They're not his cabbage, they're all cabbage!! It's like when in the fantastic Italian 1 out of 10 pays taxes and in the end who gets in the ass is always the honest one. It's time to end it! !When I get elaborated with didactic version it is obvious that the author did the trick to save something.
about in googleI have a regular autocad license lt 2010. I received a dwg file with a project made with a didactic version. when I copy/neck information from this file received to mine, there appears a message that warns me that in the printing phase the watermark of autodesk will appear. is it possible to overcome the problem?
Thank you.
I have doubts whether watermak removal is a legal action while using a regular full license. using only education is not legal to remove it. . .
...when in the fantastic Italian 1 out of 10 pays the taxes and in the end who if the lap in the ass is always the honest one.. .
agree on everything, but there is also to understand the Labin when he says:I would call 117 and ask him to visit that individual. . .
to bypass the obstacle you could do as I had already suggested in the thread linked by plannerroad, or print with 3/4 cm of margin around the square in order to cut out then the writing..... I, owner of 7 regular licenses, must go out with elaborates with the word "didactic version of autocad" is an absurd thing that penalizes me a lot. . .
are autocad commands.... we would miss that you can't suggest! ! !agree on everything, but there is also to understand the Labin when he says:
to bypass the obstacle you could do as I had already suggested in the thread linked by plannerroad, or print with 3/4 cm of margin around the square in order to cut out then the writing.
But...
:36_6_6:
I turned on a light bulb and I checked: is from 5 or 6 versions that autocad has the tool to remove the writing, strange that no one has ever noticed.
I ask planner, as moderator, if I may suggest. . .
Oh, are autocad commands :mixed:, non taroctools.
I don't know what your case is, but if you had to pay or fall into some subcontracting relationship then you too, and not just those who use software illegally, you saved something. even you had passed a student, I think it would certainly be your own cabbages because you use material produced in an illicit way as initially intended for educational purposes and your "image" would get damaged twice. .When I get elaborated with didactic version it is obvious that the author did the trick to save something. Your cabbage. but that I, owner of 7 regular licenses, must go out with elaborates with the written "didactic version of autocad" is an absurd thing that penalizes me a lot. especially from the point of view of the image towards my customers. What balls. Thank you for the answer and I apologize for the rash. I'll try to hear autodesk by phone.
with this system cleans the file from every trace of the educational version that created it?esportadgn - importdgn
I wouldn't have thought about it.esportadgn - importdgn
It's a wise reflection. . .I don't know what your case is, but if you had to pay or fall into some subcontracting relationship then you too, and not just those who use software illegally, you saved something. even you had passed a student, I think it would certainly be your own cabbages because you use material produced in an illicit way as initially intended for educational purposes and your "image" would get damaged twice. .
generally not...but then in the college tables maybe the thesis reads " educational version"? I bet teachers don't even want to see those writings.
also with the latest dwg file versions?always
save in dxf
open the dxf
also with the latest dwg file versions?
marcof said:I don't know what your case is, but if you had to pay or fall into some subcontracting relationship then you too, and not just those who use software illegally, you saved something. even you had passed a student, I think it would certainly be your own cabbages because you use material produced in an illicit way as initially intended for educational purposes and your "image" would get damaged twice. .
So your student son could use a student version to work for you? I have the escamotage would make water from all sides...It's a wise reflection. . .
but hypotheses: if for example who realizes the design does it purely free of charge, with an education version, and gives me the files, in that case I, that would make use of those files as a basis then for my job, legally in what conditions would I find myself?
I knew it was public, but I think the argument is still protected by copyright. by public means that it is consultable at the faculty archive or that it is possible, of any thesis, to make a paper copy or to duplicate the possible digital version and to use it without problems for work?if to do my job I have to use the material of a graduation thesis?
thesis is public, and drawings can be made in educational version
I think there is a difference between using the "knowledge" you can acquire by reading a thesis (or a book) and using computer material produced with software that explicitly provides that the use of those files should not have commercial purposes.I, in my work, am not saving anything, am using public material. as if using information found with google.
I wasn't rhetorical. the thesis is public in the sense that, I professional, can go to university and consult it, as well as I can consult the norms and publications if they are in the library.I knew it was public, but I think the argument is still protected by copyright. by public means that it is consultable at the faculty archive or that it is possible, of any thesis, to make a paper copy or to duplicate the possible digital version and to use it without problems for work?
I think there is a difference between using the "knowledge" you can acquire by reading a thesis (or a book) and using computer material produced with software that explicitly provides that the use of those files should not have commercial purposes.