Salentoesoncontento
Guest
Hello, everyone. I would kindly like to know if there is a method to export a drawing on sheet format a0 directly in digital format dwg.
MassiVonWeizen
Guest
It is absurd even as thought.
thelittlesniper
Guest
you can digitize it in pdf with a special scanner for large formats after which to turn the pdf file into vector dwg (three of the services, even free of charge, online).
I discourage you because vectorization makes a bunch of microlinese and/or polylinee that you get crazy. Alternatively, you can put the pdf as a reference in your dwg and draw on it or, if you have time, digitalize it yourself line by line. even in these last solutions however pdf slows down a lot of design to every single pan/zoom!! !
I discourage you because vectorization makes a bunch of microlinese and/or polylinee that you get crazy. Alternatively, you can put the pdf as a reference in your dwg and draw on it or, if you have time, digitalize it yourself line by line. even in these last solutions however pdf slows down a lot of design to every single pan/zoom!! !
Cristallo
Guest
ot:
We return to the speech of expressing ourselves in Italian. . .
export -> bring out. he wants to bring out a drawing on sheet size a0... then it is natural to think "woman how arzygogular to say I want to print"
then read "directly in dwg" format... and your arms fall.
end
We return to the speech of expressing ourselves in Italian. . .
export -> bring out. he wants to bring out a drawing on sheet size a0... then it is natural to think "woman how arzygogular to say I want to print"
then read "directly in dwg" format... and your arms fall.
end
MassiVonWeizen
Guest
the title expressly declares da Letter a dwg.
for me the meaning of the prepositions remained that of 30 years ago, if it was changed with some school reform, or some popular referendum given in hands to illiterate people, I would like to be informed
for me the meaning of the prepositions remained that of 30 years ago, if it was changed with some school reform, or some popular referendum given in hands to illiterate people, I would like to be informed
+forte
Guest
Perhaps the little knowing of matter is expressed in inadequate terms
Anyway (exhalesoncontent)) First you buy https://www.canon.it/scanners/large-format-scanners/ And then you buy https://www.autodesk.it/products/autocad/included-toolsets/autocad-raster-design
Anyway (exhalesoncontent)) First you buy https://www.canon.it/scanners/large-format-scanners/ And then you buy https://www.autodesk.it/products/autocad/included-toolsets/autocad-raster-design
thelittlesniper
Guest
I didn't even know that.... great info.
liber
Guest
all automatic or semi-automatic vectorizers like raster design, are useful for many things, except for vectorizing, raster design you can import georeferential images, you can merge raster, you can manipulate raster, you can cut raster, in short, rasters in all sauces, but vectorization is not just one of the strengths, what is a real point of force for vectoring is in a software way.
ale47p
Guest
bella questa :lol:
+forte
Guest
:roflmao::roflmao::roflmao::roflmao::roflmao::roflmao::roflmao::roflmao::roflmao::roflmao::roflmao::roflmao::roflmao::roflmao::roflmao::roflmaoflmaohttps://knowledge.autodesk.com/it/s...-convert-raster-shapes-to-vector-objects.html it would also be advisable to do without programs for reverse engineering and photogrammetry and remove the corkscrews
fallo tu :roflmao::roflmao::roflmao::roflmao::roflmao::roflmao::roflmao::roflmao::roflmao:::roflmao::roflmao:::roflmao::io mi tengo i miei utilisimi programmi
Tristan
Guest
If you have never vectorized with raster design you have no idea what a pain in the balls is... it also works only for 1-bit images. I share the thought of @liber
+forte
Guest
another answer:
I got it.
small audition with an image, part of another mail from me here https://www.cad3d.it/forum1/threads...paghi-drafsight-a-fine-anno.55766/post-434824
It's a wonder.Let us make a practical example:
comes from you a new customer with a two ten a0 and without dwg,project made by other firm,
asks for various changes
you two redesign all ten a0, oil of elbow
,I only vectorize what I need to change
Let's see who breaks the balls:
Tristan
Guest
But I'm not fucking putting it on?you two redesign all ten a0, oil of elbow
I only vectorize what I need to change
Let's see who breaks the balls:
I only redesign the part that interests me and that I need to change, and in the meantime that you recheck all measures and systems the errors of vectorization I have finished the job.
