• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

delivery st3

  • Thread starter Thread starter dacampo
  • Start date Start date
I don't know sw, but I think if he has things that sw no nabbia, for example synchronous technology.
that of the scale would be useful, but personally I do not see it so important, I manage it with a persnalized property.
I would personally prefer a command that manages the "pattern table" that is now missing, rather than many other useful things whose list would be quite nourished.
I don't know either swx, I've seen fast demos (half hour, an hour at max), but my former colleague knew it well that came from this cad and used it from 98 until 2006. He explained to me well certain things that he did and swx compared to if, and also the contrary, when at the time I did the basic course to learn to use if and were born certain discussions (constructive). He told me that swx also has its bugs, shortcomings and when you plan there is no one, it is not that I described it as the best cad in the world.

the speech that if it has synchronous technology and others does not, for me it leaves the time it finds, because so far I have to find someone who confirms me that from st1 or st2 works in synchronous, even at least part. at the presentation of st3 in mogliano veneto last month, I spoke with several people I know and all those who told me that they do not use any synchronous environment (par, psm, asm), both for the fact of working with the historian (machines, models, etc. created with previous versions of which it makes no sense to revert everything), both because for the product they do and for how it is managed find more convenient the old parametric system.

Now that st3 has made a qualitative leap compared to previous versions I do not question it, at the moment I can not draw conclusions to stretch me more than much since it is 1 week or little more than I have installed it in the office.

then write this: that of the scale would be useful, but personally I do not see it so important, I manage it with a persnalized property.Could you explain in detail what you do so I try to see if your solution can do for me? Thank you.
 
I would like them to copy from sw the possibility to enter a 3d view in the table and then in a secondmoment to change the orientation to the flight directly from the table.
 
I would like them to copy from sw the possibility to enter a 3d view in the table and then in a secondmoment to change the orientation to the flight directly from the table.
this in part you can already do it, create a view in 3d, and use it for the table. when you change the view in 3d the 2d updates.
 
for tequila_pilot:

in my draft template I created a custom property that I call scale, so in the cartiglio I entered a call pointing to the "local" property of the draft scale. accessing this value I change the scale property present in all carts.
 
for tequila_pilot:

in my draft template I created a custom property that I call scale, so in the cartiglio I entered a call pointing to the "local" property of the draft scale. accessing this value I change the scale property present in all carts.
ok but it is always a work you do manually and you have to remember to change if for any reason you change the scale of the view of the drawing. the same coarse way works what they have entered as a sheet scale, if you have to change the sheet and change scale.
 
ok but it is always a work you do manually and you have to remember to change if for any reason you change the scale of the view of the drawing. the same coarse way works what they have entered as a sheet scale, if you have to change the sheet and change scale.
Yes, but:

1) the change in a place and I am updated all the tables, while with the scale seen each sheet has its own
2) I can always make a macro
 
1) the change in a place and I am updated all the tables, while with the scale seen each sheet has its own
ok but depends on how you manage the boards, I use a draft for each model and together, and no more sheets. then if you need on the same draft file have multiple sheets with different scale drawings as you do? but obviously depends on how one sets the way to work in the company.
2) I can always make a macro
I know there was already a macro that did what to bring back the correct value of the scale automatically but you can't find it on the internet, as it seemed to be an application made by a dealer for a customer.
 
1) I am well with this system: if there is a clover ok, if there are more very well anyway. I do not pose the problem of the different scale because more sheets in the same dft belong technically to the same table, so they must have the same scale

2) I don't know.
 
Hello, everyone.

I got st3 today. I don't know if to install it having already st.
I would like to know if saving files with the latest version my colleague who still has the st version, would he be able to open them anyway? ? ?

thanks to all
 
Hello, everyone.

I got st3 today. I don't know if to install it having already st.
I would like to know if saving files with the latest version my colleague who still has the st version, would he be able to open them anyway? ? ?

thanks to all
Of course not.
 
Thank you.
but it's a trick....! I didn't even install st2 at the time for this problem. Are there demos of st3? Maybe I'll put that to him!
:confused:
Look, it's normal. . .
a lower version does not read higher versions files. . .
demo of st3 in order to get your partner to work?? You're off the road. .
you have to pass all 2 to st3. But where's the problem, I'm sorry, to let him pass if you go?
 
:confused:
Look, it's normal. . .
a lower version does not read higher versions files. . .
demo of st3 in order to get your partner to work?? You're off the road. .
you have to pass all 2 to st3. But where's the problem, I'm sorry, to let him pass if you go?
we have held a license so I can't install it on his own. We're going through solid works...
 
we have held a license so I can't install it on his own. We're going through solid works...
Got it.
so your situation is:
1 maintenance license: Yours
1 license out of maintenance: that of your colleague
Then you have no hope... If you and your partner exchange the parts you have to stay on st.
(I recommend not to look for shortcuts. . . )
 
Got it.
so your situation is:
1 maintenance license: Yours
1 license out of maintenance: that of your colleague
Then you have no hope... If you and your partner exchange the parts you have to stay on st.
(I recommend not to look for shortcuts. . . )
Man, I'm sorry.
Now I will have to face the problem of working with a .par .asm archive using solid works :frown:

Thank you.
 
I ask you that you have used st3 for a few months.
are there advantages at the moment switching to st3 compared to st.
banal question, but before you install it on 10 pcs....

Hi.
 
more stable and customizable interface. That's enough. .
if you use the synchro now is very convenient because from st3 can live with the order inside the same file.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top