autocad 2010 lento su windows 7 home 64 bit

[ghimax867]

Can you tell me why autocad 2010 is slow at least on my computer?
Is it a hardware or software problem?
quad core processor 2,44 mhz q6600
7 gb ram 667 mhz
picture graphics card fx 5600
hd 500 gb
windows 7 home

 

[Shape]

Can you tell me why autocad 2010 is slow at least on my computer?
Is it a hardware or software problem?
quad core processor 2,44 mhz q6600
7 gb ram 667 mhz
picture graphics card fx 5600
hd 500 gb
windows 7 home

I don't think so. seen the characteristics

mmmm......

have you installed service pack?

I don't really play that windows 7 home... .

I don't know how and what problems there may be on windows 7 yet I haven't been able to verify it... Why a home?

 

[ghimax867]

I installed w7 home because they recommended it... I omitted that I installed it to 64bit...
I didn't install the service pack. . .

 

[PlannerRoad]

I installed w7 home because they recommended it... I omitted that I installed it to 64bit...
I didn't install the service pack. . .

more 64-bit reason should go faster.
install the service pack:
http://usa.autodesk.com/adsk/servlet/ps/dl/item?siteid=123112&id=13760520&linkid=9240618since recently released there are not yet many "experiences" of the report windows 7 - autocad 2010.

 

[rpor66]

what makes me smile and that now everyone recommends seven, which is only seen with small changes, no more xp, now "superato".
in your case it is however indicated seven x64, given the amount of ram mounted.
the home version is fine, the professional does not give extra performance, only functionality, which for what concerns autocad have little to do.
see verify the configuration of the picture in autocad, go to performance settings, check whipthread, set to 3, install the servicepack.
Remember that in any case autocad is a program that in 90% of cases uses a cpu, your while being a quad, goes only to 2.4ghz that is not so much.
Of course, all relative, would like to understand what it means for you "to plan"; compared to what?

Let us know, bye.

 

[Shape]

I installed w7 home because they recommended it... I omitted that I installed it to 64bit...
I didn't install the service pack. . .

cmq regarding the 64 bit I have to say that even I noticed some anomaly, I have a 64-bit xp pro and sometimes (only sometimes) even the simple object copy option (also only line or circle) requires a couple of seconds.. .

probably the performance of 64 bits is still to be settled because I also installed a 2007 and in the same file the above-mentioned openings in 1 millisecond.

I installed the service pack but little changed. to do the test of the nine I would like to install the 2010 36_6_6: 2020) to 32 to see if the problem is 2010 or only for 64 bit.

 

[PlannerRoad]

...I installed the service pack but little changed. to do the test of the nine I would like to install the 2020 a 32 to see if the problem is 2010 or only for 64 bit.

At least let us know what it is!
this means anticipating the times!!! :biggrin:

 

[GP.]

means that autodesk believes shape the engelist n.1

 

[Shape]

At least let us know what it is!
this means anticipating the times!!! :biggrin:

means that autodesk believes shape the engelist n.1

sin that I am not a supermod but only an evangelist because you would be to ban both.... :36_6_3:

 

[ardu]

what makes me smile and that now everyone recommends seven, which is only seen with small changes, no more xp, now "superato".
in your case it is however indicated seven x64, given the amount of ram mounted.
the home version is fine, the professional does not give extra performance, only functionality, which for what concerns autocad have little to do.
see verify the configuration of the picture in autocad, go to performance settings, check whipthread, set to 3, install the servicepack.
Remember that in any case autocad is a program that in 90% of cases uses a cpu, your while being a quad, goes only to 2.4ghz that is not so much.
Of course, all relative, would like to understand what it means for you "to plan"; compared to what?

Let us know, bye.

It is not for nothing true what you wrote, windows 7 is definitely more performing and windows view.. that to say all was really an os microsoft. windows 7 regarding me, using it and testing it a little, is another planet.meditate... who speaks normally uses linux or mac.

 

[rpor66]

It's not true what you wrote, windows 7 is definitely more performing and windows view. . to say it all was just an os microsoft. windows 7 regarding me, using it and testing it a little, is another planet.meditate... who speaks normally uses linux or mac.

but is it spontaneous or did you have to think about what you wrote?
but in which part of my post is it written that view is more performing than seven?

 

[PlannerRoad]

because of curiosity, the autodesk has released a list of programs that are tested and working correctly on windows 7 (including autocad).
the list is this:
http://usa.autodesk.com/adsk/servlet/ps/dl/item?siteid=123112&id=14053691&linkid=9240617here instead are noted some defects or limitations in the use of autocad on the new operating system:
http://usa.autodesk.com/adsk/servlet/ps/dl/item?siteid=123112&id=14056350&linkid=9240617
http://usa.autodesk.com/adsk/servlet/ps/dl/item?siteid=123112&id=14056444&linkid=9240617

 

[effedieffedi]

It is not a computer or s.o problem. no less than sevice pack
It's an autocad-related software problem.
Unfortunately, the "quad core" and the "frame card" serve them very little (practically to nothing) with this software.

 

[Tristan]

It is not a computer or s.o problem. no less than sevice pack
It's an autocad-related software problem.
Unfortunately, the "quad core" and the "frame card" serve them very little (practically to nothing) with this software.

What would you recommend to take advantage of 101% a quad core and a picture?

 

[effedieffedi]

What would you recommend to take advantage of 101% a quad core and a picture?

easy: a native software in opengl that besides exploiting "all" the cores (and not only 1 or 2) also has way to use the opengl graphic accelerator (frame card).

