• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

do you know cadmatic?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MarcoBi
  • Start date Start date
MarcoBi said:
Number1,
protrei answer you that the fact that naviswork and smartplant review do not read a cadmatic file, does not place in them favor.
but I prefer not to argue.

Bye.
Click to expand...
Sorry....:frown: I didn't mean to offend you, and no less to argue, but I remain of my idea.

also because the final customer in 90 % of the cases (to me it happened so) has, and therefore wants, the file of naviswork.

since his technicians already know how to use it

As a result, it is, in my opinion, cadmatic that must be adjusted, not on the contrary.
If the autodesk decides to listen to you, I'm happy for you.

Hi.
 
numero1 said:
I quote everything except that point 4 and last point, the program if set well must be able to make the isometric as you want, and also ..... if not what sw is??? :smile:

Obviously it must be the administrator to do this, even I model only, or better I modeled with that sw now I passed to other lids.

Hi.
Click to expand...
In fact, large companies that have chosen pds or pdms as sw, spend time and resources to customize their environment satisfactorily.
Unfortunately working on a contract presupposes in the majority of cases of having to "return" customization to satisfy the needs of the customer.
isogen produces isometrics considered the world's "std" from the point of view of graphics and content. what you do with isogen can also get with cadmatic but, of course, everything must be "set" correctly.
gigo= garbage in, garbage out.:biggrin:

Bye.
 
telecad said:
good day nuero1,
Yes, sorry I read but I think I had a lapsus towards the end of the text...:confused:
a question: in what sense you have, however, in my opinion, taken the right path?
Hello and thank you
Click to expand...
you write that the company where you work has recently purchased cadmatic, good.

This is the right way if you want to work in a certain way and at a certain level.

a parametric cad for plants, whether pds, pdms, cadmatic or whatever........ That's the way, don't give up even if you may have big bucks in the start-up.

Hi.
 
numero1 said:
Sorry....:frown: I didn't mean to offend you, and no less to argue, but I remain of my idea.

also because the final customer in 90 % of the cases (to me it happened so) has, and therefore wants, the file of naviswork.

since his technicians already know how to use it

As a result, it is, in my opinion, cadmatic that must be adjusted, not on the contrary.
If the autodesk decides to listen to you, I'm happy for you.

Hi.
Click to expand...
No problem.
It is clear that it seems a cadmatic limit but in reality it is the others who generally limit the use of their own programs. .
personally use, depending on the needs and needs of the customer, navis, smartplant and eborowser.

I'm looking for a roamer that makes coffee... but in vain:
 
MarcoBi said:
In fact, large companies that have chosen pds or pdms as sw, spend time and resources to customize their environment satisfactorily.
Unfortunately working on a contract presupposes in the majority of cases of having to "return" customization to satisfy the needs of the customer.
isogen produces isometrics considered the world's "std" from the point of view of graphics and content. what you do with isogen can also get with cadmatic but, of course, everything must be "set" correctly.
gigo= garbage in, garbage out.:biggrin:

Bye.
Click to expand...
exactly, this is the thing that I reprimand to isogen is too sluggish.

cadmatic is better? isogen aside.

I don't know I don't use it, if one day it will happen I will post my direct experience.

Hi.
 
Bye to all,
I am not a designer but a programmer I am trying to understand the main features made available by ebrowser and then possibly integrate it into an application.

So I wanted to know if any of you already had a way to handle the bees of ebrowser or if for example there are missing commands that would be nice to have... personally the selection with the right button and the "nothing" with the left key I find it a very uncomfortable and "alternative" operation


thanks from now on,
Jack
 
Hey, jackomino,
I'm not sure I understand your question.
Can you clarify?
the functionalities of the licensed ebowser are besides roamer, query template attributes, measurement, search by tag or attribute, mark-up and review management (a sort of revision recording during the models review, with the possibility to send by email the notification that is then received by the ebrowser of the other person), custom query and views and more.

I am not a programmer but if you need more info...

Say hi.
 
hello and first of all thanks for the attention. . .

ok for the features you indicated me, but what I wanted to know was how to fly them via c# or visualbasic.net.

in the help provided with ebrowser there is a minimum example, but it is very little compared to what you could and would like to do..., the problem is that calls to functions (bees) that I can call from code should be made in a precise sequence to have the desired effects... and I wanted to know if there was someone who had already done qcsa waiting for cadmatic answers.

For example, in the face of a spool list I could show which are already made and make the others semi-transparent...

