meccanicamg
Guest
we hope he's interested.... it's his post. I would have already received at least a dozen notification mails.There's a deafening silence from our student. . .
we hope he's interested.... it's his post. I would have already received at least a dozen notification mails.There's a deafening silence from our student. . .
the track has been given to him.. You just have to put in a few numbers.mha.. Perhaps he hoped that the forum enthusiasts would serve the solution on a silver plate.
the title of the post says long.. a professor who cannot help him? :unsures:
I'm not gone, I just don't spend all day in front of the pcThere's a deafening silence from our student. . .
you think about it, but the whole class is struggling. my professor treated the subject only for five minutes, not even making us a sizingmha.. Perhaps he hoped that the forum enthusiasts would serve the solution on a silver plate.
the title of the post says long.. a professor who cannot help him? :unsures:
So carlos, do you have a draft to share?I'm not gone, I just don't spend all day in front of the pc
I'm sorry, I don't want to insist, but the gears made them? how do they measure and verify? as you said before yes.you think about it, but the whole class is struggling. my professor treated the subject only for five minutes, not even making us a sizing
Why with different data? What changes? procedure one must be.I tried to do the exercise with different data, assuming some values
I must also do the fatigue dimensionalization and in this case I must use omega that is obtained from the angle in radiants, fract the time in seconds.I'm sorry, I don't want to insist, but the gears made them? how do they measure and verify? as you said before yes.
here now, it is not a problem to apply lewis .... but understand that 270 degrees are not a turn and therefore development is not a primitive diameter round. . .
that puts us 5 seconds or 70 seconds doesn't need anything in this exercise....unless you check it hard and wear according to norm and impose a number of hours of operation....but I don't think that's what you're asking...unless you know the whole subject.
performance: wheels well work what it means? if rectified 0,99 if you cut creator 0,95 approximately.
because I have the same exercise as my classmate, not now I have only the photo of his exercise (equal to mine with only different data)Why with different data? What changes? procedure one must be.
ok, se devi fare anche ad usura ok.I must also do the fatigue dimensionalization and in this case I must use omega that is obtained from the angle in radiants, fract the time in seconds.
I hypothesized a performance of 0.8 to be able to calculate the power applied on the rack.performance: wheels well work what it means? if rectified 0,99 if you cut creator 0,95 approximately.
I'm sorry, do you have to solve yours and cover yours? who does reasoning? him or you?because I have the same exercise as my classmate, not now I have only the photo of his exercise (equal to mine with only different data)
the main problem is what I can't understand which angle speed to useok, se devi fare anche ad usura ok.
with a 0,8 yield means that the teeth are cut by hand with the pond or however you have many losses for friction and dry work.I hypothesized a performance of 0.8 to be able to calculate the power applied on the rack.
we have reasoned togetherI'm sorry, do you have to solve yours and cover yours? who does reasoning? him or you?
So you recommend using a higher performance?with a performance 0.8 means that the teeth are cut by hand with the pond.