Besadogo
Guest
I would like to ask you to take away the doubt that I am dealing with my colleague. 3/8" g or 3/8" bsp are equal or are different threads?
thanking everyone for greetings.
♪
thanking everyone for greetings.
♪
Er Presidente
Guest
the "g" (gas) is a subfamily of bsp that is completed with the "r" (rhor).
But now everything has changed (that boring!) and we have bspp and bspt, parallel and conical.
to remind you of the difference, remember that "p" stands for "parallel" and "t" for "taper".
read here:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/british_standard_pipe_thread
Besadogo
Guest
hi er president,
Thank you for the quick answer. but if so I have a male 3/8" g can I screw it to a female 3/8" bsp?
Thank you for the quick answer. but if so I have a male 3/8" g can I screw it to a female 3/8" bsp?
paolino
Guest
Of course! Just a key with a lever long enough! :biggrin:
meccanicamg
Guest
as much as I found the two threads are almost identical, so compatible. Remember that often in pipes and fittings threads are conical g 3/8 (rings and jets in afl cast iron, wells, falk ...).
for bsp profile see qui so conical.
for gas profile see qui
comparing the angle values of the threaded bread, the greater diameter, the smaller diameter and the step have identical values for gas and bsp, so the two threads are compatible.if both conical or both cylindrical there is no problem and just put a seal ring (or rather than flat seal) axial. if one of the two was conical, the seal must be guaranteed with a teflon wrapped on the thread.
Besadogo
Guest
Thank you 1000!! !
Good evening
Good evening
Er Presidente
Guest
what we call g (gas) would be conical, so the original bspt (taper) originally indicated with r.
the "our" g, gas, is confused with the original g of the bspp (parallel), which instead was parallel, hence the endless "lotte".
Hi.
MBT
Guest
Um...
I don't want to seem a challenger, but once the gc threads were indicated, which meant conical gas (bstp)...
so those g just should have been cylindrical gas (bspp)...
or am I committing the crime of wickedness?
I don't want to seem a challenger, but once the gc threads were indicated, which meant conical gas (bstp)...
so those g just should have been cylindrical gas (bspp)...
or am I committing the crime of wickedness?
zeffiro62
Guest
We abolish the imperial system
Er Presidente
Guest
Why do you think that would be harm?We abolish the imperial system
:smile:
meccanicamg
Guest
Fortunately we have the internet to solve any doubts about the threading indications and anything else. whether or not there are the imperial units little counts, bad that go converts.
Luciano Z
Guest
someone can tell me how to calculate the øe of the various gas fillets es:1'= 33.249, why 2'=59.614?
meccanicamg
Guest
try to search if you find on the internet the din card and there should be profile building formulas as for the uni-iso
ulde52
Guest
Sorry I am new to the forum I would need to understand the measure of the threads step i.e. if there is a difference and what in terms
Numbers between 3/8 gas npt and g thread
Thank you.
Numbers between 3/8 gas npt and g thread
Thank you.
meccanicamg
Guest
but how many beautiful tables there are on the net to look what is written for npt.
If they were the same, there would be no two Englishmen. just look at the thread bread and see that gas 55 degrees and npt 60 degrees...http://www.marcellocucchi.altervista.org/filettature.pdf
If they were the same, there would be no two Englishmen. just look at the thread bread and see that gas 55 degrees and npt 60 degrees...http://www.marcellocucchi.altervista.org/filettature.pdf
Zak3
Guest
Good morning.
I connect to this old post.
I should turn female rc fillets into rp (paralleles). 1/8, 1/4, 3/8
I wanted to ask you if someone has experience, from the tables I understand that in lina of maximum pasta repass the male parallel on the conical fillets. the step is the same I would go only to remove the tape from 1/16.
Does anyone have experience?
Thank you.
I connect to this old post.
I should turn female rc fillets into rp (paralleles). 1/8, 1/4, 3/8
I wanted to ask you if someone has experience, from the tables I understand that in lina of maximum pasta repass the male parallel on the conical fillets. the step is the same I would go only to remove the tape from 1/16.
Does anyone have experience?
Thank you.
meccanicamg
Guest
Take one first and try it. also with the tables to the hand compares the data of the various diameters. you will understand by looking at the table if the diameter of the transformation is compatible or not.
by experience I tell you that you can review, but check the tables.
by experience I tell you that you can review, but check the tables.
Zak3
Guest
Thank you, and I'm sorry for the late answer... In the end, I tried and could... Thanks again