I hope I have clarified a little more and I gladly accept advice, suggestions and criticism... we would miss
available, jack
 
telecad said:
Good morning,

Is there someone who knows or who would know how to address me to Italian companies that deal with conversion projects and/or who sell interfaces for the interoperability between pds, pdm, cadmatic, autoplant cadwork, autopipe and others? Thank you.

like these:
http://www.sstusa.com/data-translators.php
http://www.infoplantindia.com/sw_res.htm
Click to expand...
telecad, the computer line of pleasure has a product that does exactly what you ask, although I don't think supports autopipe however the product is called elena http://www.cla-it.com/elenadetails-platform.html You see the supported cads, too, I know they were doing more.

Hi.
 
good day ootb and jackomino

thanks for the answers, I contacted and I had the info. I would like to be able to compare, so if there are other minds.. .
Thank you.

Hi.
 
Good morning.

at your disposal for conversion info. . I would, of course, be a speaker! :biggrin:

just for information know that cadmatic is able to generate also pcf, so if there is a preference for isogen (honestly I don't understand why, having had experience in the past on many projects) you can decide to use this instead of pipe. for naviswork...it is the first time I happen to see that a lack of support from a viewer (naviswork in this case) turn against the modeling tool! :confused:

On the other hand, the eborowser supports both pds, pdms, and cadmatic. Will it be a case that aramco Saudis use it to navigate the pds models via the internet (connecting the same to other business solutions)? :cool:
 

Attachments

  • PDS_review.webp
    PDS_review.webp
    322.6 KB · Views: 9
Last edited:
Good evening gricozzi,
I'm looking for a data translator and I've been thinking about the famous companies I posted links to. But I would have liked to compare the American product with the Italian one. to prevent sstusa.com is the only one that provides an evaluation version working active for seven days, while the conversion companies I contacted (two ) say that they have the sw but they have to work there (actually they do it to fit however to take the customer say they have it and that they have already done it). How do we work? but if they have already sold it for a project blah blah blah, is not ready to use? if you give me the date translator of the sstusa, after having had the opportunity to try it (so you can see if the product meets the needs), just make the payment and stop. the interface is already ready to use, no one has to finish setting it. and as if I decided to buy a car on display (so ready delivery) and the dealer told me that however they still have to mount the gearbox.
regarding the eborowser, that the Arabs use it to navigate the good pds models for them, but I am not trying to navigate a pds project. It is very good to be able to work (with cadmatics) anywhere in the world, which is very important. also the freelancer who collaborates on the project takes the company notebook around and works where he likes. As far as isometrics are concerned, the matter intrigues me not little (if you do not use isogen...I would like to see the alternative)
kind gricozzi she wrote:
"if there is a preference for isogen (honestly I don't understand why, having had experiences on many projects in the past) you can decide to use this instead of pipe. "

Will you please explain? What does "...can you decide to use this instead of pipe"? i.e. that cadmatic can export isometrics using isogen or did I misunderstand? (Excuse me, I take advantage of your working position within the cadmatic to ask technical questions to the most indicated person).
Could you please post an isometric generated by cadmatic set for a past project (of course masking contractor and project data)? I am curious (and I think others of the forum ) to see an example of isometrics, to see that cadmatic generates iso equal to competition. Thank you.
Good evening,
Telecad
 
kind sig gricozzi,
I'm sorry, I'd like to make a little clarification on something that I missed.
" for naviswork...it's the first time I see that a lack of support from a viewer (naviswork in this case) turns against the modeling tool!*"
we both know that it is not so, because the autodesk cannot wake up in the morning and decide which file types can open without permission from the softwarehouse.
therefore since cadmatic has its ebrowser it is easy to assume that there have been no agreements in this sense.
greetings
 
Good morning.

at your disposal for info about the software cla, also I as the friend gricozzi premetto who are one of the responsible cla and therefore not within the technical/comparative merit among the various software.

telecad, if you had contacted our company to have information you would have spoken to me, sincerely I do not remember in the short term a conversation about this subject, however when you want I am at your disposal.

greetings
 
Good morning

kind gtagliaretti thank you for the info, in case you want more delucidations on the software of cla I will definitely contact you.
greetings
 
telecad said:
Good morning

kind gtagliaretti thank you for the info, in case you want more delucidations on the software of cla I will definitely contact you.
greetings
Click to expand...
Telecad,

I have been able to carefully read the discussion and I care to make an important clarification, our elena software is not a converitor of "models" but a generator of specifications/catalogues for three-dimensional modelers starting from any material manager (not only our puma5), can also be used to "convert" but always we talk about specifications and catalogs and not models.

our company has always been dealing with data and not modeling 3d.

I thought it was a necessary clarification.

cordial greetings
 
Good morning, yes I knew, I had already seen the oagina in English of the sw elena on its site. to avoid misunderstandings. Thank you. greetings
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Total: 20 (members: 0, guests: 20)
Back
Top