vectorizing a paper design

[Fulvio Romano]

If you explain why we'd be grateful.

You're off the road. I said the thread is surreal, not the subject treated.
starts with an op, engineer, who asks a lawful question, but does so with the language from which it clearly transposes that it is not of the profession. use "export" instead of importing, does not know the term "vettorialization" or "scannerization", etc. is not a criticism eh, is only a statement.

follows with a "it is absurd even only as thought", a technically unsuitable phrase to reality (otherwise vectorizers would not exist), and also potentially offensive to those who asked the question. then ok, it was a misunderstanding, but the phrase stands there and concurs to surrealism.

at this point, without giving the op an answer that can be used by one who is evidently at first arms, a fantastic struggle begins between two factions:
1. vectorizers are exceptional programs, how would we live without? I always use them is the only way;
2. vectorizers are a caxxata immonda, you have no idea that "ball break", at this point we remove the corkscrews.

remaining that from these threads, reading among the comments, there is always so much to learn and that is why I always read them, but in fact if you throw a bone to two hungry dogs they get less blue.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

"is absurd even as thought,"

You say that's what made him run? If that's how I apologize.
I have opened a world of which I confess I was completely ignorant, or better I know that there is vectorization, but I considered it practical for small formats, not for a0, although I did not understand how much it is within reach of all in terms of equipment and costs.
So I admit I was arrogant in my answer and I apologize again

 

[+forte]

Well but this forum has always been a very quarrelsome place, I enrolled here the first time in 2006, I know it well
Sometimes it reminds me of military service and practices of nonnism,
Did you just sign up? You're a fool
If you can hold hard, go out fortified:d

 

[Fulvio Romano]

You say that's what made him run? If that's how I apologize.

I have not said this, and with purely heuristic approach I can prove the opposite. If he had offended, he would have responded. Unfortunately the meteors are many, we have seen them.

 

[thelittlesniper]

You're off the road. I said the thread is surreal, not the subject treated.
starts with an op, engineer, who asks a lawful question, but does so with the language from which it clearly transposes that it is not of the profession. use "export" instead of importing, does not know the term "vettorialization" or "scannerization", etc. is not a criticism eh, is only a statement.

follows with a "it is absurd even only as thought", a technically unsuitable phrase to reality (otherwise vectorizers would not exist), and also potentially offensive to those who asked the question. then ok, it was a misunderstanding, but the phrase stands there and concurs to surrealism.

at this point, without giving the op an answer that can be used by one who is evidently at first arms, a fantastic struggle begins between two factions:
1. vectorizers are exceptional programs, how would we live without? I always use them is the only way;
2. vectorizers are a caxxata immonda, you have no idea that "ball break", at this point we remove the corkscrews.

remaining that from these threads, reading among the comments, there is always so much to learn and that is why I always read them, but in fact if you throw a bone to two hungry dogs they get less blue.

I agree, in fact it would have been enough to put the various solutions with their pros and their cons, while pointing out the inaccuracy of the request. is a technical forum not that of the academy of the bran!
anyway every so often pop-corn and discussions "colored" do not spoil!!!

 

[Fulvio Romano]

anyway every so often pop-corn and discussions "colored" do not spoil!!!

until they remain of this tenor yes, in fact I allowed myself a joke before the souls warmed up. because then it is so often that it ends.

 

[Tristus]

starts with an op, engineer, who asks a lawful question, but does so with the language from which it clearly transposes that it is not of the profession. use "export" instead of importing, does not know the term "vettorialization" or "scannerization", etc. is not a criticism eh, is only a statement.

I personally don't mind some linguistic straphalcions with which the Italian language is bullied. But I know them, and I highlight them when I can.

This specific case deserves a little clemency because in the end it is a new terminology linked to computer science, which is young science.
But look what I'm doing is about the whole Italian company. even journalists. so many of them... that would do better to re-frequence schools. to read some comments on social media... (let us lose the case of salentoesoncontent to which we could grant attenuating) but for the rest... We're losing our tongue.

 

[Fulvio Romano]

I personally don't mind some linguistic straphalcions with which the Italian language is bullied. But I know them, and I highlight them when I can.

This specific case deserves a little clemency because in the end it is a new terminology linked to computer science, which is young science.
But look what I'm doing is about the whole Italian company. even journalists. so many of them... that would do better to re-frequence schools. to read some comments on social media... (let us lose the case of salentoesoncontent to which we could grant attenuating) but for the rest... We're losing our tongue.

I generally agree with you. However here we do not talk about not knowing the Italian language. phrases are grammatically, syntactically and semantically correct. It's like I said, "I pressed the brake pedal to increase the speed of the car." do you see grammatical errors?

or, thinner, "I was uphill, I had to accelerate to maintain the constant speed" where "accelerating" is going to "press the accelerator" and not accelerate in the technical sense of the term.

if one does another job, not knowing the correct words is lawful.

 

[liber]

se stamp your letter does not stand out if it comes from vectorization or the original

it could be true, only that you must after having modified I would say the interested part, to put the drawing on a photo editing and to delete that part, if it is an old obvious design you see a beautiful yellow patina, fault of heliocopy and of the years spent, the measurements on gloss paper sometimes not to change (with tin) an entire design they would mislead but they were false (direct experience), the all is in the solutions that you choose

 

[liber]

[quonte] -tristus- [/quote]I have already made the maps of error we have also the vectors we are on horseback, to make you happy I have used them also on the maps catastalis, but they are of the carriers blandi, imagine the passage of a whole sheet of map a3, converted in b/w and then vectorized, already the points between them did not correspond to the 100 mt, if you climbed all of a certain portion I was carrying to 100 others

 

[Tristus]

already the maps of error have of its we put also the vectorizers we are riding,

Besides... the alternative to digitization in general, is to polish the paper map. or to put it on a sheet of glossy paper (a few years ago this was the procedure, and also the cadasus provided a special module in gloss paper to recalcate the map).
Even the polishing work was not accurate. So, it was worth trying with vectorization programs and setting up the plotter to draw on gloss.

 

[Tristus]

I did it because I was a high-mountain sheet and really there were 4 lines, 4 buildings scattered, I needed more 'as a guide linking it to the various ctr and orthophotos that real measures eppo in the mountains for the paths 1 or 2 meters are always relative

depends also on the map scale. working scale 1/4000 a millimeter on paper are 4 meters in reality.
today the catasto is accurate, you work coordinates. So it's not as important as paper. are the coordinates of the vertices that give the value of the position. coordinates that over the years have been "glued" by reliefs leaning to the trust points. reliefs made or with total stations, or with gps instrumentation. today is all very precise

 

[liber]

perfectly accurate tristus, but I wrote above why I served a vectorizer, and its use on the field, in that case for the paths it was enough also a trecching gps, was not required that high precision, depending on the job a person adapts, if I have to trace a big way a path and give of the slopes and all this has to end in a brochure of a foldable mountain path, that I do harm a cannon I take a normal net, I bribe the pay is always that and the results are great for that representation. If then one wants to arm himself up and do a dummy job for a crappy pay, his business.