• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

solidworks double rescue

MassiVonWeizen said:
in the other discussion I didn't ask you, but the pdf and dwg of what?
of the file leaves? in this case of a specific view or opening view?
from the drawing file? in such case does these files already exist or should it be created? if it must be created with what views? with quotas?

add more information to circumscribe the need
Click to expand...
Okay, I'm trying to get an image that explains better.
Let's do the example with a screw you.
I have a 3d file called "vite te.sldprt"
in this file there are "n" configurations that are called:
-default
- m4x10
- m4x12
- m4x16
- m4x20
etc.

I create the table of the default model "vite te.slddrw"

I wanted to know if there is a way to put on the table and automatically export the masses to the table of all the configurations that have to be called as the condfiguration, for example:

m4x10.pdf/dwg
m4x12.pdf/dwg
etc. .
 

Attachments

  • flusso.webp
    flusso.webp
    30.7 KB · Views: 52
ah here he now begins to create criteria.
It's about drawing.
two scenarios:
First:
the table must create the macro from scratch.
that template should use
What do you see fit?
What odds must be included?
I see that your example is colored, should you place objects on precise levels?
I don't think of anything else.

Second:
you make the first table with the first configuration.
other configurations must be saved with new design file or replace existing loops until the end of the configurations, so you won't have any slddrw?
Should the odds follow the model or go well where it happens (a screw that from m6x20 when it arrives to m20x120 will have the odds in the middle of the view)?

in both cases the dwg should be exported with mapping files?


to me it seems that the request is not what recently so you have to be very precise in specifying what and how you need it.
I raised only a few points, who makes macro probably well could raise others
 
Massive quoting,
making a table of individual configurations is perhaps less than half the work.
by making the sets in configuration tables, we will certainly find that the views go out of the sheet or overlap, according to how big the views are, should therefore be scaled and positioned, verified if the encumbrances overlap and create a control algorithm that manages this.
I have always avoided making automatic views because 9 out of 10 never go well and you have to put your hands on it, not counting the odds and everything.
surely you can do very much but surely it will not be an excellent job, but a compromise.
then maybe it takes a detail that has been drawn tilted into the plane, so you find it crooked in the table.
could be an investment to make for a company that has special standards and on the standard you can approach a lot, but there is to work a lot.
This is my opinion, however, that I have not made many macros... ?
 
MassiVonWeizen said:
ah here he now begins to create criteria.
It's about drawing.
two scenarios:
First:
the table must create the macro from scratch.
that template should use
What do you see fit?
What odds must be included?
I see that your example is colored, should you place objects on precise levels?
I don't think of anything else.

Second:
you make the first table with the first configuration.
other configurations must be saved with new design file or replace existing loops until the end of the configurations, so you won't have any slddrw?
Should the odds follow the model or go well where it happens (a screw that from m6x20 when it arrives to m20x120 will have the odds in the middle of the view)?

in both cases the dwg should be exported with mapping files?


to me it seems that the request is not what recently so you have to be very precise in specifying what and how you need it.
I raised only a few points, who makes macro probably well could raise others
Click to expand...
then, the "zero" table, that is what would make as a template, would serve me 3 views.
quotas clearly if they followed the model would be better.

Since one of the purposes is to have dwg, it may not be a problem not to have quotas (if it becomes an insurmountable obstacle).

As for configurations, I do not care to have the .slddrw of each configuration, but only dwg and pdf (it would be a layout to give to the customer).

mapping file: I don't care, the dwg must be very primitive, it must be given to the customer and acts as a preliminary layout.

levels: I don’t care about particular levels, just the default ones

I realize it's not a trivial thing, that's why I asked the experts... :
 
jenuary said:
Massive quoting,
making a table of individual configurations is perhaps less than half the work.
by making the sets in configuration tables, we will certainly find that the views go out of the sheet or overlap, according to how big the views are, should therefore be scaled and positioned, verified if the encumbrances overlap and create a control algorithm that manages this.
I have always avoided making automatic views because 9 out of 10 never go well and you have to put your hands on it, not counting the odds and everything.
surely you can do very much but surely it will not be an excellent job, but a compromise.
then maybe it takes a detail that has been drawn tilted into the plane, so you find it crooked in the table.
could be an investment to make for a company that has special standards and on the standard you can approach a lot, but there is to work a lot.
This is my opinion, however, that I have not made many macros... ?
Click to expand...
to tell the truth the question of quotas that intersect would not be a problem:
I'll explain better.

the sldprt file is actually a set of sketches lying on a single floor.
there is no physical solid, but only a set of sketches containing some (poche) parametric quotas that from time to time, depending on the configuration are changed.

so in reality, and here I correlate with what I said before (before I was not exhaustive), appear as 3 views, but actually for swx is a unique view.
I attach a photo, I don't know if I was clear.

