• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

delivery st3

  • Thread starter Thread starter dacampo
  • Start date Start date

dacampo

Guest
small survey:
how are you put with the delivery of st3 by your suppliers?

I'm still in another sea. .
 
I downloaded it from the site and installed it without waiting for the supplier. . .
I'm not officially given anything.
 
ccsteam for veneto should deliver within half month as they communicated me Friday during the presentation of st3 for customers
 
ccsteam for veneto should deliver within half month as they communicated me Friday during the presentation of st3 for customers
accc, you could know cabbage....
If I thought about it first I would ask here in the forum who was present Friday.. .
cmq personal opinion st3 does not seem bad
I wanted to be as dear as to all the other presentations and ask him if there is still the error "body type non manifold" and remind him that all the other cads have solved it since 2004, but this time I held back.
strange thing they did not mention (or at least I did not hear it) that now pars can be indistinctly part or sheet, mah....
 
accc, you could know cabbage....
If I thought about it first I would ask here in the forum who was present Friday.. .
cmq personal opinion st3 does not seem bad
I wanted to be as dear as to all the other presentations and ask him if there is still the error "body type non manifold" and remind him that all the other cads have solved it since 2004, but this time I held back.
strange thing they did not mention (or at least I did not hear it) that now pars can be indistinctly part or sheet, mah....
Hi... you could have known each other. I and my former colleague tried to formulate a couple of questions but we were looked at and almost lightninged instantly, which upset me a lot since the presentation was for customers but orchestrated it ad hoc to present a perfect product.
By the way, I thought they were making a presentation by disconnecting from what the videos have been on youtube for 3 months. the modeling of the tank of the grass was the same seen last to padova for the presentation of the st2.
This week I did "forced wounds" (house 1 week in disease) but I hope the st3 arrived or arrives shortly to install it and test it properly. However, I have no great hope of significant improvements and resolution of such problems.
I will try the last way, being that on facebook I have as friendship that of dan staples to send him a direct mail from it and see if by chance he will read it and take it into consideration without being filtered by retailers/assistance etc.

Hi.
 
I will try the last way, being that on facebook I have as friendship that of dan staples to send him a direct mail from it and see if by chance he will read it and take it into consideration without being filtered by retailers/assistance etc.

Hi.
Poor thing, do you want to get him to work even when he's on his facebook? :biggrin:
 
Hi... you could have known each other. I and my former colleague tried to formulate a couple of questions but we were looked at and almost lightninged instantly, which upset me a lot since the presentation was for customers but orchestrated it ad hoc to present a perfect product.
By the way, I thought they were making a presentation by disconnecting from what the videos have been on youtube for 3 months. the modeling of the tank of the grass was the same seen last to padova for the presentation of the st2.
This week I did "forced wounds" (house 1 week in disease) but I hope the st3 arrived or arrives shortly to install it and test it properly. However, I have no great hope of significant improvements and resolution of such problems.
I will try the last way, being that on facebook I have as friendship that of dan staples to send him a direct mail from it and see if by chance he will read it and take it into consideration without being filtered by retailers/assistance etc.

Hi.
I also asked a simple question (if the links between the parts on the assembly are "bidirectional") and, come on, they did not fucilate me, he he he.
Look, I'm tired of being swamped when I just don't want to get caught up in my head (as they did. . )
to the other presentations I have always shredded the marones, this time I have desisted, also because they have passed me a good customer (I know, I am a sold:tongue:)
If you need a copy of the st3, I can pass it through my client who needs thiene.
Let me know.

greetings
silvio
 
I think, even if in this case, good faith is evident.

