links between parts belonging to different groups

[biz]

Good morning.
is there a possibility to maintain links between different groups? For example, in the assembly environment I create different parts connected to each other, then of course transferring one or more parts into different groups links must be interrupted.There is a method to overcome this problem, as well as using paritetic variables, for example.

 

[reb_bl]

Good morning.
is there a possibility to maintain links between different groups? For example, in the assembly environment I create different parts connected to each other, then of course transferring one or more parts into different groups links must be interrupted.There is a method to overcome this problem, as well as using paritetic variables, for example.

Hi.
I'm not sure I understand. would you like to put for example a tube, designed in the axieme a, inside the axieme b and make sure that the path is present and also connected in the axieme b?

 

[biz]

banal example:I have a boxed sheet open on one side, with its stems to support a lid, say flat sheet. in the above-mentioned lembi I will have to make holes in order to be able to support the cover, so the relationship between holes cover and boxed holes is functional.We associate the holes of cover and boxed and we put to add the box to a group a, while the cover to a group b.of course the interpart links will be interrupted, so my question is: is there a quick and effective way to maintain such association (even variables)

 

[Be_on_edge]

banal example:I have a boxed sheet open on one side, with its stems to support a lid, say flat sheet. in the above-mentioned lembi I will have to make holes in order to be able to support the cover, so the relationship between holes cover and boxed holes is functional.We associate the holes of cover and boxed and we put to add the box to a group a, while the cover to a group b.of course the interpart links will be interrupted, so my question is: is there a quick and effective way to maintain such association (even variables)

what matters is the context in which links were created.

boxto.asm contains base.psm and lid.psm which have links between them.
mounting base.psm in a set and lid.psm in a set b will have both interpart relationships still present on boxto.asm while being usable in the new set.
It is understood that changes of related features will be made in the boxed axieme.asm as context in which they are created.

a way to have everything updated is to insert boxed.asm even inside the axieme to, from property occurrence you can set it as a reference element and its function is to update the relationships between lid.psm and base.psm in the context of the axieme that contains them.

 

[biz]

Clear.
but in a more complex context, where I have several groups, subgroups, therefore various details, how do I maintain the association between a part contained in a group a and subgroup a1 with a part contained in a group b and subgroup b1, for example? if I create a part with the command "creates part in the given position" in a large set, and this part I would like it to be associated with a part belonging to a group just different to

 

[Be_on_edge]

Clear.
but in a more complex context, where I have several groups, subgroups, therefore various details, how do I maintain the association between a part contained in a group a and subgroup a1 with a part contained in a group b and subgroup b1, for example? if I create a part with the command "creates part in the given position" in a large set, and this part I would like it to be associated with a part belonging to a group just different to

I don't understand what you want to get, why create the part in the context if the links must have them in context b ?

Either way you can create direct links through the variable table (by means of paste link copy) or with the 'copy part' by importing geometry directly from a file.

 

[biz]

I don't understand what you want to get, why create the part in the context if the links must have them in context b ?

Either way you can create direct links through the variable table (by means of paste link copy) or with the 'copy part' by importing geometry directly from a file.

I didn't explain well.
in a large group already structured I have to insert a series of new details that should naturally be inserted in turn in groups and subgroups already existing. the new details I create them maybe in total, at level 1, creating links with already existing parts (already inserted in groups and subgroups) and maybe they would be connected to several parts belonging to different subgroups. I know the variable paritetic command, but I wondered if there was a way to maintain the association quickly even if I moved a particular from one group to another (other example). I have reported different examples, but to shed light on a common problem with various cases.

 

[Be_on_edge]

I didn't explain well.
in a large group already structured I have to insert a series of new details that should naturally be inserted in turn in groups and subgroups already existing. the new details I create them maybe in total, at level 1, creating links with already existing parts (already inserted in groups and subgroups) and maybe they would be connected to several parts belonging to different subgroups. I know the variable paritetic command, but I wondered if there was a way to maintain the association quickly even if I moved a particular from one group to another (other example). I have reported different examples, but to shed light on a common problem with various cases.

Now it's clear. personally at the end of the project, when I go to organize the parts in subaxis and constructive groups, I tend to stop the connections to avoid undesirable cascading updates. (in the sense that if I make a review I want to have manual control).

Keep in mind that the 'transfer' command in certain situations does not interrupt links as it can make you believe. if the parties you transfer have links to parts you do not transfer then the links will remain valid.

You must always evaluate the 'context' in which the geometry you want to connect to.

if you do not fall into the above situation, to reorganize the assemblies without losing the links there is a somewhat slender but working method:
- through the design manager I go to create a copy of the main axieme with the name of the subgroup I go to create
- during the copy of course I go to update the links on the parts that interest me are part of the subgroup.
- I open the copy and go to eliminate all the parts except those of my interest that will constitute the subgroup
- I open the main axieme and replace\elimino the components that I inserted in the subgroup with the subgroup

I hope to be explained, the topic is complex

p.s.: there is a 'structure manager' tool that should serve to reorganize the axieme while keeping the links; Unfortunately, it is the prerogative of those who use team centers and I have never had a chance to help. I try to find out how he works.

 

[biz]

Now it's clear. personally at the end of the project, when I go to organize the parts in subaxis and constructive groups, I tend to stop the connections to avoid undesirable cascading updates. (in the sense that if I make a review I want to have manual control).

Keep in mind that the 'transfer' command in certain situations does not interrupt links as it can make you believe. if the parties you transfer have links to parts you do not transfer then the links will remain valid.

You must always evaluate the 'context' in which the geometry you want to connect to.

if you do not fall into the above situation, to reorganize the assemblies without losing the links there is a somewhat slender but working method:
- through the design manager I go to create a copy of the main axieme with the name of the subgroup I go to create
- during the copy of course I go to update the links on the parts that interest me are part of the subgroup.
- I open the copy and go to eliminate all the parts except those of my interest that will constitute the subgroup
- I open the main axieme and replace\elimino the components that I inserted in the subgroup with the subgroup

I hope to be explained, the topic is complex

p.s.: there is a 'structure manager' tool that should serve to reorganize the axieme while keeping the links; Unfortunately, it is the prerogative of those who use team centers and I have never had a chance to help. I try to find out how he works.

It should be implemented directly in itself.