but what do you mean to insert parameters in the sketch???
relationships of equality, parallelism, hills and so on? ?
If so I apply them when necessary, I usually prefer them to quotas.

probably soliduser refers to the fact that sketches must always be completely bound and not left labile, otherwise they will easily fail in regeneration.

 

[Mike1967]

Excuse me but what do you mean to insert parameters in the sketch???
relationships of equality, parallelism, hills and so on? ?
If so I apply them when necessary, I usually prefer them to quotas.

-nero- mandatory sketch... If you know sldwks you'll know what I'm talking about... :smile:

 

[steroads]

strange I never had problems with the sketches not totally defined... cmq I will take into consideration the thing in the next tutorials... :wink:

 

[Mike1967]

Strange I never had problems with the sketches not totally defined... cmq I will consider the thing in the next tutorials... :wink:

you will not have had it because you will probably not have made changes
"heavy" to notice.... trust me.

 

[steroads]

In fact no, I draw all of a breath. By the way, I was asked privately how to interface solidworks to maxwell, I explain here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qof__s3w58g

 

[Dade73]

you will not have had it because you will probably not have made changes
"heavy" to notice.... trust me.

Hello, mike, I'm confiscating my sins: as most of the times I do not carry to total definition the sketch, when you talk about "heavy" changes to what you refer to,.
Hello and thank you

 

[cacciatorino]

strange I never had problems with the unfinished sketches. . .

Open the attached file, and change the length of the first extrusion from 80 to 40 mm. :tongue:

Bye.

 

[Oldwarper]

Excuse me but what do you mean to insert parameters in the sketch???
relationships of equality, parallelism, hills and so on? ?
If so I apply them when necessary, I usually prefer them to quotas.

Since it is tutorials, better, at least in those cases, do everything "as God commands," leaving users the "freedom" only when enough familiarity has been achieved.

 

[Mike1967]

Hello, mike, I'm confiscating my sins: as most of the times I do not carry to total definition the sketch, when you talk about "heavy" changes to what you refer to,.
Hello and thank you

...to burn... :smile:
http://www.cad3d.it/forum1/showpost.php?p=208391&postcount=12

 

[steroads]

Open the attached file, and change the length of the first extrusion from 80 to 40 mm. :tongue:

Bye.

you are aware of this kind of problem! there is a consideration to be made though: as on youtube (e.g. prampolini) there are already tutorials explaining the peculiarities of the parameters of solidworks, I have never bothered to take care of it, all here I do not want to copy the neighbors! :biggrin:
sometimes I draw inspiration from the tutorials in Russian...