Unfortunately, as I always tell my students, autocad is the most famous sotware cad from "ciuck" that besides not to use opengl, it is not even able to use the hardware resources of the pc.

to us caddisti it would be good that autocad uses only directx ... you just need to know and you adapt but (in addition to the damage the beffe) if you talk about 3d, there are multiple unresolved bugs also with 2011 that create additional latency during the zoom and rotation of the 3d models in any mode mode different from the wireframe.
It follows that it is not advisable to draw in 3d anything more complex than it is a ball and four cubes.

for the 2d .. so much hat, and it would also be a great 3d .. if only they improved (returned once again from scratch) the graphic engine.

I conclude by quoting one of my favorite articleshttp://natonelbronx.wordpress.com/2...ustizia-che-paghiamo-tutti-opengl-vs-directx/

 

[Tristan]

easy: a native software in opengl that besides exploiting "all" the cores (and not only 1 or 2) also has way to use the opengl graphic accelerator (frame card).

Unfortunately, as I always tell my students, autocad is the most famous sotware cad from "ciuck" that besides not to use opengl, it is not even able to use the hardware resources of the pc.

to us caddisti it would be good that autocad uses only directx ... you just need to know and you adapt but (in addition to the damage the beffe) if you talk about 3d, there are multiple unresolved bugs also with 2011 that create additional latency during the zoom and rotation of the 3d models in any mode mode different from the wireframe.
It follows that it is not advisable to draw in 3d anything more complex than it is a ball and four cubes.

for the 2d .. so much hat, and it would also be a great 3d .. if only they improved (returned once again from scratch) the graphic engine.

I conclude by quoting one of my favorite articleshttp://natonelbronx.wordpress.com/2...ustizia-che-paghiamo-tutti-opengl-vs-directx/

I thought you were another quaqquaraqqua instead I see you're expert :finger: :biggrin:
but I can only give you reason!

 

[Giuseppe Mauro]

what makes me smile and that now everyone recommends seven, which is only seen with small changes, no more xp, now "superato".

:smile: I would say that the small difference between seven and sight is more or less the one that was between 95 and 2000 :smile: that's an abyss.
the seven is stable and solid, eliminating the useless ornaments of the aero and windows crystal style, it also becomes fast.

view seemed more a beta version of 7, than a true s.o.

 

[Giuseppe Mauro]

It follows that it is not advisable to draw in 3d anything more complex than it is a ball and four cubes.

I have a different wrist, maybe I'm wrong.

this roote with 3dorbit both in realistic view, and conceptual, without any latency or crash.
and I don't think it's four balls:

Of course, I have a quadcore like our friend... but I miss the picture (I only have a hd4870 from 1gb - will be this?) and I also miss 3 of its 7 gb ram

 

[effedieffedi]

I have a different wrist, maybe I'm wrong.

this roote with 3dorbit both in realistic view, and conceptual, without any latency or crash.
and I don't think it's four balls:

Of course, I have a quadcore like our friend... but I miss the picture (I only have a hd4870 from 1gb - will be this?) and I also miss 3 of its 7 gb ram

^^ I would like to hope that of objects such as the attached one, you can rotate at the same time even a dozen or more ... but it completely changes if you have to rotate a simple structure made for example of hea profiles ... a very normal carpentry that literally "sedere" the 3d orbit, only using a fifteenth of elements.

When I have to use 60 beams, I'm forced to make mortal jumps to understand how my model is oriented and to work on it without overburring.
I could draw profiles more crudely by eliminating bevels and fittings... But he's really stronger than me I'm a perfectionist and everything has to be as detailed as in reality.

I have a geforce 9600 gt... costs 100 euros and there is very well with ddraw;
Of course with a current nvidia I would double and more, the graphic performance... but the price/performance ratio is economically a bit disadvantageous.. I don't want to spend 400 euros.
However, it is true that it is the goal that justifies the means, but it is also that a technology better than what they are selling me, already exists for several years. I don't want to be the first in the last one that refracts the economic business of step-tecnology always comrando the last card just out, I'm sure that in 1 year with 100 euros I will buy the gtx 480 (which dreamoooo!!!)

 

[Giuseppe Mauro]

^^ I would like to hope that of objects such as the attached one, you can rotate at the same time even a dozen or more ... but it completely changes if you have to rotate a simple structure made for example of hea profiles ... a very normal carpentry that literally "sedere" the 3d orbit, only using a fifteenth of elements.

When I have to use 60 beams, I'm forced to make mortal jumps to understand how my model is oriented and to work on it without overburring.
I could draw profiles more crudely by eliminating bevels and fittings... But he's really stronger than me I'm a perfectionist and everything has to be as detailed as in reality.

I have a geforce 9600 gt... costs 100 euros and there is very well with ddraw;
Of course with a current nvidia I would double and more, the graphic performance... but the price/performance ratio is economically a bit disadvantageous.. I don't want to spend 400 euros.

I think you have problems with the video card...
the images you see attached, are of a model composed on acad2006 and I managed quietly on a laptop with a radeon mobility with shared memory, procio repentum4 and "ben" 512mb ram.
because I am as perfect as you, I have not dreamed of approx. 700 he that make up the model. then there are the sects, some curves.
opened today with 2010, realistic or conceptual view, the 3d0rbit slips that is a show.
There are slowdowns in dynamic zoom, but I can also understand. . .