• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

that 3d choose?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rickcick
  • Start date Start date
According to me to lower prices it would be necessary to break the connection (just sometimes) between cad and plm. often we little ones pay the development of a product that has tangible potential only in a medium-sized business area.
 
and if they use a double kernel as ironcad at least in a transition release?
found on the American forum:
our next generation software, which will be released in the next few years, will include a different modeling engine than the one we use today. this software will be offered in addition to the software we currently sell. no customers will be forced to move from the current version to this next-gen version.



the current version of solidworks, which we will continue to develop and support in parallel to the next-gen system, will continue to be based on the parasolid kernel. there is no "change" coming for the tools our customers use today.



matt / solidworks
 
These are the speeches that already made 10 years ago the commercials of a cad with the orange brand, of which we were unsatisfactory customers for about 8 months:biggrin:


chariot
Now I'm curious, I don't remember any orange brand, except for a flame :smile:
 
According to me to lower prices it would be necessary to break the connection (just sometimes) between cad and plm. often we little ones pay the development of a product that has tangible potential only in a medium-sized business area.
100% quote
It is not easy to justify the owner of a small investment firm of this type, without counting the time necessary to be sufficiently operational :frown:
once you rate the price... What's next for you to lift him up?
you don't need to drop the price....it makes a good promotion for a few weeks/month, already do so many :wink:
 
these are the speeches that already made 10 years ago the commercials of a cad with the orange brand, of which we were unsatisfactory customers for about 8 months


chariot
The ones with the cloud? we talked to the same people then, even the times they correspond! :biggrin:
 
These are the speeches that already made 10 years ago the commercials of a cad with the orange brand, of which we were unsatisfactory customers for about 8 months:biggrin:


chariot
We also did these speeches, but we have distrusted and we have done well!
 
We also did these speeches, but we have distrusted and we have done well!
we, however, at those times, had two big customers who had gbg and were treating the passage to ".....", we only agreed:frown:

in any case I remain of the idea that "...." had excellent potential, but it was too acerbic and unstable :angry:
 
in any case I remain of the idea that "...." had excellent potential, but it was too acerbic and unstable :angry:
You had my own impression. . .
where I worked at that time, we took it on "hot tip" of the direction as it cost little and had a kind of integrated pdm that would be really helpful.
but they kept it for a while... It was a torment to work on us.
 
yesterday I got the offer of autodesk products from our trusted supplier :tongue:

just to have a chat, here are the proposals with some reflection:

1) suite inventor (which includes autocad mechanical, and other programs that I don't care for now), all-in-one price and a maintenance contract aligned with the various solids.... I read around.

2) autocad mechanical suites (with more than the usual programs that I do not know/interest, at least for the moment ), predicted as the inventor suite:confused: but with maintenance contract practically halved.

3) autocad + third-party application for mechanics that counts to the hand costs 500€ more than the suite with inventor :eek: .... of maintenance there is no trace

I forgot. ... training course at a crazy price, is a good 40% more than the pre-offs of the various solids....:angry:

I didn't write the prices because I don't know if you can, possibly if you discuss it in private.

chariot
 
I didn't write the prices because I don't know if you can, possibly if you discuss it in private.
if the prices are those of the "official" list you can also report them. if instead they are special conditions with personalized discounts for you maybe it is better not to be "reato", more than anything for correctness.

greetings
Mar
 
yesterday I got the offer of autodesk products from our trusted supplier

just to have a chat, here are the proposals with some reflection:

1) suite inventor (which includes autocad mechanical, and other programs that I don't care for now), all-in-one price and a maintenance contract aligned with the various solids.... I read around.

2) autocad mechanical suites (with more than the usual programs that I do not know/interest, at least for the moment ), predicted as the inventor suite:confused: but with maintenance contract practically halved.

3) autocad + third-party application for mechanics that counts to the hand costs 500€ more than the suite with inventor .... of maintenance there is no trace

I forgot. ... training course at a crazy price, is a good 40% more than the pre-offs of the various solids... .

I didn't write the prices because I don't know if you can, possibly if you discuss it in private.

chariot
In my opinion, it's more right that you write them the prices, so that you can also help other users to get an idea...
should be all in the light of the sun I do not understand where the problem is:finger:
do not tell me that the application from third parties is called technometal otherwise I fire you in trunk :biggrin:
 
In my opinion, it's more right that you write them the prices, so that you can also help other users to get an idea...
I don't think so, because the seller would then be unfavorable to the competition he already knows his economic offer and we can rely on more competitive offers.
 
In my opinion, it's more right that you write them the prices, so that you can also help other users to get an idea...
should be all in the light of the sun I do not understand where the problem is:finger:
do not tell me that the application from third parties is called technometal otherwise I fire you in trunk :biggrin:
the price to list you can always say, while the price with the discount applied precisely is not correct, that is a trade negotiation between you is the dealer, the problem is very simple as you have already answered hunter, moreover it always depends on how much you buy and if you are a new customer and what kind of partnership you come to create.
too many variables and too different from customer to customer.
greetings
I don't think so, because the seller would then be unfavorable to the competition he already knows his economic offer and we can rely on more competitive offers.
That's right. .
 
yesterday I got the offer of autodesk products from our trusted supplier :tongue:

just to have a chat, here are the proposals with some reflection:

1) suite inventor (which includes autocad mechanical, and other programs that I don't care for now), all-in-one price and a maintenance contract aligned with the various solids.... I read around.

2) autocad mechanical suites (with more than the usual programs that I do not know/interest, at least for the moment ), predicted as the inventor suite:confused: but with maintenance contract practically halved.

3) autocad + third-party application for mechanics that counts to the hand costs 500€ more than the suite with inventor :eek: .... of maintenance there is no trace

I forgot. ... training course at a crazy price, is a good 40% more than the pre-offs of the various solids....:angry:

I didn't write the prices because I don't know if you can, possibly if you discuss it in private.

chariot
Your comments are correct and I also do not understand how autodesk can still sell autocad mechanical at those prices. It is good to push people towards 3d, but it is a price absolutely not congruent to the technology offered.
regarding the application of third parties it is necessary to reason for a moment. I, for example, have 2 top licenses of qs and it is convenient if you need mechanical features with a lt. at that point the price can go. if instead you combine it with autocad full.... Better let it go. the total price is too high.

I point out that inventor is also sold without suites and I think the price is around 4500 a list. in this case autocad is excluded.
 
Your comments are correct and I also do not understand how autodesk can still sell autocad mechanical at those prices. It is good to push people towards 3d, but it is a price absolutely not congruent to the technology offered.
regarding the application of third parties it is necessary to reason for a moment. I, for example, have 2 top licenses of qs and it is convenient if you need mechanical features with a lt. at that point the price can go. if instead you combine it with autocad full.... Better let it go. the total price is too high.

I point out that inventor is also sold without suites and I think the price is around 4500 a list. in this case autocad is excluded.
because they can sell it to me is simple, they have a scary install!

you want to put, one morning comes a technician (but also not) who in 20 minutes installs the "new" autocad :biggrin: and after a few hours/minute you are already printing the first drawing, the holder is happy and willingly signs the check..... you have present the advertising: You like to win easy.

you want to pass to another cad.....adrive the technician, install the best cad3d of the universe and after a few hours what you managed to do... Perhaps some nice cubes with a hole, and maybe even some bevels:biggrin: , the owner obviously will be pissed off, and will vomit bile while paying and the phone rings continuously with even more angry customers because the works do not proceed:angry:

Now that I think about it, but who makes me do it to put me in the midst of :tongue:
chariot
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top