Hello!
+forte
Guest
in una cosa sola c'hai ragione
sti cazzi:roflmao::roflmao::roflmao::roflmao::roflmao::roflmao::roflmao::roflmao::roflmao::roflmao::roflmao::roflmao::roflmao
Tristus
Guest
depends on what you want to get, and what you need work for. The job can be done with one step. But in 100 percent of cases, the resulting dwg will not contain continuous and clean lines, but an endless series of lines and lines, points etc. that will describe only in a big way what was in the table and more will make that dwg a very heavy file to handle, because very large.
If you want a cleaner job then you have to do more steps to properly vectorize every line and every element of the design.
Ultimately, the paper board can be vectorized in dwg (this is the exact term). If you're not demanding, a fast scanner envelops you. It's up to you to decide whether the result can go well or not. You usually work so much they need more steps just to "clean" what comes out of the scanner, otherwise they come out very heavy files and very difficult to manage.
If you want a cleaner job then you have to do more steps to properly vectorize every line and every element of the design.
Ultimately, the paper board can be vectorized in dwg (this is the exact term). If you're not demanding, a fast scanner envelops you. It's up to you to decide whether the result can go well or not. You usually work so much they need more steps just to "clean" what comes out of the scanner, otherwise they come out very heavy files and very difficult to manage.
Tristus
Guest
These vectorization programs are of great utility.
However, as long as it vectorizes simple and well contrasted forms in color the errors in vectorization are few, so it is worth using them. And here you're right to sell.
But try to vectorize a catastral map. I did it when the cadasian still had hand-drawn maps with the rapidgraph. how good was the vectorization program (I remember that I used a corel utility) when the program met the numbers that technicians assigned to the plots of land.... were pains. by force of things you had to re-type the texts by hand. lines were often split, sometimes double, triple, quadruple.
and here the reason is on the side of tristan. You do first to re-type what the scanner misinterprets, otherwise you don't go out.
I don't want to demonize these programs. clearly have limits, even the newest. But they can actually be of great help.
GP.
Guest
for once I do not think it as a tristan, we take for example a table a0 to change in a small part.
if you stamp your letter does not stand out if it comes from vectorization or the original, in a short time you can then operate on the affected part from the changes.
Of course we cannot expect to have a perfect cad file, but it depends, precisely, on the use that it does and the result that you want to achieve.
to me many times saved my life...
if you stamp your letter does not stand out if it comes from vectorization or the original, in a short time you can then operate on the affected part from the changes.
Of course we cannot expect to have a perfect cad file, but it depends, precisely, on the use that it does and the result that you want to achieve.
to me many times saved my life...
Tristus
Guest
so much of autocad raster design. I saw it in action... Maybe I had it when I vectored the old cadastrals at 4000.
Many colleagues had a graphic tablet.
ard even makes an optical recognition of characters.
Fulvio Romano
Guest
This thread is surreal. . .
Tristus
Guest
If you explain why we'd be grateful. so far we have seen a treadh opening with a request for information about the, "export" of a not well-specified design carrying it from paper support in dwg. we all understood what he intended to ask Salentoesoncontent.
In the rest of the discussions, it has debated whether or not the use of programmes to transform paper into dwg, i.e. digitizing paper. I think it's legit.
vectorization is a way to digitize something by changing the support in which it is. When we scan the photos to save them in the hard disk we're digitalizing them but not vectorizing.
the case that we are dealing instead previews the vectorization.
there are several methods to vectorize. Once we used a lot of graphic tablets to vectorize a cathartic map, i.e. the a4 sheet was placed on the tablet and with the mouse of the tablet itself (which had a cross-link) we centered the highlights of the map and we clicked with the mouse for autocad to acquire that point by assigning it of the coordinates (in 2d of course).
today you make wide use of programs that help in this process, going to them to interpret what came out of the scanner. some find useful these programs and others prefer old systems.
in the light of all this the discussion is legitimate and not surreal.
Last edited: