• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

watermark removal of the education version with the use of autocad full

  • Thread starter Thread starter ilbona
  • Start date Start date
Uh, discussion philosophically interesting, but realistically useless.
dwg has become an open file format (opendwg before and dwgdirect after they manage it in all conditions, in a very legal manner).
You should protect the software, not its product.
what is it to mark a file infamy when you open it with any cadfree (from draftsight to nanocad) and clean it well?
the watermark remains only if the file remains in the adesk supply chain. You couldn't get out of the chain. today the dwg is open/saved by an infinity of programs.
so maybe you get a file saved by allplan, rather than archicad and the effect you have is equal to that coming from an educational pass for nanocad.
or worse, you pass through the hands a file coming from a slender version of acad, which is more immaculate than that of the edu version whitened with pearl.. .
This is unfortunately the other side of the medal of "fidelization" operated by adesk over the years.
 
Uh, discussion philosophically interesting, but realistically useless. . .
Not so much philosophy. using an educational software to work is an offense. philosophy seems to me that inherent considerations on the various ways to "recycle" the files with the watermark passing through other software because the dwg is an open format.
what is it to mark a file infamy when you open it with any cadfree (from draftsight to nanocad) and clean it well?
What is it to get the money in a lawful manner by selling jewels and releasing the receipt, when passing through appropriate characters you can clean up the one obtained from the theft of similar jewels without even having to release the receipt or pay the supplier? :rolleyes:

ah, by the way, there is no infamy in having a watermark with "educational" writing, since those who created that file did it just for the precise purpose indicated by the waternark.
the infamy is (except specific cases that have not yet emerged, so for now there are) in wanting to remove it by putting it in that place to those that the files without watermark produce them (or buy them) with regular licenses.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top