solid edge as overlay 2 pieces to see its differences

[Cassio4]

good evening to all, I have a problem with solid edge st2, I can not overlay two similar pieces to see the differences.When I check the two pieces inserted and superimposed perfectly in the together by the command controls the interference, solid edge creates a part that should be the interference.in reality the part created as interference is nothing but the second piece selected for comparison.some knows a way to overlay two pieces and see two pieces.
thanks in advance to those who can help me.

 

[Leso]

test with these settings

 

[Cassio4]

test with these settings

I'm sorry, but how do I compare a piece with myself? Thank you.

 

[radio]

I'm sorry, but how do I compare a piece with myself? Thank you.

you can do if your verification set is the son of another at the higher level, in this case, with the leso settings you just have to select the subaxieme and proceed to the analysis of the interference.
It's a very convenient method when you want to check in one shot only the interferences of a whole axieme.

Bye.

 

[Be_on_edge]

good evening to all, I have a problem with solid edge st2, I can not overlay two similar pieces to see the differences.When I check the two pieces inserted and superimposed perfectly in the together by the command controls the interference, solid edge creates a part that should be the interference.in reality the part created as interference is nothing but the second piece selected for comparison.some knows a way to overlay two pieces and see two pieces.
thanks in advance to those who can help me.

It's normal, because the interferences are the common areas of 2 pieces, and if you overlap 2 almost equal the result will be the whole piece without the differences.

to see the differences between two pieces follow this procedure:

1. create new part.
2. copy part of the first piece as solid.
3. copy part of the second piece as solid construction.
4. Boolean of subtraction using the second piece as reference.

save the part and reopen it when you want to control the differences, it will update automatically.

Hi.

 

[Leso]

Sorry I made the suggestion in a hurry, I understood something for another...the boolean is the best solution.

 

[Cassio4]

It's normal, because the interferences are the common areas of 2 pieces, and if you overlap 2 almost equal the result will be the whole piece without the differences.

to see the differences between two pieces follow this procedure:

1. create new part.
2. copy part of the first piece as solid.
3. copy part of the second piece as solid construction.
4. Boolean of subtraction using the second piece as reference.

save the part and reopen it when you want to control the differences, it will update automatically.

Hi.

Hello, I tried this procedure but it does not boolean me and gives me the Boolean operation message on the failed solid. Thanks anyway.

 

[Cassio4]

you can do if your verification set is the son of another at the higher level, in this case, with the leso settings you just have to select the subaxieme and proceed to the analysis of the interference.
It's a very convenient method when you want to check in one shot only the interferences of a whole axieme.

Bye.

hi radio, I tried to compare the two pieces in this way but it doesn't give me interference, what among other things impossible.Can you explain better how to set the two assemblies? I have to compare two pieces very similar but not the same.thanks a thousand.

 

[radio]

hi radio, I tried to compare the two pieces in this way but it doesn't give me interference, what among other things impossible.Can you explain better how to set the two assemblies? I have to compare two pieces very similar but not the same.thanks a thousand.

you have to create a set (axieme1) containing the two pieces to compare appropriately positioned, create a superior assembly (axieme2) that has as its son1; launch the command "control interference" and selections da pathfinder "assieme1"-->elabora (at least selected options: "compared to itself", "interfering changes", "engage interfering parts".
the result of the analysis is the interfering volume (evidenced or in part form), for the differences you have to do as it says be_on_edge.

Bye.

 

[Cassio4]

nothing to do with boolean, if they place a piece compared to the other perfectly aligned solid edge tells me that he can't do boolean, if I move a piece es: 1mm does boolean regularly.someone knows how ever solid edge has problems?

 

[Cassio4]

Can no one help me?

 

[Davimont]

Are you sure a body comes from subtraction? I can't do the test, but maybe having no body as a result, Boolean subtraction fails.

 

[Cassio4]

Are you sure a body comes from subtraction? I can't do the test, but maybe having no body as a result, Boolean subtraction fails.

hi davimont, from the subtraction must be a body, but there is something that does not go azz.....when I have already happened with the booleans that some edge of the piece broke the boxes but on this I can not understand where the problem is.thanks

 

[radio]

hi davimont, from the subtraction must be a body, but there is something that does not go azz.....when I have already happened with the booleans that some edge of the piece broke the boxes but on this I can not understand where the problem is.thanks

should you post the two pieces to compare (in neutral format preferably), so that we can try to identify the problem (maybe a "non manifold" error), otherwise besides the indications that have been given to you until now I don't know what else to invent.

Bye.

 

[Cassio4]

should you post the two pieces to compare (in neutral format preferably), so that we can try to identify the problem (maybe a "non manifold" error), otherwise besides the indications that have been given to you until now I don't know what else to invent.

Bye.

hi radio, the error is not of the type non manifold, in order to succeed to make the boolean between the two pieces I have to overlap them and move them then of at least 0,5mm on the masses z.in this way I do the boolean if instead I perfectly overlap the two pieces tells me that it is not possible to create the boolean. Too far I can not post the two pieces inquanto I can not disseminate designs of customers.