dacampo
Guest
small survey:
how are you put with the delivery of st3 by your suppliers?
I'm still in another sea. .
how are you put with the delivery of st3 by your suppliers?
I'm still in another sea. .
accc, you could know cabbage....ccsteam for veneto should deliver within half month as they communicated me Friday during the presentation of st3 for customers
Hi... you could have known each other. I and my former colleague tried to formulate a couple of questions but we were looked at and almost lightninged instantly, which upset me a lot since the presentation was for customers but orchestrated it ad hoc to present a perfect product.accc, you could know cabbage....
If I thought about it first I would ask here in the forum who was present Friday.. .
cmq personal opinion st3 does not seem bad
I wanted to be as dear as to all the other presentations and ask him if there is still the error "body type non manifold" and remind him that all the other cads have solved it since 2004, but this time I held back.
strange thing they did not mention (or at least I did not hear it) that now pars can be indistinctly part or sheet, mah....
Poor thing, do you want to get him to work even when he's on his facebook? :biggrin:I will try the last way, being that on facebook I have as friendship that of dan staples to send him a direct mail from it and see if by chance he will read it and take it into consideration without being filtered by retailers/assistance etc.
Hi.
I also asked a simple question (if the links between the parts on the assembly are "bidirectional") and, come on, they did not fucilate me, he he he.Hi... you could have known each other. I and my former colleague tried to formulate a couple of questions but we were looked at and almost lightninged instantly, which upset me a lot since the presentation was for customers but orchestrated it ad hoc to present a perfect product.
By the way, I thought they were making a presentation by disconnecting from what the videos have been on youtube for 3 months. the modeling of the tank of the grass was the same seen last to padova for the presentation of the st2.
This week I did "forced wounds" (house 1 week in disease) but I hope the st3 arrived or arrives shortly to install it and test it properly. However, I have no great hope of significant improvements and resolution of such problems.
I will try the last way, being that on facebook I have as friendship that of dan staples to send him a direct mail from it and see if by chance he will read it and take it into consideration without being filtered by retailers/assistance etc.
Hi.
I think, even if in this case, good faith is evident.If you need a copy of the st3, I can pass it through my client who needs thiene.
Let me know.
I think not! the license is on the use of the sw, not on the possession of the installation DVD.I think, even if in this case, good faith is evident.
Bye.
Actually, I don't think it's allowed. Clearly it's just a formal question, but it seems to me that one can copy installation cds/dvds only for backup purposes, not to give them to third parties. Moreover if companies put triple passwords on their ftp sites not to download installers if not to authorized users, a reason will be there.I think not! the license is on the use of the sw, not on the possession of the installation DVD.
With the installer, you just don't do anything.
There is no illegal file, no reference or instigation to pirates or other.
You need to download your license from the zimenz website to get it out.
greetings
silvio
sin, I had to be there but I couldn't comeaccc, you could know cabbage....
If I thought about it first I would ask here in the forum who was present Friday.. .
even in st2 if parts from synchronous part, and turn into sheet the file remains a .parstrange thing they did not mention (or at least I did not hear it) that now pars can be indistinctly part or sheet, mah....
go quietly for st3 I can also in the morning download it from the zimens license included since I am in maintenance, but for the moment I do not feel the need, I look like I get from the dealer and then anyway since I collaborate externally with an ing. As long as he doesn't pass to st3 I can't play as I want.I also asked a simple question (if the links between the parts on the assembly are "bidirectional") and, come on, they did not fucilate me, he he he.
Look, I'm tired of being swamped when I just don't want to get caught up in my head (as they did. . )
to the other presentations I have always shredded the marones, this time I have desisted, also because they have passed me a good customer (I know, I am a sold:tongue
If you need a copy of the st3, I can pass it through my client who needs thiene.
Let me know.
greetings
silvio
I mean, you want to tell me that the other cads don't make the whims like "non manifold body"...that is, they can perform what we can't do because of this mistake or then on those operations they plan on them too?accc, you could know cabbage....
If I thought about it first I would ask here in the forum who was present Friday.. .
cmq personal opinion st3 does not seem bad
I wanted to be as dear as to all the other presentations and ask him if there is still the error "body type non manifold" and remind him that all the other cads have solved it since 2004, but this time I held back.
strange thing they did not mention (or at least I did not hear it) that now pars can be indistinctly part or sheet, mah....
If you followed some past discussion of if, of this problem if it is spoken, I myself did the example that if I unload the step of a commercial bearing when the amount in itself always creates an asm with all the spheres and not a single solid body, as if I force to create a single solid it gives me non manifold error because the software does not manage the tangent bodies. to my assistance I had already presented the problem several times, but so far I have not had exhaustive answers about it.I mean, you want to tell me that the other cads don't make the whims like "non manifold body"...that is, they can perform what we can't do because of this mistake or then on those operations they plan on them too?
I'm going to go to solid works tomorrow...![]()
for the link I must look at it too because the search function does not find me.You can see that discussion I was lost and using search I can't find it. Do you have a link? I'd like to read it! But do you think they'll ever help us with this or is it a structural problem of the program?
Good question! is it a problem of the parasolid engine or is it a deliberate choice like that of not being able to "command" the 3d model from the table?I mean, you want to tell me that the other cads don't make the whims like "non manifold body"...that is, they can perform what we can't do because of this mistake or then on those operations they plan on them too?
I'm going to go to solid works tomorrow...![]()