Tequila
Guest
I don't know either swx, I've seen fast demos (half hour, an hour at max), but my former colleague knew it well that came from this cad and used it from 98 until 2006. He explained to me well certain things that he did and swx compared to if, and also the contrary, when at the time I did the basic course to learn to use if and were born certain discussions (constructive). He told me that swx also has its bugs, shortcomings and when you plan there is no one, it is not that I described it as the best cad in the world.I don't know sw, but I think if he has things that sw no nabbia, for example synchronous technology.
that of the scale would be useful, but personally I do not see it so important, I manage it with a persnalized property.
I would personally prefer a command that manages the "pattern table" that is now missing, rather than many other useful things whose list would be quite nourished.
the speech that if it has synchronous technology and others does not, for me it leaves the time it finds, because so far I have to find someone who confirms me that from st1 or st2 works in synchronous, even at least part. at the presentation of st3 in mogliano veneto last month, I spoke with several people I know and all those who told me that they do not use any synchronous environment (par, psm, asm), both for the fact of working with the historian (machines, models, etc. created with previous versions of which it makes no sense to revert everything), both because for the product they do and for how it is managed find more convenient the old parametric system.
Now that st3 has made a qualitative leap compared to previous versions I do not question it, at the moment I can not draw conclusions to stretch me more than much since it is 1 week or little more than I have installed it in the office.
then write this: that of the scale would be useful, but personally I do not see it so important, I manage it with a persnalized property.Could you explain in detail what you do so I try to see if your solution can do for me? Thank you.