Bye.
I think not! the license is on the use of the sw, not on the possession of the installation DVD.
With the installer, you just don't do anything.
There is no illegal file, no reference or instigation to pirates or other.
You need to download your license from the zimenz website to get it out.
greetings
silvio
 
I think not! the license is on the use of the sw, not on the possession of the installation DVD.
With the installer, you just don't do anything.
There is no illegal file, no reference or instigation to pirates or other.
You need to download your license from the zimenz website to get it out.
greetings
silvio
Actually, I don't think it's allowed. Clearly it's just a formal question, but it seems to me that one can copy installation cds/dvds only for backup purposes, not to give them to third parties. Moreover if companies put triple passwords on their ftp sites not to download installers if not to authorized users, a reason will be there.
 
accc, you could know cabbage....
If I thought about it first I would ask here in the forum who was present Friday.. .
sin, I had to be there but I couldn't come
strange thing they did not mention (or at least I did not hear it) that now pars can be indistinctly part or sheet, mah....
even in st2 if parts from synchronous part, and turn into sheet the file remains a .par
 
I also asked a simple question (if the links between the parts on the assembly are "bidirectional") and, come on, they did not fucilate me, he he he.
Look, I'm tired of being swamped when I just don't want to get caught up in my head (as they did. . )
to the other presentations I have always shredded the marones, this time I have desisted, also because they have passed me a good customer (I know, I am a sold:tongue:)
If you need a copy of the st3, I can pass it through my client who needs thiene.
Let me know.

greetings
silvio
go quietly for st3 I can also in the morning download it from the zimens license included since I am in maintenance, but for the moment I do not feel the need, I look like I get from the dealer and then anyway since I collaborate externally with an ing. As long as he doesn't pass to st3 I can't play as I want.
Look for the questions my colleague has asked one and they have replied that for the questions they will answer at the end, I have made 1 and they have not understood it because the answer beyond and being vague was not centered anything with the question why I did not even bother to insist.
Let's say that the most interesting part was the chatter with a friend during the music buffet, musical groups, musical instruments, etc. because the presentation as mentioned has disappointed me, I thought in something more targeted instead they reproduced the same things as the videos of youtube on the lawnmower. the presentation of teamcenter I do not say anything since the product I do not use it and do not know it, then in the end I left around 18 or shortly before the presentation of the solidrules program.
 
accc, you could know cabbage....
If I thought about it first I would ask here in the forum who was present Friday.. .
cmq personal opinion st3 does not seem bad
I wanted to be as dear as to all the other presentations and ask him if there is still the error "body type non manifold" and remind him that all the other cads have solved it since 2004, but this time I held back.
strange thing they did not mention (or at least I did not hear it) that now pars can be indistinctly part or sheet, mah....
I mean, you want to tell me that the other cads don't make the whims like "non manifold body"...that is, they can perform what we can't do because of this mistake or then on those operations they plan on them too? :eek:
I'm going to go to solid works tomorrow... :mad:
 
I mean, you want to tell me that the other cads don't make the whims like "non manifold body"...that is, they can perform what we can't do because of this mistake or then on those operations they plan on them too? :eek:
I'm going to go to solid works tomorrow... :mad:
If you followed some past discussion of if, of this problem if it is spoken, I myself did the example that if I unload the step of a commercial bearing when the amount in itself always creates an asm with all the spheres and not a single solid body, as if I force to create a single solid it gives me non manifold error because the software does not manage the tangent bodies. to my assistance I had already presented the problem several times, but so far I have not had exhaustive answers about it.
 
You can see that discussion I was lost and using search I can't find it. Do you have a link? I'd like to read it! But do you think they'll ever help us with this or is it a structural problem of the program?
 
You can see that discussion I was lost and using search I can't find it. Do you have a link? I'd like to read it! But do you think they'll ever help us with this or is it a structural problem of the program?
for the link I must look at it too because the search function does not find me.
I strongly hope that they put their hands on us and as soon as possible because it is a crazy boiata, as the other cads using the same parasolid engine this problem solved it years ago!!!
 
I mean, you want to tell me that the other cads don't make the whims like "non manifold body"...that is, they can perform what we can't do because of this mistake or then on those operations they plan on them too? :eek:
I'm going to go to solid works tomorrow... :mad:
Good question! is it a problem of the parasolid engine or is it a deliberate choice like that of not being able to "command" the 3d model from the table?
 
the body not manifold is a problem, that not to manage the 3d models from the draft from what turns out to me is a choice of siemens, both for if and for nx
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top