If you see they are sketches that lie all on the same floor, so actually the view is unique.
 

Attachments

  • Immagine.webp
    Immagine.webp
    75.2 KB · Views: 56
Let me give you a nice description of the whole speech... that here it has passed from the example of a screw that obviously assumed managed as solid to a rough layout.
and it is the third time I ask you to be precise and clear in your request.
 
MassiVonWeizen said:
Let me give you a nice description of the whole speech... that here it has passed from the example of a screw that obviously assumed managed as solid to a rough layout.
and it is the third time I ask you to be precise and clear in your request.
Click to expand...
the example of the vines was to make it clear to all
the only thing is that the views are not 3 but it is a unique view, this was the only inaccuracy. ...

If there are other things to be clarified I can't know a priori, if not I wouldn't have asked
 
matteo.minghetti said:
You understand 100% what I have to do.
That's exactly it!
It would solve a big problem.
Great!
Click to expand...
Hi.
the macro you see I think has a fifteen years and with the 2015 and later version of solidworks could no longer work because a 32-bit control of which there is no 64-bit version for which I had to move it within a 32-bit access file.
If in these days when I am still at home in forced vacations I try to change it to use it with the latest versions of solidworks
 
pose63 said:
Hi.
the macro you see I think has a fifteen years and with the 2015 and later version of solidworks could no longer work because a 32-bit control of which there is no 64-bit version for which I had to move it within a 32-bit access file.
If in these days when I am still at home in forced vacations I try to change it to use it with the latest versions of solidworks
Click to expand...
Okay.
If you can thank you very much,
You'd solve me a big problem.
Thank you again!
 
Good morning,
I intervene in this discussion to ask for something.
I tried the add-in you posted and it's very useful.
would it be possible to insert other file extensions to be saved?
In particular I would like to save a step file when a part is saved.

Thank you very much.
 
jenuary said:
Good morning, everyone.
I attach Rel. 4.0 to savebackground, after so much expectation.
This version allows you to save files in different paths than the source file according to the modes you see in the attached image.
I have not yet entered the export in "stl" format as required sa xxfast, che salute.

Now we can define a rescue path on which our converted files will go, or automatically create sub folders based on the extension inside the file's residence manager.
remains always in foot the saving of the file in the path of origin as before, without under folders.

installation:
- as for previous versions extract the installation file from the .zip file and launch the program that will install automatically.
- in the case of previous installations in the pc will be overwritten automatically.

inside the zip file you will also find the updated guide.

I hope I was able to settle someone.

View attachment 52082
Click to expand...
hello to all

I am a designer in the mechanical and carpentry sector, and I am involved in the design of generic machines of various types from simple bracket to specific machinery, the customer commits me a project starting from a white sheet, or from a simple idea.


I congratulate jenuary with the excellent work, I have been asking for many years if possible such export, and by chance reading a discussion I have found this wonderful addition that I have installed and use very much.
I ask if in the next revision as already highlighted, and the correction of the check memory on the creation of the folder, if possible to rename the folders, type 01-pdf or 02-dxf only for an organization of the folders, and if possible to implement a function with rescue required, of the type, in the current situation when I press on the button save automatically, for example in the condition of a table mass, saves both pdf format and dxf in automatic processing for here
I ask if you can add a button or more buttons type save by name but only when I think that the design is complete in its parts.

Thank you all for the excellent work done.
 
1596445952110.webpgood morning, if I set the third option (create automatically etc.), at the next restart of solidworks I find again set the first. Is that so or am I wrong?

Thank you.
 
good evening to all, I am a mechanical designer, I congratulate january for the beautiful work he did, I use very often these macros and I wanted to ask for a further favor if possible ...
is it possible to insert in the savebackground tree in the document section part the dxf selection?
and in the table document section selection file step?
I'd be very quick at work. .
Thank you in advance.. .
 

Attachments

  • Release 2.webp
    Release 2.webp
    29.5 KB · Views: 31
Last edited:
good morning, would it be possible to implement in this macro the three-dimensional pdf rescue, at least for the axiemi?
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Total: 11 (members: 0, guests: 11)
Back
Top